Thx for posting the video. Just watched it a moment ago. I still think she would rather be with Geralt and Yen/Triss. I dont get why she goes for Nilfgaard. Whats her plan when she talks about changing the world? In my eyes no single person could ever change the whole world. Because you have to unit for that. One single person cant rule the world. So one single person cant change the world drastically. But this is just my opinion on that.
Im just glad picking the other end where she starts being a professional witcher.. Wouldnt be fine with that kind of ending. Thinking about her sitting on a throne and dealing with corrupt politicans. Even if it says that Emyr decimated almost every traitor. There will always rise new assholes.
If any person could change the world, it's Ciri. Not only does she have unimaginable powers, she also has a pure heart and thanks to her father she'll soon have the entire continent under her rule. If you want to change the world, this is as good as it gets.
Ciri won't be alone when she sits on the throne. Her father will guide her, her council will guide her and if she really wants she could always ask Geralt, Yennefer or Triss for advice.
While Ciri might be more in her element as a witcher, she'll ultimately be able to do more good as an empress. Geralt is right: "You can't change the world slaying monsters."
I think putting Ciri on the throne of Nilfgaard is definitely the best ending you can get from a global perspective. Whether it's best for Ciri herself is debatable, but you can't deny it will be the best thing to happen for the common people in Nilfgaard and the Northen Kingdoms.
---------- Updated at 10:33 PM ----------
Agreed, I just don't see Ciri as someone who wants to deal with corrupt politicians. Heck I believe she mentioned a few times to Geralt that she just wants to be normal and travel and adventure, go to taverns and drink, things like that.
To me the Empress ending is the "Greater good but sacrificing personal happiness" ending. It's not a bad ending, just not the one I prefer. After all Ciri has been through I prefer the Witcher ending for Ciri. In my opinion it just offers her more freedom to do what she wants on her own terms, and feel more like an adventurer.
You're not wrong, but you're forgetting that Ciri ALSO said that she wants to do something good, something that matters, to make the world a better place. She won't really do much in that regard as a witcher. If she really wants to change the world for the better, she has to sit on that throne in Nilfgaard.
Ultimately it comes down to the fact that Ciri can't have her cake and eat it too. She has to make a decision on what she finds most important for herself; a free life as an adventurer or trying to change the world as an empress.
If you never presented her to Emhyr she will not even be aware of her linage and option to become an empress, thus she becomes an adventurer.
If you do present her to Emhyr she'll eventually choose to become an empress. Maybe she makes the choice because she feels obligated to do so, but ultimately it's her choice that she made for herself, while in the other ending (the witcher Ciri ending) it's not really her own choice at all, but a choice Geralt made for her.