Maybe Brokulaks are introduced in the sequel as well? ... though there is no hint to them? 
They've said that? When? Where?gamewidow said:Give that cdp has said the new game is set in kaedwen, i seriously doubt brokilon will feature, since that's not even close to kaedwen, it's like nearly the other side of the continenteace:
Have you forgotten how we transported from Vizima to Murky Waters? Nothing is impossible if you think about it from this angle.gamewidow said:Give that cdp has said the new game is set in kaedwen, i seriously doubt brokilon will feature, since that's not even close to kaedwen, it's like nearly the other side of the continenteace:
I think what happened is that someone noticed that the soldiers were wearing Kaedwen's symbols on their uniforms.Dezired said:They've said that? When? Where?Dezired said:Give that cdp has said the new game is set in kaedwen, i seriously doubt brokilon will feature, since that's not even close to kaedwen, it's like nearly the other side of the continenteace:
Well, that's quite possible, but if they're continuing the storyline from TW1, there could still be some fallout from the stolen witchers' secrets. The Grandmaster seemed to think that he was the main boss behind the plot to steal the secrets ... but he was also seriously crazy, so it's possible that he was being used or manipulated by someone higher up that we don't know about yet.Of course, you have access to information that most of the rest of us don't have, and I never know when you're speculating and when you're giving us a hint.Dezired said:We had mutation / alteration as principle threm in TW1. I don't think we will have it once again in the sequel. An unbiased person may think, it's all about mutation in the Witcher world ;D Judging from the title I think Geralt has to struggle with a network of intrigues, treachery and reliance. And actully he doesn't want to have any business with but gets involved.
You mean to say that Blue ain't even close to Red?PetraSilie said:Don't overvalue me... and all moderators. In cases like that CDPR harbor all secrets and reveal relevant info only to closed staff workers![]()
I got 'yaPetraSilie said:I can't give you furter info on that. Just... there are Kikimore workers and warriors... and of course the queen (resp.King) :wave:
Not for a single player game. I once ran a guild in World of Warcraft where my highest level member used a powerleveling/gold buying service.The player had to have the best equipment, reach the level the fastest, ect. It would have seem harmless. He had his account taken over by the "spammer", his stuff stolen, and characters deleted. Last I heard from him (before we moved to another MMORPG), he had to jump through hoops to get his stuff/character back. Also, it is highly likely that these sites have keyloggers in them.Dezired said:Fascinating. I've NEVER understood the purpose of these spammers, though. Who would seriously want to hand over their character to a powerleveler who uses spammers/spambots? Not me. Do they even get ANYONE using this method?
Adda's hair is red because in the english translation of the short story "The Witcher" her hair is described as "flaxen red", not white like in the original polish version. Also in the english translation she is never described as being mentally retarded. She is simply described as "somewhat dull-witted". My sources are the short story "The Witcher", which shipped with the UK and US version of the computer game and the U.S translation of the book "The Last Wish".LithMaethor said:how did Adda ended up with red hair and not a retard (as she is in the books)
Mwahahahaha... Dissection time... :evil:saadishsnake said:So I've read about 20 pages worth of posts in this topic and it seems that Alvin being the Grandmaster is the dominant hypothesis. I do agree with that to an extent, but now I'm having my doubts:
- Some children are born blonde and become brunette as age advances (myself included).saadishsnake said:- First of all Alvin has blonde hair and Jacques has brown hair -- maybe Alvin dyed his hair, but this definitely sticks out like a sore thumb.
If he did, there'd be no climax for Geralt agreeing. Once the agreement was done and he revealed it thereafter, the revelation would be unstoppable and Geralt would not turn no more. Such are the powers of pursuasion.saadishsnake said:- Jacques never mentions himself to be Alvin at the end of the game. If he wanted Geralt to join him, this could've been the turning point. Geralt would have a tougher time killing someone he last saw as a child.
Salamandra was a tool and no more. Like Radovid sought to use them, he would not have been aware of all their actions. Do you know everything your computer downloads while on the net? Not really as you get virus, ads and whatnot. Same with Salamandra, a tool, fully-automated and independent.saadishsnake said:- Then there's how the Grandmaster basically hired the Salamandra to do all those things in the game, including kidnap Alvin. So the GM hires a group to kidnap his younger self so he can be the future ruler of the world? Thinking about it can even make Einstein's head explode.
