And? We still don't know what transpired. At all. In fiction, when something happens off screen, someone else provides the information necessary for the viewer/reader to follow the plot. It doesn't happen here. This is a dead end.
I'm talking about the books.First,she seduced Geralt with magic ,than she refused to help her in Tower of Swallow.She didn't even bother to clear Yen's name for Geralt,instead Fringilla Vigo did that.With friends like Triss you don't need enemies.
And yet Yen somehow tolerates her. Stupid woman.
You know, this is actually what I think the threesome was. Because it is horribly out of character, especially for Yennefer.
Yen would just fucking nuke Geralt, new Triss would just leave and Geralt wouldn't be stupid enough to even consider the idea. So yeah, if it's not a joke, then the writing crew did some witcher style boozing with a side dish of fisstech.
It's one of the unwritten laws of the universe that every thread concerning on of those ladies will inevitably include the other in a verbal equivalent of a cage match to the death.
Most of the people who dislike Yen, compare her with Triss. And in order for us Yen-fans to defend her, we must counter with facts about Triss. And many facts come from the books. But, it seems a lot of people just ignore the books, even though they are the absolute truth to the characters' backgrounds.
I don't think Yen would have nuked him. She would have given him so well chosen words. But, considering the circumstances, she would not have dumped him. Because, as I've mentioned earlier, Geralt didn't actually spend that much time with Triss anyway. Yen wouldn't have cast aside their long shared history because of that short fling.
Or you could defend Yen on the basis of her character and actions. It's not like it's hard to see past the ice and spikes and two wrongs never made a right.
Figure of speech. That situation would have never came up in any world where Geralt is not permanently drunk, so it's pointless to guess what would have happened
While its true that the game was based off the books it is still his own thing which is why most people could afford to never touch the books and still immerse themselves into the game world, i didnt read the books yet although i plan to, so the only Yen i know is the one i have heard about and seen in game , same goes for Triss , Geralt , Dandelion , Zoltan ( are the latter two in the books ? ) etc....so until i read it the book simply doesnt exist from where i am standing.
I have defended Yen's actions and given explanations to them many times earlier in this thread.
But you just said you're "countering with facts about Triss"?
Yup, but that came later, after everyone else started talking about Triss in relation to Yen.
Yes, of course. You can treat the game as their own entity. But, a lot of people talk shit about Yennefer, without thinking why she might act a certain way. And, in the books one can find out why she is like she is.
Well the OP actually did start off the thread with an on the surface comparison between the two. This of course led to a lengthy discussion as the characters aren't quite so 2-Dimensional.
I'll entertain your comment.
In TW3 she was coming across a bit sickingly sweet....just a little bit. But thinking about everything she did to get Geralt to be hers makes her rather enduring. I guess Geralt does have a thing for manipulative sorceresses. 
