I have to call you out on this again. Name one, two, three gaming journalists whose credentials you deem scarce. All in all, how many journalists were invited? What's the percentage of the alleged under-qualified?Kinl3y said:
Do you consider the person that posted the video you linked as a proper gaming journalist?AgentBlue said:
EDIT:
Upon further inspection that guy is just a shitty let's player, need I say more? Look at his average views, that guy will sure impact how Witcher 3 is viewed. Think of all the fans he will bring in!
The UI is from The Witcher 2 actually. And yes, please follow us on InstagramKinl3y said:So the CDPRED guys are on instagram now, and I don't know if this is new or not but:
Bottom row, third from the left, is that the time altering UI? Is it new or is it just me?
Also, horse mask.
I will take your word for it: there's one dubious media professional in a pool of I-don't-know-how-many-but-surely-plentiful journalists.Kinl3y said:
The point still holds: CDProjeckt thinks the demo is not for public consumption as of now. While the disadvantages are pretty obvious, how would CDProjekt' PR strategy benefit from releasing even a shorter version of the demo at this stage?
I do not doubt there were qualified people in there, I also do not doubt there were unqualified people in there. I merely expressed my dislike, not much point on going on about it, I admit.
And the point is valid. Although a written word every now and again, maybe accompanied by a picture or something, wouldn't hurt either, instead of giving all they have to press.
We fully agree.Kinl3y said:
Let's put the emphasis where it needs to be put then: encouraging CDPRjekt to start up a dev blog akin to Project Eternity's or Warhorse's.
Cheers.
He was invited at the E3 presentation and he must be a journalist or something.Kinl3y said:
Reason why fans are not still getting anything yummy is for non disclosure, not offering anything to competitors and it is normal administration for every media and every company. They apply the same policy on the books I work on and I cannot release my own illustrations until that book is out in the bookstores.
It is highly possible that they will release something after summer. But since no release date has been fixed yet, and many thing possibly are in the alpha version what do you expect to see? And half baked product? Say that you squee for a detail that it will be removed later, so why should they risk so much?
Have patience and that's all. You will get all the best of this game, no fear
Forget that Gothic 3 and 4 exists they are disgrace for Gothic series . Start with 2 with expansion, controlls are good but you need to practice. If you finish it go for first one IMO it has unmatched setting, lore and story for the first time controlls may be awkward but easy to goet used to. Then difference between European and american rpg will bi preatyy clear for you.sidspyker said:
If you are going to start from gothic 2 you will be really confused cuz you missed the plot of the first game,its like watching the second matrix movie before the first one...sidspyker said:
And gothic 3 is not that bad,yes its not gothic 1-2 and the combat is cr#p but give it a try later(and dont try arcania,really)
For gothic 1 no,for gothic 2 there is the Night of the raven addon(devs),its much harder than gothic 2,it adds new characters,a big new interesting location and story and lot of other staff,but its not recommended if you didnt play original gothic 1-2,the addon is really unforgiving.sidspyker said:
For gothic 3 if you want there is a community patch,its a must cuz the game is buggy as hell.
Also save really often and in different save slots in any of the gothic games,they are buggy and may crash and even corrupt your saves...from exp
If you like these games try risen games later too.
The question did cross my mind.Alextyc1 said:
If we are to vote, does that mean that's it? No more wallpapers? From now on it's just tracks, or does that mean, Ta Dah, the big disclosure is nearby?