except it's not even close to profitable now to play. you have to realize that for every round won, someone else loses... so the average is 3 wins/3 losses that's 3 slot winows of low quality, you'll be lucky to make back your cost of entry, when the same average would net you +100 ore in casual (and probably 3 rounds into the 12 bracket). It's only potentially worthwhile by the numbers if you are chasing meteorite powder, which you probably aren't unless you're an experienced player with a high set completion ratio.
Void_Singer
This is how arena usually works. The difference with other games (like Hearthstone) is that they don't have a good alternative for F2P players to gain materials. But because Gwent is more generous, it's actually more efficient to just do your daily quest & tier and avoid arena, unless you are playing for the experience/variation.
This is how arena usually works. The difference with other games (like Hearthstone) is that they don't have a good alternative for F2P players to gain materials. But because Gwent is more generous, it's actually more efficient to just do your daily quest & tier and avoid arena, unless you are playing for the experience/variation.
4RM3D;n10651191 said:
Exactly, and to top it all off looking at averages in arena is very misleading, a good player who practices arena for long enough will be much more than average and ought to end up 5+ wins constantly which should make it very simple for them to go "infinite" if they so please
I don't see why people want arena to be the only source of profit and for ladder to be just a place to attain borders and titles from now on
doesn't matter how good any one individual gets, there must always be someone that wins the match, and someone that loses it
Dominika;n10558292 said:
Arena is all about being lucky and draft more and/or better golds than your opponent.