I wonder what xp we'll get for killing a goosegoose
I wonder what xp we'll get for killing a goosegoose
You couldn't be more wrong.Well, wolves are (generally?) not domestic animals. If you meet a wild wolf (not white) in real life it's going to attack you as well.
For some reason this reminded me of Divinity where if you kill x number of rabbits a giant one comes out and kicks you arse...I wonder what xp we'll get for killing a goose![]()
You ever see the movie The Grey with Liam Neeson?You couldn't be more wrong.
The vast majority of wild wolves do not see humans as a source of food. They will usually be afraid of humans and at most curious. They will most of the time run away from humans, you need only read about the people who's job it is to "study" wild wolves or who work in areas with them (IE Parks).
When wolves have attacked humans in the wild it's mostly been the case of Rabid wolves, sick wolves, or they attack a very small human who's alone.
There's details on that here:I am hoping it W3 I dont have to level Geralt from a level 1 character with no skills. At this point Geralt should be an elite Witcher with all his skills and lots to do with them. New special skills could be added in a context sensitive way.
I remember reading that wolves have a radius that if you pass it they become alarmed and start growling to warn you away, and then a second radius that once you pass it, they attack - so at least with them you should be able to navigate around if you'd like. But probably walking straight up to a pack will aggro it.I am hoping it W3 I dont have to level Geralt from a level 1 character with no skills. At this point Geralt should be an elite Witcher with all his skills and lots to do with them. New special skills could be added in a context sensitive way.
Also I hope that the devs can accommodate people who get no satisfaction from killing random wildlife that suicidally attack you. It took a years for a proper solution for this in Skyrim and in the end a single modder made One With Nature. It was easy to do, but Beth chose not to.
In Witcher is would be as simple as the player choosing to give Geralt a Power or amulet that prevents wolves from attacking suicidally and constantly.
Players could choose not to have this power.
Specific wolves could still be aggressive as required by the plot for a specific reason.
Wolves could still attack if Geralt is heavily injured.
I bet that they put in some joke about fetch-quests, like they did with Elthon.Geralt could have something snarky to say if asked to go on a wolf killing quest like "I am a monster hunter not a #%^% wolf hunter .... go hire a hunter"
I'm not a fan of killing wolves and would be very happy if there's an option to feed them instead, like getting some chicken/goose meat and feed those wolves :cheers2:It is good that you love wolves so much because if you choose not to kill them, you'll be choosing to feed them instead.
Err, no. Wolves, like all predatory animals, make a very big deal about energy conservation. They don't chase after what they don't think they can catch. They won't go hunting when they've just eaten, it's just a waste of good calories. In terms of threat to the humans, wolves are behind moose. Herbivores in general tend to be a lot more dangerous to humans than carnivores, partially because people don't take them seriously as a threat, but also because they work on a completely different set of rules. Carnivores only come after you hungry or provoked, while herbivores are more likely to attack you preemptively, just because you're there and they don't want you around, especially when they're in heat.They kill what they can, and avoid being killed. Sometimes they eat it, other times it's just for killing's sake. It's instinct, so we can't blame the wolf.
Err, no. Wolves, like all predatory animals, make a very big deal about energy conservation. They don't chase after what they don't think they can catch. They won't go hunting when they've just eaten, it's just a waste of good calories. In terms of threat to the humans, wolves are behind moose. Herbivores in general tend to be a lot more dangerous to humans than carnivores, partially because people don't take them seriously as a threat, but also because they work on a completely different set of rules. Carnivores only come after you hungry or provoked, while herbivores are more likely to attack you preemptively, just because you're there and they don't want you around, especially when they're in heat.
In terms of today, yes, but in the past, and especially in a medieval setting like the Witcher series, this certainly wasn't the case at all, even as late as the 1600s several thousand people were killed by wolves throughout Europe each year I believe, and in France wolf attacks became somewhat of an epidemic at one point. We can't let our 21st century world, with humans largely confined to areas outside the territory of wolves, and centuries of culling wolves in situations we find them to be dangerous, make us forget that once wolves were much more of a threat to people.In terms of threat to the humans, wolves are behind moose. .