Yup the horse is dead. Bury it, have a moment of silence to grieve for it, then move on please, both of you.Anyway, that's like beating a dead horse since I've already admitted that it's just my opinion...
Yup the horse is dead. Bury it, have a moment of silence to grieve for it, then move on please, both of you.Anyway, that's like beating a dead horse since I've already admitted that it's just my opinion...
The Time of Contempt said:Against the black sky appears a milky, quickly brightening ribbon, writhing like a serpent. The wind hits the willows once more, throwing up clouds of leaves and dry grass.
The distant lights vanish. They disappear and blur in the deluge of the million blue sparks which suddenly light up the entire swamp. The horse snorts, whinnies, and charges frantically across the causeway. Ciri struggles to remain in the saddle.
The vague, ghastly shapes of riders become visible in the ribbon sliding across the sky. As they come closer and closer, they can be seen ever more clearly. Buffalo horns and ragged crests sway on their helmets, and cadaverous masks show white beneath them. The riders sit on horses' skeletons, cloaked in ragged caparisons. A fierce gale howls among the willows, blades of lightning slash the black sky. The wind moans louder and louder. No, it's not the wind. It's ghostly singing.
The ghastly cavalcade turns and hurtles straight at her. The hooves of the spectral horses stir up the glow of the will o' the wisps suspended above the swamps. At the head of the cavalcade gallops the King of the Wild Hunt. A rusty helmet sways above his skull-like face, its gaping eye sockets burning with a livid flame. A ragged cloak flutters. A necklace, as empty as an old peapod, rattles against the rusty cuirass, a necklace which, it is said, once contained precious stones, which fell out during the frenzied chase across the heavens. And became stars...
It isn't true! It doesn't exist! It's a nightmare, a phantom, an illusion! I'm only imagining this!
The King of the Wild hunt spurs on his skeleton steed and erupts in wild, horrifying laughter.
O, Child of the Elder Blood! Your belong to us! You are ours! Join our procession, join our hunt! We will race, race unto the very end, unto eternity, unto the very end of existence! You are ours, starry-eyed daughter of chaos! Join us; learn the joy of the hunt! You are ours. You are one of us! Your place is among us!
'No!' she cries. 'Be gone! You are corpses!'
The King of the Wild Hunt laughs, the rotten teeth snapping above his rusted gorget. The skull's eye sockets glitter lividly.
Yes, we are corpses. But you are death.
Ciri clung to the horse's neck. She didn't have to urge her horse on. Sensing the pursuing apparitions behind her, the steed thundered across the causeway at a breakneck gallop.
If we bring up the lore card, then I don't see how the King of the Wild Hunt, as written by Sapkowski in that page I quoted, isn't a "cartoony super-villain" and is a "believable character spoken by a real human (read: elf) without some artificial voice alteration". Nothing about Eredin when chasing Ciri is outside the evil stereotype, and I think his voice is the least thing that's being "artificially" (or, well, magically) alterated. They're specters riding on skeletal horses during the night, sending the girl's horse into a frenzy of fear, singing to her about joining the dark side with them through rotten teeth with burning skull eye sockets, and laughing maniacally. Let's be honest here.The new voice is downright terrible. Period. It's the voice of a cartoony super-villain altered by a computer instead of a voice of a real, believable character spoken by a real human being without some artifiical voice alteration.
This is downright disrespectful with a Holier-Than-Thou attitude in taste. I don't know about the Reds reading too many "superhero comics", but if anything, going by the description of the Wild Hunt in The Time of Contempt, CDPR toned down the cartoonish aspect of the Red horsemen.And yes, the Wild Hunt design is plain bad, I fully agree. It's like wasting the whole potential of these guys as serious counter-parts from the very start and putting them into a cheap, generic power fantasy with power armor, super bad ass voices and appearances. Why creating real, breathing, lifelike characters with actual motivations and believable actions if you could just create cartoon characters instead? I guess people at CDPR have read way too many superhero comics. The Witcher games remind me more and more like a fantasy superhero story coming directly from a power fantasy comic book...poor Sapkowski. No wonder he doesn't like the games and what CDPR did with his narrative...
