ser2440;n10960745 said:Τhat combo is problematic in that regard, in the sense that there is no real counterplay that does not involve losing a metric ton of points yourself. The best you can do is aim for a short round 3 (decks that run this combo literally have no other power play beyond that) where it's subpar to say the least. If they play their spy immediately when you've lost the coinflip, and then they use that combo, they are still 1 card down in order to win round 1. Other than that, spread your big units around. Don't keep them on the same row.
Esmer;n10964786 said:Lately I saw this combo only in reveal decks. That means that when you are on a blue coin, you either go 2 cards down to win R1 or lose it on equal cards (or you drypass and risk losing both rounds). So unless you have high tempo plays in R2, you go into R3 2 cards down (because he spies you back), so your opponent has a perfect opportunity to play Letho + Regis in R3.
Anyway, I think the problem is not Letho + Regis, but 23 points Morvran (2 golems + 2 scorpions). That's even worse than Brouver -> Barclay -> Cleaver since the combo is more flexible (you can spread scorpions' damage or replace scorpions with daerlan footsoldiers when you need less points to be ahead).
ser2440;n10964828 said:If you go on Round 3, even a card down, but with only 3 cards, chances are one is a fire scorpion, another is a blind Villentretenmerth they have to play immediately (and with the lack of targets, they might be forced to damage the only villentretenmerth target on your end) or a risky yennefer: enchantress into scorch. If you won R1, they play first, so even a card up, their scorpions have no targets, and yen will scorch herself.
Esmer;n10965290 said:We were talking about Letho + Regis, and suddenly there's Villy and Yen.
Moreover, I was saying he will spy you back (to be clear, in R3), so when you go into R3 with -1CA, your opponent still has a perfect opportunity to play Letho + Regis. So I guess the best option is forcing him to play either part of the combo in R2. But again, that won't be easy when you lose a coin flip and have to go -2CA in R1.
Jeydra;n10967126 said:You can sort of counter Letho/Regis by row stacking. If you're able to fill the row, they can't play Letho, and Regis has no good targets either (but woe be to you if they aren't actually running Letho/Regis and instead have Hailstorm + Yenn: Enchantress to recast it).
Aside from that, you can sort of counter Letho/Regis by using a powerful last-turn play. In particular Miruna is excellent against Letho/Regis because Regis doesn't do enough to kill her, and if she triggers she'll probably provide enough of a swing to win. Just try to play her on a row which the opponent can't use Letho on.
Finally Letho/Regis is only effective if they're both drawn, so opponents will probably run a great amount of thinning. You can conceivably beat them then with a card like Avallach - just play him last, when the opponent has already thinned to no cards in deck.
Of course these aren't exactly ideal counters, which is why I created a thread some time ago suggesting the combo should be changed or better counterplay added.
You use that word "counter"... I do not think it means what you think it means
You use that word "counter"... I do not think it means what you think it means
Nice analogy you've got there.using mandrake on Letho is like cutting off your arm if you get bit by a zombie.... sure you're not a zombie, but you've still lost an arm.
(it's a was a line borrowed from the movie "The Princess Bride")
... to counter it you would need to both prevent your opponents gain of points, AND your loss... using mandrake on Letho is like cutting off your arm if you get bit by a zombie.... sure you're not a zombie, but you've still lost an arm.