Moderator: Don't like your tone. Cool it. Before your account is adversely affected.
Fine. I give up.
Edit: I'm sorry that you obviously feel cheated, but I'd caution you to not take it personally.
Last edited:
Ok, I'll moderate it. I was asking for respect for my opinions as I do for others. I haven't insult anyone or have said that the opinion of others are bullshit
Last edited:
At 80 000 views on this thread, I will do another fanart of Iorveth and Saskia : )
Anyways guys, I was trying to download REDkit hoping that I would be able to export models like Vergen(if it can be done) to have some decent setting, but the links to part 4 and 5 are not working.
Are you experiencing these issues as well?
Anyways guys, I was trying to download REDkit hoping that I would be able to export models like Vergen(if it can be done) to have some decent setting, but the links to part 4 and 5 are not working.
Are you experiencing these issues as well?
I'm making a custom armor for Geralt
Anyway i should have all the TW2 files uncooked on my desktop, what do you need? All vergen?
is that iorveth's armor?I'm making a custom armor for Geralt
Yup, i had to cut the dress because there's too much clipping.
Oh and Toyen, there are hundreds of files :ugh:
I don't know if with Redkit you could export the entire area but here i have a file for every wall, roof, chair etc..
You basically have to rebuild Vergen by hand with these files
Last edited:
an armor, work in progress it looks like the iorveth's armor
anyway, why can't you open the images?
It may simply be related to the location (Temeria) and story of the game why Roche was chosen over Iorveth.
OK, for all your love for Iorveth you seem to get all the basic facts about him completely wrong. Iorveth aiding a country who already once used and betrayed Scoia'tael (and used them again in not direct way in Witcher 2) and almost executed him for his loyal duty? Give me a break. He would rather gather the remaining Scoia'tael forces and oppose the Nilfgaard invasion, as he knows there is no way he could count on the Emhyr's mercy.
For me both fight for the freedom of your country and freedom of your people are very basic and easy to follow concepts (and Roche is not any less complex then Iorveth), so that's definitely not a case. It just made more sense for Roche to be there, so when it turned out they were unable to do everything they wanted and needed to cut some things out, they had to make a choice.
(And I still don't get it why anyone expected Iorveth in Toussaint, the Nilfgaard territory, where there is no Scoia'tael, or that they're going to shoehorn him into the expansion story they already came up with before the game release, even if there is absolutely no place for him there, just because some people asked about it.)
They should've released it as an expansion to TW2. I wanted to see Francesca and Isengrim, dammit! :cirisad:
I know what I'm saying. Using your own words, why Roche is helping Nilfgaard to win a war when is the same country that is butchering his own people? Because is the only option to "free" Temeria (a poor option IMO). If we would had heard this argument before the game was released many of us would had said that is impossible. Roche would never do that. But at the end, that was what CDPR wanted to happen. If this can be done, you can put Iorveth again with Nilfgaard. Reasons? The only way to save his people. Is a silly argument? The same as Roche
As I said, almost every character from TW2 could fit in TW3. And Iorvet fit until he was cut in 2014. Reasons? My assumptions is that Iorveth is a more complex character than Roche and that's why he was removed. In the context of TW3 he could support Nilfgaard, he could keep the fight against humans or he could have left the fight after Vergen was destroyed (which requires explain what was Vergen, something that never happened in TW3) but, on the other hand, after the invasion, Roche is one simpe option: Temeria, Temeria and Temeria.
In the end, the diference between my opinion and your opinion is that we think differently. Probably you thing that TW3 is an awesome game and I think that is a game which betray many of the core values of TW2 in order to attract players. And that's something that everyone can understand, even me, but not putting at least Iorveht just for a quest is too much. And I think we can't agree on that
---------- Updated at 12:48 PM ----------
Any chance to recover those deleted files from 2014? To see how Iorveth would look like in TW3. Thanks in advanceIt still needs a bit of work
Last edited:
Bad news for TW2 fans
Looks like Iorveth or Saskia ain't coming in TW3.
Thanks for breaking our hearts @Marcin Momot :'(
Looks like Iorveth or Saskia ain't coming in TW3.
Thanks for breaking our hearts @Marcin Momot :'(
The thing with Temeria is that it first suffered through a civil war, regicide and war with Nilfgaard one after another and through careful exploration of No Man's Land you can see how much damage has been caused by that conflict to the kingdom. That's why Vernon tries to reach the compromise with Emhyr instead of keep fighting until there will be no Temeria left to save. That's also creates a conflict between Roche and Dijkstra, as Redania wasn't affected by the war that much, so Sigi has still a plenty to lose, while Roche is left with almost nothing. Iorveth on the other hand already tried that option, so it's unlikely for him to repeat the same mistake twice.
And the truth behind removal of Iorveth (among many other things) is very simple: lack of money to finish it, no other insane theory needed. I doubt anyone would be satisfied if they left in the game the Iorveth stuff they already completed.
I'm sorry. If that makes you feel any better, I sided with Iorveth too
While that doesn't make me feel better, I am at least now safely assured that you are a person with good taste. :victory:I'm sorry. If that makes you feel any better, I sided with Iorveth too