Ok, this can be con-densely dissected ]:->... Agreed, trickery is the game is it not? But, the amulet "looked" the same (which confirms its originality and being one and the same), but "older" which makes me believe that it takes more than a single life-time to wear-out a magical item such as the amulet (ergo: the GM was repeating distorted sayings of Geralt because they changed over time while they were passed down through the generations. See what I'm getting at?saadishsnake said:- It would be too convenient for Alvin to be the GM, and I think The Witcher team is smarter than this. Alvin being the evil Grandmaster is something you'd see in simpler RPGs. I think they're basically leaving all those "clues" out there to trick us, and obviously as a setup for the sequel.- I doubt that only one of those Dimetherium Amulets exist in the entire world, and Triss is the only person had one (before she gave it to Alvin). The amulet was made for sources, both Alvin and the GM are sources so they would both have those amulets. I'm sure other sources in the world have them as well.- The GM basically repeating to Geralt what Geralt said to Alvin doesn't mean anything. Triss is able to magically spy on Geralt, and I'm sure other magic users are as well. Why can't the powerful Grandmaster have that same ability?
Exactly, which means with his powers being out of control at the young age, lets just say the more he was frightened, the further back he traveled. Assuming that be the case, the story is not as simple as you thought...saadishsnake said:- Alvin can travel anywhere through time. If Alvin is the GM he can travel to see the future and see that Geralt kills him. Well, why doesn't he travel back into the past and kill Geralt immediately? Why waste time letting him live if you know he's going to stop your plans.
According to your presumptions, you may be on the path, but my alternate and contradictory assumptions state otherwise. I shall darken you clear thesis right into the grey areas once again. The link between Alvin and the GM is undeniable, but not accurately full-proof as I've shown. Oh, and paradoxal laws state that no loop may be formed, so GM's actions and Alvin's action will not intersect, maybe just intertwine if possible. I think I've pointed out some stuff for you to consider so far...saadishsnake said:My hypothesis is that Alvin and the Grandmaster are linked, but they are not the same person. Alvin is obviously a powerful source and the Grandmaster probably "feels" his presence or something so he hires Salamandra to hunt him down. With two sources fighting together they're unstoppable. When Alvin is possessed with those visions, maybe it's the Grandmaster manipulating him? Isn't there also a point in the game where the Grandmaster indicates Triss was working for him -- I believe in Act 5 when you first enter the swamp. He describes a spy that sounds a lot like Triss. He could've gave Triss that amulet to give to Geralt to give to Alvin. Maybe that amulet actually helped the Grandmaster have some control over Alvin?
OH BOY, Do NOT even get me started on this one..... :wall:Hopefully I've opened your eyes to other possibilities that'll persuade you to think not of how relations relate, but of how they cannot relate.saadishsnake said:Now, as for that assassin...
1) The hair changing. Even though it happens in real life to some people, making it occur in a video game is completely pointless. The GrandMaster could've had a shaved head instead of brown hair if they wanted to make the link b/w Alvin and the GM subtle. So in The Witcher 2 they're going to say, "Oh, btw, the Grandmaster that you killed was Alvin, his hair turned brown as he got older."2) Is there even an option to agree with the GM -- I didn't see any in playthrough. Maybe if there was one you'd have a point here.3) I really don't see why Azar Javed and The Professor would kidnap a source without the permission of the Grandmaster. They wouldn't know how to effectively use a source like a GM would. 4) Once again, who knows how many of those amulets exist5) I'm not saying the story is simple. If it was we wouldn't have this discussion. 6) I'm 60% sure that the GM is Alvin and 40% that it isn't.I think the best56236 said:Mwahahahaha... Dissection time... :evil:56236 said:So I've read about 20 pages worth of posts in this topic and it seems that Alvin being the Grandmaster is the dominant hypothesis. I do agree with that to an extent, but now I'm having my doubts:- Some children are born blonde and become brunette as age advances (myself included).56236 said:- First of all Alvin has blonde hair and Jacques has brown hair -- maybe Alvin dyed his hair, but this definitely sticks out like a sore thumb.If he did, there'd be no climax for Geralt agreeing. Once the agreement was done and he revealed it thereafter, the revelation would be unstoppable and Geralt would not turn no more. Such are the powers of pursuasion.56236 said:- Jacques never mentions himself to be Alvin at the end of the game. If he wanted Geralt to join him, this could've been the turning point. Geralt would have a tougher time killing someone he last saw as a child.Salamandra was a tool and no more. Like Radovid sought to use them, he would not have been aware of all their actions. Do you know everything your computer downloads while on the net? Not really as you get virus, ads and whatnot. Same with Salamandra, a