The main problem i see with these kinda threads is that people look at videogames and think that their views should be reflected onto the game to be viable as a game to them (eg: If i'm not represented in the game i don't care about it, so the game should change), while it's been the other way around for a long time.
Women couldn't vote for a long time and yet, here we are. Just because things used to be something doesn't void it from evolving and improving.
We can all agree when Tomb Raider came out the majority of gamers were male (i don't have accurate data but that's the reality i grew up into) and nobody minded that there was no male protagonist option because that's what a game is supposed to do: Depict a character to which you can grow attached to, regardless of gender.
Let's not forgot how Lara Croft was portrayed with her unrrealistic proportions for a very long time. While I will forever adore classic Lara for being a strong independant woman (traits she lost with the reboot era) and for pushing female representation forward, her look is what was used through most of her promotional material unfortunately and probably why it was more welcomed.
We play for the story, for the gameplay, to be amazed and surprised, not to promote politics or opinions.
In short: I believe a game CAN be inclusive, that doesn't mean it HAS to be. And it can nonetheless be an enjoyable experience.
Asking for better acknowledgement and awareness of who we are is not "politic", it's just common human decency. Your entire arguments also fall flat since C2077 aims at being a player-driven experience where you build your own character and experience your own journey. We were told there would be a fair split, we all paid (or will pay) for the game, we're all equal customers. So I don't see why we shouldn't express our concerns. We all want to enjoy the game equally here. I'm also not implying the enjoyment of the game or its quality boils down to representation, but when we see hetero male players having more perks and a deeper experience (because of wider story options) for the same price we paid, it's unfair.
Nobody here is asking for LGBT/Female fair representations in every game that exist. Sometime yes, the storyline and the player character will be defined by its story (Uncharted, Watch_Dogs 1, Resident Evil 7, etc)
But Cyberpunk is a
RPG, and it offers numerous features that target a specific gender and sexual orientation and give second treatment for the rest. So either they commit at giving equal choices to everyone as they said they would and as the genre implies, or they pick side and own it through and stop all the smoke and mirrors about player options in its marketing campaign.
You should play Dragon Age: Inquisition. That's romance and representation done right.
Countless titles do that if you just can't stand the direction of a particular game, there are options you can choose from.
It's ok to make your opinion heard, it's not ok to impose yourself.
So basically a "take it or leave it" situation. Disappointing argument. I must also point out the irony of saying we should not "impose ourselves" yet there you are, dictacting how things should be according to you.