Just installed Cyberpunk 2077 (PC) confused on graphic setting

+
I just upgraded my PC and purchased Cyberpunk 2077, can't wait to play it. I was looking into the graphic settings and I'm confused as to which setting will give me the absolute highest visuals. Will running it on "Custom" with DLSS off and putting everything else to their highest setting be the best? I thought I read somewhere that choosing "Raytracing Overdrive" gives the best visual detail, but I noticed it automatically turns DLSS Super Resolution on. I took a short video of both settings im talking about below. Is Custom supposed to be best, or Raytracing Overdrive? Was hoping someone could chime in and clear the confusion. Thanks.

Custom

Raytracing Overdrive
 
Ray Tracing Overdrive would arguably offer best visuals ;)
Light effects will be way better. You might also set DLSS on quality and activate frame generation if your rig can handle it.
 
Thanks for the reply, so if I set it to Ray Tracing Overdrive but then change anything on the settings below it like DLSS to quality or Screen Space Reflections from Ultra to Psycho, then the first Ray Tracing Overdrive setting at the top goes back to "Custom". That what is confusing me, does it still retain the Ray Tracing Overdrive setting even though it now shows Custom again?
 
Thanks for the reply, so if I set it to Ray Tracing Overdrive but then change anything on the settings below it like DLSS to quality or Screen Space Reflections from Ultra to Psycho, then the first Ray Tracing Overdrive setting at the top goes back to "Custom". That what is confusing me, does it still retain the Ray Tracing Overdrive setting even though it now shows Custom again?
I think so. "Ray Tracing Overdrive" is just the name of the preset, it automatically switch to "custom" if you change at least one setting. So everything should be the same as the Ray Tracing Overdrive preset, except what you changed yourself.
 
Last edited:
I think so. "Ray Tracing Overdrive" is just the name of the preset, it automatically switch to "custom" if you change at least one setting. So everything should be the same as the Ray Tracing Overdrive preset, except what you changed yourself.

This. It's entirely normal.

The same would happen if you turned everything to low and then changed shadows to ultra. It would show as custom because the game does not recognize these specific setting as a preset. It's your custom settings.
 
Don't worry about what the preset says. The only thing about the highest settings is that from memory you can't use ray reconstruction (which is more advanced than "normal" path tracing) without DLSS being switched on. So you need to make a choice between the best lighting the game has to offer and the best overall visual quality. The side effects of DLSS are much less noticeable at 1440p and 4k. But at 1080p it has a quite pronounced effect on visual quality in the sense of softness requiring a lot of sharpening and some artefacting.
 
Last edited:
Don't worry about what the preset says. The only thing about the highest settings is that from memory you can't use ray reconstruction (which is more advanced than "normal" path tracing) without DLSS being switched on. So you need to make a choice between the best lighting the game has to offer and the best overall visual quality. The side effects of DLSS are much less noticeable at 1440p and 4k. But at 1080p it has a quite pronounced effect on visual quality in the sense of softness requiring a lot of sharpening and some artefacting.

That's not entirely accurate.

Ray Reconstruction isn't a more advanced form of Path Tracing. PT is an advanced form of ray tracing. RR isn't ray tracing, it's denoising.

Ray Reconstruction's main aim is to remove the visual noise that Ray tracing naturally causes. Unless a patch changed that, RR cannot be turned on without DLSS as it is part of DLSS. RR is supposed to be a better denoiser than traditional methods of denoising (spatial and temporal) but people are divided on it since it has it's own set of side effects.

Path tracing will produce the best graphic fidelity. RR is meant to further improve it by providing better quality denoising but the actual light ray simulation comes from ray tracing/path tracing.

With that said, OP, without knowing what kind of hardware you upgraded to it's hard to say whether you should turn on DLSS or not.

The reality is that unless you are playing at 1080p, without an RTX 4080ti or better, the performance hit from turning PT on and DLSS off is probably not worth it. At 4K resolution, DLSS set to quality will be barely noticeable but at least your game will run much smoother.

Whether you turn on RR or not is a very personal preference. In my experience it produces a crisper image but comes with additional ghosting, which I abhor, so I leave it off but others don't mind the ghosting and prefer the crisper image. Try it and see which you prefer.
 
That's not entirely accurate.

Ray Reconstruction isn't a more advanced form of Path Tracing. PT is an advanced form of ray tracing. RR isn't ray tracing, it's denoising.

Ray Reconstruction's main aim is to remove the visual noise that Ray tracing naturally causes. Unless a patch changed that, RR cannot be turned on without DLSS as it is part of DLSS. RR is supposed to be a better denoiser than traditional methods of denoising (spatial and temporal) but people are divided on it since it has it's own set of side effects.

Path tracing will produce the best graphic fidelity. RR is meant to further improve it by providing better quality denoising but the actual light ray simulation comes from ray tracing/path tracing.

With that said, OP, without knowing what kind of hardware you upgraded to it's hard to say whether you should turn on DLSS or not.

The reality is that unless you are playing at 1080p, without an RTX 4080ti or better, the performance hit from turning PT on and DLSS off is probably not worth it. At 4K resolution, DLSS set to quality will be barely noticeable but at least your game will run much smoother.

Whether you turn on RR or not is a very personal preference. In my experience it produces a crisper image but comes with additional ghosting, which I abhor, so I leave it off but others don't mind the ghosting and prefer the crisper image. Try it and see which you prefer.
Indeed! Trying to get across in simple language that almost invariably the lighting will look better with RR than without (to my tastes anyway).
 
Top Bottom