The bottom picture looks great in comparison.
But pictures aren't the same resolution or format.
@Scryar
Where did you get the upper picture?
It's from the uncompressed pax footage.
The bottom picture looks great in comparison.
But pictures aren't the same resolution or format.
@Scryar
Where did you get the upper picture?
Hey. What i noticed. The irden's violet color is realtime in 35 min demo but in GDC and PAX demos its not realtime.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dlq2t91ZUGw#t=18m41s Irden cast violet color around. When Geralt came near his foot become lit from Irden's Violet color.
Why not?Screenshot looks great. However, it confirms that we won't be seeing all the higher res grass anytime soon
Why not?
Things we´ve learned today: 1. Avoid sunsets. 2. Your rig needs all of your savings. Now!
The only footage released thus far said to be on a platform other than PC on high was the griffin hunt shown at the Microsoft E3 2014 conference. A lead dev says it's PC on high, suffixes his statement with a cautionary «I think» and you go and claim that claiming it's PC on high is spreading rumours?
It's PC on high, as Damien tweeted days ago, and hasn't rectified.
I think it's time to come to terms with the fact the game is not going to look significantly better on comparable settings by the time it releases. Sure, one can delude oneself all one wants by thinking that perhaps that was on Xbox One or that there are still 60 magic days for them to crunch up a rabbit out of their hat. I think neither of those consoling thoughts is grounded in reality.
@freakie1one , just to warp our last exchange, you're running into unsupported assumptions you were trying to escape from. You don't know how taxing those effects are, you don't know if those locations are barren by design, etc., so you cannot claim those effects are only deliverable if gameplay elements are turned off - which would amount to saying they are impossible to reproduce under normal conditions - unless you add a few caveats to that assertion.
But moving on.
Your latest comment was obviously tongue-in-cheek. To this, as usual, I offer the facts: of the 16 free DLCs we're getting a beard and hairstyle set, an armour set, and also an alternative look for Yennefer. Hardly earthshaking, As a matter of fact, improving foliage, even if modestly, would arguably have far greater impact on one's experience than any of the mentioned DLCs. While I appreciate your humour, and I do, the suggestion of a PC foliage overhaul actually makes sense.
Hey guys, here's a 4k screenshot from Marcin, go wild. www.bit.ly/WildHunt4K
Hey guys, here's a 4k screenshot from Marcin, go wild. www.bit.ly/WildHunt4K
Another new one:
Hey guys, here's a 4k screenshot from Marcin, go wild. www.bit.ly/WildHunt4K
I think this unnatural look is at least partly due to a dynamic situation cought on a still picture.
I do not understand what is different between grass in two pictures. They look identical. The difference is picture resolution. Look carefully. Same grass and vegetation in same place in both picture.
Now this is funny. If grass is bad in top picture now everybody must say same thing for bottom picture. If grass in bottom picture is good then everybody must admit that they were wrong about grass downgrade.
Hm. I still have my reservations with this one. It´s the same as with the picture from Nowigrad-streets. Somehow everything seems to glow. Strange effect. Not my cup of tea. Strangely enough - I find this to be way too clean. It somehow looks plastic.
That's because it's not an actual screenshot per say. It's more of a doctored up screenshot to make it look like that.