Is This The META of Exaggeration?
Considering what we see, what ppl. discuss/post/complain or give feedback and suggestions upon, is this the meta of exaggeration?
Because we see in a constant rate huge str units now. From Bronzes that reach 15 to 30 str, silvers too like Morkvarg, Golds like Tibor and so on. I think we have to think carefully what should be nerfed and what not. The more i realize that, only an exaggeration can beat another one. If one nerfs Tibor, how can you then counter the "ridiculousness" of other cards? If you nerf everything does that bring balance? I can't place it for sure but i do know more refining is needed. I still believe this meta is far more interesting and exciting than the previous one.
There's a thin line between nerfing and balancing, quite obscured and we have to kind of, tread lightly. I mean, i don't know the exact impact of what we, as players, have on the game when we complain about one thing over another. CDPR is checking the overall feedback in Forums/Reddit etc. and then, they also have data analytics and stats. When i come across something i can't beat or counter efficiently, i wonder if it was me or the game. Sometimes i think we are too egocentric to notice the fact that losing hurts our ego mostly, it's a subconscious mechanism that blurs our objectivity.
And objectivity is crucial for the overall gameplay experience of everyone, not just our own precious deck or Faction. I am having fun when there's interactivity by both sides on the board, when one answers to the other one, when matches are close and every time i loose i find myself learning so much more and that's the most valuable thing for me...losing for the shake of getting better. And there are these times were i find myself auto-forfeit. Rarely but, this meta brought some deck and cards that have no interaction on the board, pure "no-fun" decks but the rewards are to high to not play them i guess. I can't do it but i understand why it is done by some.
I mean, from my perspective, were i love NG, i don't think NG must be nerfed but all the other Factions should catch up to them. Perhaps i am wrong, as i said i don't know what the data analytics are showing but they also need more time for the data to be more precise and then they can move and basically nail it in the next patch.
Having said that, i urge people to keep on giving feedback and not just post, "Stop playing this or that". I hate Scoia Spell with just 3 units in the deck and i hate netdecking but you know what? Everything gives them data, so do everything and anything you think is good for you.
HF
Considering what we see, what ppl. discuss/post/complain or give feedback and suggestions upon, is this the meta of exaggeration?
Because we see in a constant rate huge str units now. From Bronzes that reach 15 to 30 str, silvers too like Morkvarg, Golds like Tibor and so on. I think we have to think carefully what should be nerfed and what not. The more i realize that, only an exaggeration can beat another one. If one nerfs Tibor, how can you then counter the "ridiculousness" of other cards? If you nerf everything does that bring balance? I can't place it for sure but i do know more refining is needed. I still believe this meta is far more interesting and exciting than the previous one.
There's a thin line between nerfing and balancing, quite obscured and we have to kind of, tread lightly. I mean, i don't know the exact impact of what we, as players, have on the game when we complain about one thing over another. CDPR is checking the overall feedback in Forums/Reddit etc. and then, they also have data analytics and stats. When i come across something i can't beat or counter efficiently, i wonder if it was me or the game. Sometimes i think we are too egocentric to notice the fact that losing hurts our ego mostly, it's a subconscious mechanism that blurs our objectivity.
And objectivity is crucial for the overall gameplay experience of everyone, not just our own precious deck or Faction. I am having fun when there's interactivity by both sides on the board, when one answers to the other one, when matches are close and every time i loose i find myself learning so much more and that's the most valuable thing for me...losing for the shake of getting better. And there are these times were i find myself auto-forfeit. Rarely but, this meta brought some deck and cards that have no interaction on the board, pure "no-fun" decks but the rewards are to high to not play them i guess. I can't do it but i understand why it is done by some.
I mean, from my perspective, were i love NG, i don't think NG must be nerfed but all the other Factions should catch up to them. Perhaps i am wrong, as i said i don't know what the data analytics are showing but they also need more time for the data to be more precise and then they can move and basically nail it in the next patch.
Having said that, i urge people to keep on giving feedback and not just post, "Stop playing this or that". I hate Scoia Spell with just 3 units in the deck and i hate netdecking but you know what? Everything gives them data, so do everything and anything you think is good for you.
HF