Good fix overall, it will be helpful for sure.
Now like pretty much everyone I'm surprised about a few things.
No change about NR is kinda problematic. Maybe CDPR made what they considered being the most important change first and will release another fix soon with what's necessary to rebalance the armor archetype. I don't know. Hopefully they don't forget about it because it's quiet a ridiculous deck.
I'm also not a huge fan of the change on Harald. Not that the deck didn't needed a buff, it certainly did but I don't think it's healthy for the game to laverage an archetype by making one card OP.
Because let's be honest here, Harald is ridiculous now. He's a minimum of 15 power swing now, possibly even more with the Axeman...I don't know. Maybe I will change my mind when I try it but I feel like they should have changed the Axeman so that they're more reliable rather than making Harald an over powered machine gun.
Not sure about the Dwarven agitator either, was he a problem really? It's not a big deal though. Dwarfs will still be viable, no problem about that.
The rest seem pretty good to me. Nothing make me jump.
In fact, the change about Stammelford is exactly the one I was thinking about. It's a great and healthy change. It makes the spell a lot less abusive than it was without sending it to oblivion so double thumbs up really.
Same thing about the Sage, it might sound like nothing but the fact that he banishes the card he resurrects was a necessity.
Finally, I love the change about the Vrihedd officer. It might feel kinda harsh but it makes the card a ot more tactical to use.
Now you have to make a choice, either you mulligan a Wardancer or a Vanguard and get a small body in return (but develop your board more effectively) or you go for Brigade and make a big ass fatty. I like it.