Forums
Games
Cyberpunk 2077 Thronebreaker: The Witcher Tales GWENT®: The Witcher Card Game The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt The Witcher 2: Assassins of Kings The Witcher The Witcher Adventure Game
Jobs Store Support Log in Register
Forums - CD PROJEKT RED
Menu
Forums - CD PROJEKT RED
  • Hot Topics
  • NEWS
  • GENERAL
    SUGGESTIONS
  • STORY
    MAIN JOBS SIDE JOBS GIGS
  • GAMEPLAY
  • TECHNICAL
    PC XBOX PLAYSTATION
  • COMMUNITY
    FAN ART (THE WITCHER UNIVERSE) FAN ART (CYBERPUNK UNIVERSE) OTHER GAMES
  • RED Tracker
    The Witcher Series Cyberpunk GWENT
FAN ART (THE WITCHER UNIVERSE)
FAN ART (CYBERPUNK UNIVERSE)
OTHER GAMES
Menu

Register

How many gigabytes does it take to make a human?

+
  • 1
  • 2
Next
1 of 2

Go to page

Next Last
B

braindancer12

Rookie
#1
Jul 5, 2014
How many gigabytes does it take to make a human?

How much information is stored inside a human? Not as much as you think. All you need is a mere 1.5 gigabytes to fit your entire genetic code.

Of course, we have a lot of cells in our body (around 40 trillion) and each of those cells contain the full 1.5 GB of our genetic code. So a real person has about 60 zettabytes (60 with 21 zeroes after) of information in total. Thats huge. In the year 2020 all the digital information in the world will only tally up to 40 ZB. So turns out, there's a lot of information necessary to make a person.

But! 99.9% of our genetic information is shared with everyone else on Earth. What makes us unique is much, much smaller than a ZB. In fact, it takes less than a megabyte to make a person different from the next.
So there it is. A reasonable 1.5GB of information for our genetic code. A ridiculous 60ZB flowing in all our bodies. And an embarrassingly tiny megabyte that makes us believe we're a unique snowflake.

Here is the video with all the informations, pretty interesting......

 
  • RED Point
Reactions: Sardukhar
LexAnarchy

LexAnarchy

Rookie
#2
Jul 5, 2014
Wow, that's interesting! Thanks for posting.
 
Suhiira

Suhiira

Forum veteran
#3
Jul 5, 2014
What I found interesting was the last bit where they were talking about spoken words having been "recorded" by the environment and the potential for recovering them.

Imagine being able to hear Aristotle?
 
Sardukhar

Sardukhar

Moderator
#4
Jul 5, 2014
suhiir said:
What I found interesting was the last bit where they were talking about spoken words having been "recorded" by the environment and the potential for recovering them.

Imagine being able to hear Aristotle?
Click to expand...
Oh, Suzy. You're so smrt.

I was thinking, "imagine being able to hear myself at ages 5, 10 and 15. Or my parents and friends."

Retrospective movie-making for the Selfie generation.

also handy for crime-solving.

And could be a cool Cyberpunk mission to recover/hack something like this.

I -really- need to start writing these down and run something...
 
P

Poet_and_Gentleman.598

Rookie
#5
Jul 6, 2014
It would be cool to have ONE mission of this. Not more though.
 
D

dragonbird

Ex-moderator
#6
Jul 6, 2014
Sardukhar said:
Oh, Suzy. You're so smrt.

I was thinking, "imagine being able to hear myself at ages 5, 10 and 15. Or my parents and friends."

Retrospective movie-making for the Selfie generation.

also handy for crime-solving.

And could be a cool Cyberpunk mission to recover/hack something like this.

I -really- need to start writing these down and run something...
Click to expand...
That's annoying me - what film was that again?
 
wisdom000

wisdom000

Forum veteran
#7
Jul 6, 2014
Frequency
 
227

227

Forum veteran
#8
Jul 6, 2014
Wow, Ben Affleck is smarter than I expected.
 
D

dragonbird

Ex-moderator
#9
Jul 6, 2014
No, it wasn't Frequency (a film that, incidentally, I watched while in hospital. It seemed to be on every time I turned on the TV)

So I gave up on you lot and looked it up. It's amazing the way that a Google search on "film where all memories are recorded" actually works.
The Final Cut. (Looks like there are others too, but that's the one I was thinking of)
 
Suhiira

Suhiira

Forum veteran
#10
Jul 6, 2014
Sardukhar said:
I was thinking, "imagine being able to hear myself at ages 5, 10 and 15. Or my parents and friends."
Click to expand...
Merely a matter of taste and sophistication.
No one expect either from a Cannuck so don't worry about it, eh?
 
