since patch 1.4 you can press CTRL while passing over the loot and you Auto-Loot or do you mean something else?mellojoe said:
Run REGISTER.EXE on your computer and follow the instruction...Brighteyes said:
If you'll have any probs, take a look here (at the first post) http://www.thewitcher.com/forum/index.php?topic=2585.0http://www.thewitcher.com/registration/en/www/support.htmlBrighteyes said:
Please, please, please for the love of God DO NOT add multiplayer to this game.
why not have kalkstein find a cure for geralt to start a family and train them to become witchers as well to fullfill there prophicies
A interesting point you bring here Well this is just my idea why not First off you mite have a bunch of not veary happy TW Fans not just form the game but form the books too because Witcher are not born but made after years of training and not many of them live.I don't know if you ever read any of the books I have only read The last Wish myself And from what gather from those Stories Geralt is meant to walk alone and be a outsider And a lot of ppl can identify with that.That just my 2centsdrizzit483 said:
they're already out: http://www.thewitcher.com/forum/index.php?topic=13855.msg462294#msg462294( for the Enhanced Edition patch users or Enhanced Edition DVD owners )Hamenaglar said:
-Do not add multiplayer (its degrade the history)-Make the skills,equipment and abilities more important (a little bit like Diablo)-Make the combat controls more important (to make several combos or so)-Expands the story to other countries (at less,to have 4 or 5 capital cities...maybe less bigger but different)And in story,maybe searching Ciri for all the world,or maybe a piece of history before met Ciri (witcher job,searching to survive and to find Jen...going to Tanned and so)
More free movement within an area, but keep the area system as it's a great tool to show a dynamic world in which things change. By keeping the areas, it can be shown how your actions influence the world around you. For example, imagine you have to help a camp of loggers against some generic forest monsters (just for the sake of the argument). If you succeed and return to the area during later parts of the game, maybe the clearing should be much bigger, a cabin could have been built, a garden planted. Conversely, if you fail the effects could be some unmarked graves and fresh trees growing amidst the stumps of the old ones, with the logger gone.It's technically a lot simpler to use that system, and it's a lot more bug proof. Games like Gothic 3 tried the completely free system and failed miserably (not even mentioning the pressure such a system puts on your processing power).That being said, I would like to actually see those changes. I liked "The Witcher"'s linear approach, but it would be nice if you could actually re-visit some of the places you've already been to during the game, and see what your actions caused.As for the expansion/sequel, I'd prefer playing as Geralt. You needn't even develop many new abilities for him as there are esay work-arounds for that: like letting the player move him through the prologue at whose end Geralt is almost mortally wounded and needs to relearn much of what he's known before. Yes, it's basically the same as with the original game, but seriously, can we make Geralt more powerful without breaking the setting?There's also no need to expand the game to several countries. "The Witcher" took place in Vizima's direct vicinity. It'd be good to use the city again (especially with the reconstruction that'd be going on) and simply expand a little bit deeper into the vicinity. There ought to be enough small towns and villages nearby.And finally, I'd like to have an editor more accessible for general modding. D'jinni is a nice piece of work, but it's also one of the reasons why "The Witcher" never will be as popular as the TES or NWN series: namely the fact that you cannot use preset tilesets (of which "The Witcher" would have plenty) to create your own areas and the stories surrounding them. You are basically limited to placing quests in the areas the game already provides.That's why there are literally thousands of mods for NWN or TES - and something like a dozen "The Witcher" (yes, I'm exagerating, I know). It was easy to mod with NWN's editor, even if your native language is not English. I'd like something comparable for "The Witcher", because the universe and the game both are superb. But like many others, I'm only a modder - not a modeller. CD Project really missed a chance here for long-term consumer binding. I hope they'll not make that mistake again, because this game really deserves its place in the sun.
I would like to see an online witcher's world RPG. You could create your own witcher and develope him/her. You start out as a normal person with all the weaknesses and hardships. You work up enough orins to gain a spot in a witcher school. As a young witcher going through the trials. You must work up your Exp. to pass levels of transformations. The higher your level, the more requests you'll have for your services for major quests. You can take on any job from the bulletin boards. You can team up with other witchers and share Exp. or go it alone and keep all the Exp. You can buy and sell items and equipment. I think you should be able to have a horse to carry more items and travel greater distances throughout the realm. You should be able to outfit the horse with such things as a trunk for increased capacity. Armor for battle on your stead. Your witcher should be able to learn magic when you've trained him/her in the ways of the art. Depending on what part of the world your in. The monsters, animals, items, magic, armor,and languages will be different. I think Learning languages would add to the depth of the gaming experience. The quests you partake in will alter your character's stance with the community around you (the town or kingdom). You can have a good reputation and receive request for service from peaceful kingdoms. You can have a bad reputation and receive requests for you service from War Lords. No matter what sort of witcher you are, one fact remains, yor a witcher. The witcher's code prohibits fighting with other witchers.Aside from add-ons. Online gaming would be the next logical step for this game.Perhaps even a movie.. As far as add-ons goes... How about the search for Alvin. I'm sure that'll take the witcher to some far out places.
Do you know the Witcher: Versus browser game? here is the forum and here the recent new plans. There is one point about MMO, Versus likely becomes a MMO. Though I guess it would be slightly different than your ideas. If (!) Versus becomes a MMO I doubt, the PC game becomes a MMO too.But that's my personal opinion and interpretation
So thanx first for the witcher, great solo game.First NO MMO or multiplayer game, will totaly degrade the experience. This game is better to play solo.Maybe adding a extention for what happend when u save the princess, or to live the battle of Brena when the character, was kill in the past.
The ability to play on after the end of the current game, and visit old places. WIth new quests opened up - monsters to be slain to protect the populace. Bounties to be won. Women to be seduced. Maybe even new areas.
maybe a extension to be able to play on even when you finish all the quests and the main quest and maybe some random quests appearing every 3 days? id like to be able to play my game from the finish and continue for as long as i like to play that way i can enjoy my game play for an unlimited amount of time, i am kind of new here so ill say this i finished the game in 3 days and i would like to extent the game play to be unlimited amount of playing time without only being able to play until i finish the fight with the salamander and the grand master, anyone agree that the game play should be extended to be unlimited hours of play?