I understand the choice of design, anyway when faced with a design choice, there are gains, and there are also losses, and it's the same from a narrative point of view, storytelling in the 3rd person, omniscient point of view etc ... CD PROJEKT believe that for their future work that TPP is the best choice possible, I respect their choices. For a player the choice of the point of view is subjective, there are several schools. That being said, they potentially take the risk of losing a number of players for whom having a point of view in TPS most of the time is a prerequisite. There is also a scientific publication from an American university that shows that around 17% of players have different disabilities (dyslexic, cognitive + x pathology) which completely forbids their accessibility in this type of view FPP - FPS . So it's not just a story of taste for everyone. of my point of view , In terms of image and ethics , we must not sweep away this growl with the back of hand. Personally I prefer TPS for various reasons that it is rational from a technical point of view and or irrational of a narrative perspective. In the case of pure immersion from a rather omniscient narrative point of view and an FPS or TPP, I would go directly to the VR version.
François Rabelais say : "science without conscience is but the ruin of the soul"