Sardukhar

Sardukhar

Moderator
#11
Jul 6, 2014
Just one "n" in Canuck.

Oh, Marines. Still the blunt end of the spear, eh? Eh?

There was another show where you had to use some kind of time-echo to solve crimes or spy on yourself...not Memento, although that was a neat take on memory and crime..virtualization of a human..

Hmm.

Freejack was pretty cool, but not really the same..

Source Code! http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0945513/?ref_=nm_flmg_act_9

That was cool.

Human as information..mostly.
 
Suhiira

Suhiira

Forum veteran
#12
Jul 6, 2014
I prefer it with two.
Can-nuck ... sorta like Can-not ... or is it Can-naught?

Besides, remember:

Muscles
Are
Required
Intelligence
Not
Essential
 
  • RED Point
Reactions: Sardukhar
animalfather

animalfather

Forum veteran
#13
Jul 6, 2014
over 9000
 
S

Sasza

Rookie
#14
Jul 6, 2014
I dont really see the phenomenon of the video so what the guy did is at first he very briefly talked about the binary code then he analyzed some data concerning human DNA code and figured out how much space would the text containg our DNA take in difital form. At last he said something which again is supposed to be a common knowledge namely that by talking we emit voice waves and he suggested that perhaps some day somebody will figure out the way to retrieve it?

All in all whatever we can what can expect in the near future I'm sure this guy is on it:

[video]http://www.ted.com/talks/ray_kurzweil_get_ready_for_hybrid_thinking[/video]
 
Suhiira

Suhiira

Forum veteran
#15
Jul 7, 2014
What got my attention was the amount of data that would need to be transmitted to do the classic Star Trek Teleporter.
Considering it's generally used with no receiving station at the point to arrival how the hell do you transmit that much data to "nothing" and reassemble a person?
 
fchopin

fchopin

Forum veteran
#16
Jul 8, 2014
That was interesting, thank you op.
 
TheCybersmily

TheCybersmily

Senior user
#17
Jul 8, 2014
suhiir said:
What got my attention was the amount of data that would need to be transmitted to do the classic Star Trek Teleporter.
Considering it's generally used with no receiving station at the point to arrival how the hell do you transmit that much data to "nothing" and reassemble a person?
Click to expand...
The transporter in Trek or the concept really makes me wonder if you are reassembling or creating a new being with everything you were at the point in time you got zapped. The whole thing about whether there is the concept of a soul and if there is, does it go with all those atoms. Or does the process create a new soul. Or does it create an empty husk of who you were. Alright, I 'm getting too deep for this late hour of writing this post.
 
227

227

Forum veteran
#18
Jul 8, 2014
cybersmily said:
The whole thing about whether there is the concept of a soul and if there is, does it go with all those atoms. Or does the process create a new soul. Or does it create an empty husk of who you were. Alright, I 'm getting too deep for this late hour of writing this post.
Click to expand...
Whenever another you is created, it's always an evil twin. Always. Unspoken rule of the universe.

Since the vast majority of information in people is redundant, I wonder if there'd be some way of having all of that redundant information draw from a single source like a bunch of desktop shortcuts?
 
Suhiira

Suhiira

Forum veteran
#19
Jul 8, 2014
Most likely.
 
Hoplite_22

Hoplite_22

Senior user
#20
Jul 8, 2014
What really boggled my mind was that things where unreplicatable but you could transport them.
 
  • 1
  • 2
Next
1 of 2

Go to page

Next Last
Share:
Facebook Twitter Reddit Pinterest Tumblr WhatsApp Email Link
  • English
    English Polski (Polish) Deutsch (German) Русский (Russian) Français (French) Português brasileiro (Brazilian Portuguese) Italiano (Italian) 日本語 (Japanese) Español (Spanish)

STAY CONNECTED

Facebook Twitter YouTube
CDProjekt RED Mature 17+
  • Contact administration
  • User agreement
  • Privacy policy
  • Cookie policy
  • Press Center
© 2018 CD PROJEKT S.A. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED

The Witcher® is a trademark of CD PROJEKT S. A. The Witcher game © CD PROJEKT S. A. All rights reserved. The Witcher game is based on the prose of Andrzej Sapkowski. All other copyrights and trademarks are the property of their respective owners.

Forum software by XenForo® © 2010-2020 XenForo Ltd.