tool, fully-automated and independent.56236 said:- Then there's how the Grandmaster basically hired the Salamandra to do all those things in the game, including kidnap Alvin. So the GM hires a group to kidnap his younger self so he can be the future ruler of the world? Thinking about it can even make Einstein's head explode.Ok, this can be con-densely dissected ]:->... Agreed, trickery is the game is it not? But, the amulet "looked" the same (which confirms its originality and being one and the same), but "older" which makes me believe that it takes more than a single life-time to wear-out a magical item such as the amulet (ergo: the GM was repeating distorted sayings of Geralt because they changed over time while they were passed down through the generations. See what I'm getting at?56236 said:- It would be too convenient for Alvin to be the GM, and I think The Witcher team is smarter than this. Alvin being the evil Grandmaster is something you'd see in simpler RPGs. I think they're basically leaving all those "clues" out there to trick us, and obviously as a setup for the sequel.- I doubt that only one of those Dimetherium Amulets exist in the entire world, and Triss is the only person had one (before she gave it to Alvin). The amulet was made for sources, both Alvin and the GM are sources so they would both have those amulets. I'm sure other sources in the world have them as well.- The GM basically repeating to Geralt what Geralt said to Alvin doesn't mean anything. Triss is able to magically spy on Geralt, and I'm sure other magic users are as well. Why can't the powerful Grandmaster have that same ability?Exactly, which means with his powers being out of control at the young age, lets just say the more he was frightened, the further back he traveled. Assuming that be the case, the story is not as simple as you thought...56236 said:- Alvin can travel anywhere through time. If Alvin is the GM he can travel to see the future and see that Geralt kills him. Well, why doesn't he travel back into the past and kill Geralt immediately? Why waste time letting him live if you know he's going to stop your plans.According to your presumptions, you may be on the path, but my alternate and contradictory assumptions state otherwise. I shall darken you clear thesis right into the grey areas once again. The link between Alvin and the GM is undeniable, but not accurately full-proof as I've shown. Oh, and paradoxal laws state that no loop may be formed, so GM's actions and Alvin's action will not intersect, maybe just intertwine if possible. I think I've pointed out some stuff for you to consider so far...56236 said:My hypothesis is that Alvin and the Grandmaster are linked, but they are not the same person. Alvin is obviously a powerful source and the Grandmaster probably "feels" his presence or something so he hires Salamandra to hunt him down. With two sources fighting together they're unstoppable. When Alvin is possessed with those visions, maybe it's the Grandmaster manipulating him? Isn't there also a point in the game where the Grandmaster indicates Triss was working for him -- I believe in Act 5 when you first enter the swamp. He describes a spy that sounds a lot like Triss. He could've gave Triss that amulet to give to Geralt to give to Alvin. Maybe that amulet actually helped the Grandmaster have some control over Alvin?OH BOY, Do NOT even get me started on this one..... :wall:Hopefully I've opened your eyes to other possibilities that'll persuade you to think not of how relations relate, but of how they cannot relate.56236 said:Now, as for that assassin...eace:
It sounds like the phenomenon of blonde hair darkening with age is one that you haven't seen, so it seems weird to you. To those of us who've seen it a lot, it seems completely normal.1) The hair changing. Even though it happens in real life to some people, making it occur in a video game is completely pointless. The GrandMaster could've had a shaved head instead of brown hair if they wanted to make the link b/w Alvin and the GM subtle. So in The Witcher 2 they're going to say, "Oh, btw, the Grandmaster that you killed was Alvin, his hair turned brown as he got older."
*blink* Have you forgotten that Azar Javed is an extremely powerful mage? He's more powerful than Triss, during the Prologue. He's also very arrogant. Triss thought that she could control Alvin, so it's practically certain that Javed would think that he could control Alvin.3) I really don't see why Azar Javed and The Professor would kidnap a source without the permission of the Grandmaster. They wouldn't know how to effectively use a source like a GM would.
And that's part of the beauty of The Witcher. Things are ambiguous enough that different people can see different things in the same events. There's a very long thread about Abigail, about whether she was evil or not, and I LOVE that, that this game affects people so much that people really want to know whether they made the right decision about Abigail.5) I'm not saying the story is simple. If it was we wouldn't have this discussion.
That sounds about right to me. A lot of people act as if the fans have "proved" that Alvin is the GM, but I don't think so. I think it's a strong hypothesis but not the only possible one.6) I'm 60% sure that the GM is Alvin and 40% that it isn't.
Ah-ah, 56236!56236 said:- Some children are born blonde and become brunette as age advances (myself included).