What was the point of Eredin's skull-face with burning eye-sockets? What was the point of spectral horses? What was the point of any of their pyrotechnics when chasing Ciri?Agreed..Design of Dearg Ruadhri is dissapointing from the start. What is the point of metalic voice and some "sauronish", Aen Elle equivalent of power armor? To make them more badass? To shock people who haven't read the books?
For f..ks sake, they have a time travel ability, they are skillful swordsmen and probably mages...If that is not enough "badassery" I don't know what it is...
Well, how do we know they are the same guy? for all we know we are hearing three different riders?I don't know if this is thread worthy, but I really want to know other people's opinion on the change in Eredin's voice. As you may or may not have noticed, his voice sounds quite different in the latest trailer compared to VGX and SoD. It already sounded different in SoD, but that wasn't a drastic change and it still sounded good imo. This time however I feel like they've really made it worse. In the VGX trailer it had a certain cold metallic feel to it, which sounded pretty unique and badass. In SoD it still retained some of that, but it just sounded clearer, so it was easier to hear what he said. Now it just sounds like a way too low generic evil demonic voice to me. Do you agree with this, or do you like the change they made in his voice? Which one is your favorite?
VGX:
SoD:
Elder Blood:
A lot of people think it's Lena, including me. Yenn sounds like her but I doubt it is actually Lena because it would have been a big deal and they would have announced it, like with Charles Dance.did i read somewhere else that Lena Headey is the voice of Yennifer? has that been confirmed?
No. The difference is that the typical evil stereotype character does evil "for the sake of evil". But in Sapkowski's books - as you mentioned yourself - we actually know a lot more about the Red Riders than their appearance in the Witcher world. We know who they truly are and we also know quite a bit what they actually think.Like it or not, even in Sapkowski's books they appear - at least this once, but I'm sure that even more if I could be bothered to check - as your "generic evil guys". And there's nothing wrong with that, if it's well executed.
Yes. I suppose that's possible. It's just that in the VGX and Elder Blood trailer they show Eredin. In SoD they show the mage, so it's possible it's his voice in SoD, but I still think it's Eredin speaking in VGX and Elder Blood.Well, how do we know they are the same guy? for all we know we are hearing three different riders?
especially for the guy on the sword of destiny, ive always had an inkling that it was a magical elf who had the power of foresight like Avallach not Eredin
But that's not exactly a "no" to what I wrote. What I wrote is that in the particular instance I copied from the book, they manifest themselves in a way that makes them appear like the generic evil guys. I didn't say that in their essence they're the stereotypical evil. I said that they, at least once, looked that way. It was their entrance.No. The difference is that the typical evil stereotype character does evil "for the sake of evil". But in Sapkowski's books - as you mentioned yourself - we actually know a lot more about the Red Riders than their appearance in the Witcher world. We know who they truly are and we also know quite a bit what they actually think.
I agree Scholdarr, but I think that this means you should also be a bit careful. It works both ways. Do we know that this scene really captures their appearance instead of prying on a person's imagination? No, we don't know. Do we know that they pry on a person's imagination? No, we don't know. In such a case one interpretation is as good as the other. Actually, I would say that the burden of persuasion\proof is on the person claiming that what's really happening is very different from what's being described, and that burden hasn't been lifted yet.And about the specific scene of the book you've quoted: you should always think about different meta-levels in literature and different ways of interpretation of a specific scene. How do we know that this scene really captures the "real" appearance of the Wild Hunt? How much is just the imagination and fear of Ciri? How much does she mix up reality with the legends and myths she heard about the hunt? We always have to be carefully about perspective and circumstances when reading literature. Is it the perspective of the outside observer (and therefore possibly the author himself) or is it more the perspective of one of his characters and therefore just a manifestation how they see their outer world?
