how nice and polite, i wish the whole thread was like this
Last edited:
- Status
Aside from the people who have motion sickness,I pity someone that's serious about not buying a game due to the first person perspective,without even having seen the game. Sad people
Well guess what buddy you WILL STILL HAVE FPP...This is a way to add TPP as an OPTION NOT REPLACE FPPSorry, but no! I don't want V. to take half of screen space, her/his back is not that important to look at. I know console players love that, but it baffles me why would anyone thing that's a good thing. Talk about sickness, I had HUGE problems playing Batman Arkham City, because I couldn't orient myself and fov was terrible. Batman took HALF of the bloody screen!
I must say that most of the arguments in favor of TPP is very weak and non-factual. It's basically a bunch of people who prefer TPP and are angry because they can't have their way. I would prefer FPP in all games, but I guess most developers don't give a damn about that. As for those who get motion sickness, I understand that.. it's tough, but that's the way it is in life. You can't have everything..
Man, I literally said that I am not worried for Gun Play but for Melee. Just look at the 2013 trailer, how can a character like that be as enjoyable in first person as in third? I don't think it can.
Personally hoping that they'll change their minds about the locked perspectives and make it possible for us to switch between First Person and Third Person, according to personal preference for different situations. In my experience, First Person perspective doesn't lend itself well to certain things, such as melee combat for example.
...yea, and open world, and people spelled IT's doom because of THAT. People know nothing, only the market will tell.
Adding TPP IS essentially replacing FPP as it requires redesigning the game. You cannot just simply tack it on.
Have you played Dying Light? Is Skyrim and Witcher the only games you played in your lifes?
This guy has a really good point. I agree with his sentiment; CDPR have even stated "It's an RPG 'FIRST" which in my mind alleviated the awkwardness of it being FPP. Dying light was FPP and was amazing, to which was also somewhat a FPP RPG. Considering CDPR's track record I highly doubt this game in it's current state will be anything but amazing.
I admit I too was one of those guys who wanted TPP but after a night of thinking, reflecting and listening to the words of CDPR I have since retracted and am in a state of: "Ahh yes this will still be amazing."
With that being said all of you who are still stubborn in wanting TPP....please stop.
Last edited:
Sorry, but no! I don't want V. to take half of screen space, her/his back is not that important to look at. I know console players love that, but it baffles me why would anyone thing that's a good thing. Talk about sickness, I had HUGE problems playing Batman Arkham City, because I couldn't orient myself and fov was terrible. Batman took HALF of the bloody screen!
I must say that most of the arguments in favor of TPP is very weak and non-factual.
Did you play The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt?
Unlikely. I suspect something went wrong during production process, maybe some wrong design decisions, maybe organisation problems (they explicitly said the scale of Cyberpunk is so huge they are going into unknown), maybe great looking things on paper didn't work so well in practice. Each time you make a mistake you waste some time and resources, and at some point you end being forced to cut some things. The same happened to W3 and many, many other games.
This is not so simple. They cannot tell many things publicly, because investors may destroy their finances, because rage and misinformation may destroy their reputation.
This is really though situation for them, but nothing new in this industry.
Keep calm and try to see this situation in wider context.
Can I decide what to do by myself? I think it's my business to dealt with it or not.
I've been reading your comments and have been holding off on saying anything but you are making bold claims about having to redesign a game. If you believe that then god help your soul but I'm not gunna argue with you and that ridiculous statement.
It would probably take time, but 90% of the time it will take is because of the combat system that would have to be remade (because it's strictly linked to mouse pointer to hit and parry).
Provided that this game won't have the same -horrible- system of that one, making a bethesda style third person should not be too hard, and shouldn't require remaking the whole game. It probably wouldnt be great, it will probably take some time and money to do it, but ultimately would make everyone happy.
so what? are u suprised about that, cdpr never was that big about comunication. also i think that they quite honestly could get a couple million more sells bc of the fpp, the amount of casual gamers that enjoy that perspective is quite large i imagin, if u look at what is generally popular around the world
I'm not a game developer but I develop software. You obviously don't know anything about how development works.
Yea, and the TPP wasn't what made the game great... it was just what it was.
Calm down guys, wait until you see the game in motion at least before you ready your pitch forks
Ego perspective works fine in plenty of other rpgs and on a positive note, the world will have to be much more interactive for a FPP to work well so get excited for that
It would be if it was VR.
But combat, expecially melee combat, in first person would be annoying as hell, even if i did not suffer from motion sickness.
Last edited:
It's all well and good but why not choose a top-down-isometric camera CDPR?
What about people with both first person AND third person motion sickness? Hmmm?
Why don't you care about your fanbase like that and how dare you make design decisions that go against what I myself personally like?
Jokes aside, I know people who really suffer from motion sickness in both views, and they can effectively only play games with top-down cameras such as Diablo. What I'm trying to say is : you can never please everybody and have to make decisions.
What about people with both first person AND third person motion sickness? Hmmm?
Why don't you care about your fanbase like that and how dare you make design decisions that go against what I myself personally like?
Jokes aside, I know people who really suffer from motion sickness in both views, and they can effectively only play games with top-down cameras such as Diablo. What I'm trying to say is : you can never please everybody and have to make decisions.
- Status