Point me the things I'm dismissing. Just because not everyone wants to swallow every drop of overhype and actually analyze and point the things as how they are has nothing to do with dimiss stuff or not. You just refuse to accept this is how things are and keep acting blind.
Now that's just unnecessary. I fully expect there will be some disparity between the beautiful picture CDPR painted and what we get. I just don't expect it to be as bad as you claim it will be.
That's called personal opinion, not criticism. Criticism points out the things how they are, you can like them or not but that's how they are. It's the neutral ground without makeup.
My personal opinion has nothing to do with this, in fact it is because of my personal opinion I still like Cyberpunk and I didn't just ditched it.
No, that's literally what criticism is. A very personal opinion. It can be factual but it's not necessarily factual. It's perceived faults. But what you perceive and what everyone else perceives isn't necessarily the same. You're stating your opinion as factual and I'm fairly certain plenty here disagree with it, especially when it comes to post-launch support and how much the game has improved over the last 2 and half years.
Okey, so then your point is because The Witcher is amazing, then Cyberpunk has to be treated equally even if the quality is way worse?
My point is and I think I shouldn't need to explain this, Cyberpunk was released badly, the fixes so far have been poor because obviusly they want to move to the next project already. So I'm gonna treat, judge and expect Cyberpunk as Cyberpunk, not as another totally not related game that has nothing to do with Cyberpunk other than the same devs. There is plenty of dev teams that made master pieces and then they did atrocious works. We can pretend this is not a thing and play blind, but I rather to just see the things as how they are and when ever they actually put same care and work on Cyberpunk like they did with The Witcher then Cyberpunk will have the same trust and treatment as The Witcher has and deserves.
I mean if ppl play blind like that and pretend the things are not how they are, yeah it won't change anything. You know why I am not overhyped anymore about any release? Thanks to Cyberpunk and many other releases this past years, this is exactly why Overhype is not a problem for me anymore. I don't expect big things from PL aslong as the expansion has the same treatment like this last 3 years so far.
You dismiss this because all the two games have in common are the devs but... that's the single most important part. If you take the devs away then the two games clearly cannot be on the same level. It's not the same people behind them. Furthermore, based on what CDPR has said about PL this Sunday, this is literally them applying the same level of care and thought into CP2077 that they did in TW3.
All I'm saying is that I think you should give them a chance before crapping all over them.
My personal opinion, I really want them to step up and actually make Cyberpunk as good as The Witcher is now a days, until I see it words are just words.
The same applies to your own opinion. Until the product releases, it's just negativity for the sake of negativity
.... and yet another thread that totally derailed.
Can't we just have a single one were we actually stick to the subject of the thread, please? I just wanted to see the list of improvements, sheesh.