I agree.Well, in the end it's also quite possible that the Aen Elle magically altered their appearance for their riders to induce as much fear as possible on the battlefield or to create a certain sense of authority. They could perhaps also change their voice for that very reason. If that's the case I really, really hope that we also see the people "behind the mask" and the Wild Hunt won't stay in their (super villain) roles the whole time. I really hope that we also see the "real" Eredin in the game, showing his real face and speaking with his real, "normal" , not bad-ass super-deep voice. That way the difference between playing the role on the battlefield or while being on the ride with the Hunt and being just their real self in more quiet and private scenes would be much more powerful and it would also give the Hunt so much more depth. We already know that Avallac'h showed himself in the Witcher world as his real self before in the books, speaking to Geralt about the future and the prophecy for example. So I hope CDPR gives the Aen Elle enough space and opportunity to develop more depth that goes much beyond their obvious appearance as Wild Hunt. In the end, the most "powerful" and impressive villains are those who we can sympathize or feel with, at least in parts. We don't have to agree with their actions but at least we should be able to understand their basic motives and what actual thinking patterns led to their actions. Being able to look behind the public mask of villains and proving that there are still "normal" people and not mindless evil monsters is a sign of good writing and storytelling imo. So if the voice of Eredin and the appearance of the Hunt stays in the game like they are presented in the trailers (and they will do so) I hope for an extreme change of appearance and voice at some point in the game. Maybe even a second voice actor for the "real" Eredin without magical alerations or wearing a mask would be cool IMHO. That way they'd also respect the literary basis.![]()
he said me that i "was probably lying i have a r9 270x" that "is below the minimum specs for AC unity and that's why it works bad" and my opinion on ac4 being and looking better "is wrong , no question".As long as there's at least two interpretations that are reasonable (and I think I showed that there's reason to accept both sides) such authoritative comments that completely dismiss one design decision in favor of a more "realistic and less cartoony one" virtually say - your interpretation is pathetic, mine is correct. I don't want people to walk on eggshells when voicing their opinions, but being direct doesn't mean dissing on everyone else by essentially calling things uninspired, laughable, etc.
I agree with you...They look 'badass' and generic in the book also...But this is different type of badassery-they are spectral riders, corpses on horse skeletons with rusty helmets and ragged cloaks..The vague, ghastly shapes of riders become visible in the ribbon sliding across the sky. As they come closer and closer, they can be seen ever more clearly. Buffalo horns and ragged crests sway on their helmets, and cadaverous masks show white beneath them. The riders sit on horses' skeletons, cloaked in ragged caparisons. A fierce gale howls among the willows, blades of lightning slash the black sky. The wind moans louder and louder. No, it's not the wind. It's ghostly singing.
The ghastly cavalcade turns and hurtles straight at her. The hooves of the spectral horses stir up the glow of the will o' the wisps suspended above the swamps. At the head of the cavalcade gallops the King of the Wild Hunt. A rusty helmet sways above his skull-like face, its gaping eye sockets burning with a livid flame. A ragged cloak flutters. A necklace, as empty as an old peapod, rattles against the rusty cuirass, a necklace which, it is said, once contained precious stones, which fell out during the frenzied chase across the heavens. And became stars...
Doesnt seem any different to me. It says eredin has a helmet, cuirass, cloak, skull face, and hes riding a skeletal horse. The in game version pretty much checks all those boxes, it even looks rusty and worn. Only thing missing are the flaming eye holes.@eliharel
I agree with you...They look 'badass' and generic in the book also...But this is different type of badassery-they are spectral riders, corpses on horse skeletons with rusty helmets and ragged cloaks..
What we've seen in trailers so far is completely different...
And I just dislike the design...Power armors, metalic voices are not necessary...maybe I am getting old but that is not intimidating or shocking or badass-just ridiculous...
Eredin's first version had a tower on top of his helm, ffs![]()
![]()
Like most of us, just some who know (sic) Sapkowski hate games plot and have deep sorrow about how bad developed characters made of his creations are totally against their depiction so far.The Wild Hunt's look is badass and stick to the world described on books in my opinion.
Would you like to identify the source of that statement? Because it doesn't bear any resemblance to any quote from Sapkowski that has previously been discussed here.Like most of us, just some who know (sic) Sapkowski hate games plot and have deep sorrow about how bad developed characters made of his creations are totally against their depiction so far.
Sapkowski do not know anything about the plot of games or its narrative, ar least it's what he said last time i did read him talking about the games ( http://www.eurogamer.net/articles/2012-11-06-ever-wondered-what-the-author-of-the-witcher-books-thinks-about-the-games ), would love to know your sources for what you said.