LOL. I hate people saying that!!! They don't want to even look at the gameplay when the graphics are not as good at oblivionKonrado said:I'm playing. I'm not going to give you that omg i love the game, but IMO it is a solid RPG and it's a lot of fun to do those combo moves. The game has sam small graphic issue, same as all other games. One time weapon was in the same place as arm (look silly) and once in a while Geralt makes a moon walk. But the combat is solid and i had no problems so far. To sum up, if you're not one of those "Oblivion had better graphics" guys then you should buy TW and see it. It is worth the money![]()
Yup, devs are reading thisMichal Brat said:If there is any developer reading this - there is a bug in the game. if the game autosaves and youhave not enough free disc space, you are no longer able to move the main character.
It's not only marketing, the game actually can take even longer. I myself spent over 100 hours on The Witcher already (finally able to play it - I'm near the endValkanis said:Do not worry I think you can expect 50 hrs or more. The devs are talking about 90 hrs or more, but I think it's only a marketing
Sweet.kalniel said:+Performance: Incredible as well - runs better than either NWN2 or Gothic3, while looking better. My machine is an X2 3800, 2gb Ram, X1950xt 256mb, XP home. The game auto-detected all settings to MAX (including AA and AF) and it runs completely smoothly at 1680x1050. There's some slight slowdown in cutscenes while it's loading some shader effects or something, but once cached it's smooth again.
I think new models for NPCs might be available in future, as part of new content patches(I've read there are going to be some). So maybe this little "problem" will be watered down a bitDaerdin said:Keep playing and no bugs detected yet. I'm a bit disappointed with the clones, but still it's nice killing them ;D