Other way is correct. As longer a round is played the better it is for skellig player. Skellig prepares in round 1 the later rounds, so you more time you give him to do that, the stronger is round 2 and round 3. Skellig waste less ressources then you in round 1, because his ressources are stronger when they are in graveyard. When you go with skellig player in Round 3 and both player has only 1 card then i say that skellig player wins to 90% the match.Laveley;n7125540 said:Go all in first round against them. They will eventually loose the round and waste precious resources on the meantime. If you give up first around and pass early against them than its pretty much gg.
I've done well against Skellige Gravediggers going in all wild during rd1 and pushing for victory in rd2.Lexandre;n7125680 said:however continuing to play cards on round 1 while skellige player has 2 card advantage and im 20-30 unit strength ahead feels stupid and even then i cant risk to pass before the skellige player because he can win the round playing 1-2 cards and then i wont get the value of auto-include ciri and instead the skellige player will get the full value from their ciri further increasing the card advantage gap between us
I strongly disagree with this.shdcs1975;n7128060 said:Other way is correct. As longer a round is played the better it is for skellig player. Skellig prepares in round 1 the later rounds, so you more time you give him to do that, the stronger is round 2 and round 3. Skellig waste less ressources then you in round 1, because his ressources are stronger when they are in graveyard. When you go with skellig player in Round 3 and both player has only 1 card then i say that skellig player wins to 90% the match.
I usually pick a queensguard instead of the skirmisherSerotonergic;n7129540 said:Yeah, Skellige does feel like pretty brainless dumb stuff if you don't have both card advantage and the counter for the inevitable last turn Restoration -> Sig -> Priestess -> Skirmisher. Well, actually, I just thought of one way to counter it that doesn't need card advantage with a certain Scoia cad no one runs, but I actually do in mine. But itself is easily countered.
It definitely aint beatable with just ONE deck or ONE faction. To my knowledge, there are 4 somewhat competitive builds right now; skellige discard, nr rez chain, nr promote and scoia spell control. You could include more but i think these 4 builds are in the top of the food chain right now and every one of these builds can beat one another depending on player skill and, obviously, luck. Some builds are better than others to counter specific ones, yes, but thats pretty much it, it doesnt mean that you can only beat skellige discard with scoia control, although its definitely easier.Esclive;n7131190 said:because if it's just beatable with only ONE deck or ONE faction,
You are right. You should win round 1, but u must do it without playing so much ressources. Then Pass round 2 and beat him in round 3.Laveley;n7130160 said:I strongly disagree with this.
If skellige wins first round without spending resources, they can cook you on second and than prepare on round 2, on round 3 them they are unbeatable. If you force them to spend a lot of resources on round 1 and they still loose it, they will be forced to spend their game winning bombs on round 2 that should be used on the final round.
And so the other competitive NR builds.gametheoryguy;n7135000 said:The entire problem currently is the bomb (I made a rant about that card.) Right now, this deck is bad because it can't beat the card advantage deck. But that deck is getting nerfed into the ground, so after that I think you may have a point. Bomb stops literally every possible counter to this deck, and it's main bad matchup is getting butchered.
Another problem I found from your sentence, there's pretty much no luck needed in the Skellige discard deck since he can have 95% of his deck available at some point so that's one of the main element of a Card Game that doesn't apply to him.Laveley;n7131290 said:every one of these builds can beat one another depending on player skill and, obviously, luck.
It applies to their opponent. If their opponent gets a godlike hand will probably beat him. Also, it does matter the order that you draw your cards.Esclive;n7139600 said:Another problem I found from your sentence, there's pretty much no luck needed in the Skellige discard deck since he can have 95% of his deck available at some point so that's one of the main element of a Card Game that doesn't apply to him.