He gets it under both conditions.Basileios said:Agreed! Btw as far as I can remember Alvin receives the medallion only when Geralt brings him to Triss... or will he get it as well when we side with Shani? ???
He gets it under both conditions.Basileios said:Agreed! Btw as far as I can remember Alvin receives the medallion only when Geralt brings him to Triss... or will he get it as well when we side with Shani? ???
When he's a kid playing "kill the elf" he tells you "I'm always the Grand Master."Drallus said:No sign whatsoever was he Jaques? I think its possible. Maybe his visions drove him mad.
I came to this thread to suggest the exact same thing! There are a lot of logical reasons for Alvin and the GM to be the same person, but the GM just doesn't look, sound, or FEEL like Alvin to me. I really can't accept Alvin as the GM, no matter how many reasons there are. But if the GM were Alvin's son (or even grandson), then it all makes sense.Taffer said:Would the storyline be consistent if Jacques / the Grand Master were actually Alvin's son?A lot of this Alvin=GM/Jacques theory operates on four items from the game:1) Many of the things you tell Alvin are repeated back to you later by Jacques de Aldersberg.2) The amulet you remove from Jacques de Aldersberg's body looks almost exactly like the one you gave to Alvin, except that it looks older and worn.3) Triss makes various comments about Alvin being able to teleport through space and possibly through time, remarking that he could be anywhere in time and space.4) If Geralt decides not to fight The King of the Wild Hunt, he tells Geralt that Geralt knew Jacques de Aldersberg by another name.If Alvin teleported back in time, he wouldn't necessarily have teleported back only 40-50 years, though that's perfectly possible too. He could have teleported back further than that, tried to "be good," as Geralt told him to be, tried to live a quiet life, settled down in Aldersberg (or wherever), and had a kid named Jacques who grew up to be the GM.Alvin would likely have been strongly influenced by the things that Geralt told him, which is evident from the way he reacts with a solemn "I'll remember that," or similar remarks. It's reasonable that he would impart these same ideas to his own children later in life. If Jacques is Alvin's son, this would explain why Jacques tells Geralt many of these things later.I think this idea is a stretch. However, it solves many of the inconsistencies related to the Alvin=GM/Jacques theory, such as appearance, accent, etc.Jacques / the GM could have obtained the amulet from his father (either if Alvin passed it down to him, or if the GM got it from his father by force at some point).The one thing that keeps sticking in my head, though, is the King of the Wild Hunt's remark that Geralt knew Jacques de Aldersberg by "a different name."If Jacques is NOT Alvin, then the only other name Geralt knew him by was "Grand Master," which is actually a title. I don't know whether that is what the King of the Wild Hunt meant by "a different name." If so, it wasn't meant to be a profound remark on his part, but merely a statement of fact. But then again, perhaps he was making a more profound remark because the "different name" was indeed Alvin. It is this problem that keeps sticking in my mind, and I sometimes wonder if there are more clues available in the original language.Ultimately, it's unclear, which is one of the reasons this was such a great game.
What does that prove?Triss calls him "Geralt" at home but "Witcher" at the Tavern.Aquaintus said:Alvin adressed Geralt by his first name. Grandmaster adressed Geralt formally as "Witcher Geralt"
yep.. that's one of the things that gives me bad vibes..MR said:When he's a kid playing "kill the elf" he tells you "I'm always the Grand Master."
MR said:MR said:Alvin adressed Geralt by his first name.
Grandmaster has Dimeretium amulet Triss gave him blocking his magic so she can't sense him.Aquaintus said:Also, if Grandmaster and Alvin are both the same person. That means they are both a 'source' and so when you place the sensors, Triss would have picked up that there are 2 sources in Vizima. She would have you investigate both if it came to that.
oh really? do you believe every rumour you hear in the streets ?Grandmaster sired Siegfried illegitimatly. Siegfried displays no source type powers.
Ever watch Star Trek?WitchHunt said:Something is still bothering me about the whole Alvin = GM thing. Ok, Grand Master is behind the whole Salamandra plot to take the secrets in order to create a new human race. (Maybe I am mistaken here?) One that will help everyone to survive the coming ice age, correct? So, the GM had to have been alive and in power at the beginning of the game? He put the whole plan together, correct? So, in the beginning of the story, Alvin is already grown up and is GM (if not, then who is behind Salamandra at the beginning?). So, where does little Alvin come from in the beginning if GM is already well into carrying out his master plan?
Check My query, exactly what I thought, this game has only one ending masked as three different ones. The ending you play is the same, no matter what.mothra said:i won't elaborate on it because there are so many other threads and the game practically RUBS IT IN YOUR FACEif you pay attention. play it again with triss and give different "life"-tips to Alvin in Ch.4 and then see what happens.......ze Grandmaster suddenly changes all his speeches, he even tells you that you are EVEN after he rescues you in the swamp (together with Shani, no matter how you chose before),making connections to Chapter1 where you and Shani kill the dogs following Alvin and the peasant woman.those are just 2 things, search the forum, you can come up with dozens more while your reasoning is just not correct.the locket given to alvin by triss has no effect as well (he no longer does magic but still teleports away, it's more an limiter than 100%shield)triss mentions the time/space jumping (maybe shani not)alvin describes how the "jumping" feels and that he's disoriented and daytime is not righti tried to teach Avlin good things as well, the perverted form of them was presented to me by the GM in the last chapter (only Alvin could have known that)of course the writers could pull a 180 at each point and come up with some:1) Alvin jumps back, meets other "gifted" guy (jaques) and gets to be HIS protege, tells him of the future2) Alvin is who-knows-where. Jaques is a product of the sorceresses, a failed experiment like Alvin, they tried to control him like now Alvin with a stupid amuletthat did not work but was of so high sentimental value to Jaques that he still wears it years after....no, A=GM, I never had ANY doubt. not even after the confusing end-sequence it was clear for me who I just killed and why.and that was the AWESOME part of the game. that what made the ending so cool.I had the GM suspected the whole last 2 chapters long but in the endfight when he just repeated what I told him in Ch4 I was certain.I waited the whole time for a dialogue option to unmask or maybe better: persuade him to stop it.
Wow you have imagination,Geralt knows he has heard those words before. And that explanation is the less logical. I suggest you read Arthur Conan Doyle.phalzyr said:@mothra As I mentioned in one of those threads all these life story things told to alvin could easily of been overheard magically by the GM and his presentation altered to coax Geralt into following his path. In game it even shows Triss looking at Geralt and cussing when she sees him about to kiss Adda. Why can't a more powerful sorcerer do the same thing? BTW, I do believe it is Alvin, but who knows but the writers. we'll find out in a sequel maybe.the biggest support for GM=Alvin is all that stuff being spit back at Geralt that he told Alvin BUT as you can see by my above that could be explained in another way, possibly even others... We won't know it until wer're told it...