Jesus... it's so retarded... I'm too intelligent for this.Ooh today is just awesome. Check it out, Wu caught red handed again.
https://pbs.twimg.com/media/B0LIciMCAAAMYIP.png
https://pbs.twimg.com/media/B0LIb6xCUAELR5L.png
Priceless.
I thought the same thing the other day about what I'd heard about misogyny in the radical atheist movement. I have zero sympathy for that demographic, finding them as obnoxious as any other fundamentalist sect, but I realized that I had just tacitly accepted that it was a "hive of misogyny"- as anyone not following it closely would do with GamerGate. Feminists do have a good grip on the narrative.
How does that Wu thing prove she faked the attack? I can't read the tiny little writing on that picture. Plus, Quinn got doxxed for real yesterday on 8chan despite the best efforts of GGers to flood the real doxx away, so there's been some legitimate stuff mixed in there, too. Might be dangerous to start thinking of things in "maybe this is fake" terms given how many messed up fringe people are out there on both sides.
No more dangerous than assuming they're legit. What that print says with the saw pic is irrelevant. She posted it as proof someone was out to get her and that they just started some attack on her, some new campaign, then it turns out the date of the picture was a good bit before she did the MSNBC coverage, which basically means it couldn't have been legit.
But she could have just seen it and assumed it was new without looking at the dates. Hanlon's razor, anyone?
We knew that from the very beginning, though. CameraLady found the info in the "real" doxx a long time ago and verified that the fake was fake (but didn't provide any proof since that would require doxxing her for real).
That's fucked up. We should be better than this.
It says right there in the pic it was four days before the death threats... why is the image just now popping up? As for Zoe Q and Cameralady revealing that, it's the first I've heard of it. I only saw people claiming it was fake. Not that it matters, really. My point still stands. It's some good ol' fashioned situational irony.
That's a good question. "Why does an image made on the 8th reference threats made on the 10th" is also a good question. Let's not pretend to have the answers to those questions before we actually do.
The point is it was made before the actual threats, and is only now getting shown. She posted this just today:
And before you have any concrete proof, making you exactly as bad as the journalists we're fighting against.
So she gets caught actually pretending to be gamergate users as I pointed out earlier, posts a picture that was made before the threats and talks about her campaign against 8chan before the huffington deal, and somehow this is too far fetched, and somehow that makes me just as bad as the journalists flat out lying and saying things about all of gamergate despite the evidence contradicting their claims.
That "satire" comment is vague (it could be construed as "that's not a sockpuppet account, you're just confused because someone's being satirical and you people are idiots") and the "asshat" link is circumstantial at best. As for the rest, how about another theory? You, Unkindled, made both the image and the death threats, then used an alternate account to alert Wu to the image you made on the 8th as though it were new.
