Here's the excuse for every flaw of this game.If some people only knew what it takes to produce such a game as this.......
Fine, i get it, you can't talk bad of this game because it's one of the best of the last few years. Boom. End of discussion.
Here's the excuse for every flaw of this game.If some people only knew what it takes to produce such a game as this.......
Well... yes.So basically you're all saying "we're fine with lies because they made a great game."
But what happens when they will not make a great game like TW3? Only then you will start questioning CDPR's actions? Really?
I,personally, think that the Witcher 3 is a better game than the previous one, so for me things change for the better. I don't know what you mean when you say 'on this route'. Could you elaborate?If you want to let things like this go i think you're not making a good thing for both you and CDPR, simply because they'll continue on this route and in my exaggerated opinion it won't end well.
You gotta do it in the right forum. Believe me, we've ripped this game to bits.Here's the excuse for every flaw of this game.
Fine, i get it, you can't talk bad of this game because it's one of the best of the last few years. Boom. End of discussion.
Well... yes.
CDPR is a company that makes games.
They make a game I want to buy - I buy it.
They make a game I'm not interested in - I don't buy it.
Pretty simple, isn't it?
All the talk about lies, deception and whatnot is worthless. So is the drama around it. Why? Because in the end it's your money and it's up to you whether you want to spend your money on the game or not, and you should make that decision after the game's release.
---------- Post merged on 21-03-2016 at 12:19 AM ----------
I,personally, think that the Witcher 3 is a better game than the previous one, so for me things change for the better. I don't know what you mean when you say 'on this route'. Could you elaborate?
CDPR also isn't like most developers. They have access to a lucrative stream of income from GoG. It may not be equal to Valve's, but it still sets them apart from other companies. I am also fairly certain that they received financial subsidies from the Polish government to develop TW3. Regardless of whether that's true or not, I don't think Valve is an unfair comparison because they are both independent developers who publish their own games and have access to a digital distribution platform. And when I was discussing how and when developers make changes to their games, I believe that I also cited Irrational as another example of a company which continued cutting content late into the development cycle.@sevean
I don't think it's fair comparing Valve to the majority of other developers. Valve isn't like everyone else, they're the exception, not the rule.
Valve, thanks to Steam, literally have unlimited money. Steam rakes in billions for Valve. HL2 wasn't the only project they scrapped and restarted throughout their lifetime. They did something similar with Stars of Blood, where they cancelled it extremely late in development. Most other companies can't afford to do that, because they'd go bankrupt.
Asking questions - in a respectful and mature manner - is one thing, waxing lyrical over a version of TW3 that exists only on the cutting room floor is another. I don't like these kinds of threads because they usually devolve into the latter.Things were said, and then things changed and nobody communicated that to the fans. It's not unfair to ask questions and to want to know why.
I honestly don't see much of a difference. The link which you provided in your previous post led me to a screenshot of Velen which was slightly bleaker than what appeared in the final product. That's it. The texture quality of Geralt's armor also looks slightly better, but even then, I'm squinting to see the difference. Maybe I just have bad eyesight.If you prefer the current art style, I respect your opinion. Everyone has different aesthetical tastes.But to say that it doesn't look any different is simply untrue.
snip
Mind linking? Or if you can't, could you PM me?You gotta do it in the right forum. Believe me, we've ripped this game to bits.
Believe me I'm not happy at all with how their handled their PR and my image of CDPR has definitely been damaged but since the quality of the game (which to me is the most important thing) was still very high and this was their first time releasing an AAA multiplatform title intended for a global audience which require a different marketing strategy compared to how they have handled things in the past I don't think they have done enough just yet to deserve our total rage and hopefully they have learned their lesson. Time will tell.So basically you're all saying "we're fine with lies because they made a great game."
But what happens when they will not make a great game like TW3? Only then you will start questioning CDPR's actions? Really?
Other companies have done much worse too.Believe me I'm not happy at all with how their handled their PR and my image of CDPR has definitely been damaged but since the quality of the game (which to me is the most important thing) was still very high and this was their first time releasing an AAA multiplatform title intended for a global audience which require a different marketing strategy compared to how they have handled things in the past I don't think they have done enough just yet to deserve our total rage and hopefully they have learned their lesson. Time will tell.
Why do you all keep mentioning other companies? I'm not interested in what other companies do, we're talking about CDPR.Other companies have done much worse too.![]()
If what i'm doing is driven by total rage, well, you've not see anything. I've not joined this forum to defame and accuse CDPR of their actions. But when things like this happen, we should say ok? Fine? Continue like this because we don't really care? I'm not like that.I don't think they have done enough just yet to deserve our total rage and hopefully they have learned their lesson. Time will tell.
Because I'm trying to cool things down, before it gets locked, mate.Why do you all keep mentioning other companies? I'm not interested in what other companies do, we're talking about CDPR.
No, you're right, if you're unhappy about something, you're free to express that. With a few conditions: first of all, this is an 18+ forum, so you are expected to act like an adult when posting, as indicated by the rule about keeping discussions civil. That means emotional outbursts like the one you're having right now are not okay, as they're not conducive to civil discourse.If what i'm doing is driven by total rage, well, you've not see anything. I've not joined this forum to defame and accuse CDPR of their actions. But when things like this happen, we should say ok? Fine? Continue like this because we don't really care? I'm not like that.
Have i said that they have to burn at the stake? No but, because i care, i'm concerned.
I don't think it supposed to mean anything. It just a random text used while testing the UI.Other companies have done much worse too.
------------------
Google translate is having trouble identifying this language. It think it's Latin, but struggles to translate it. Any suggestions? Why do I get the feeling that this is just a random collection of words? I think I just wasted my time.
Ladies of the Wolf in Forest:
Curabitur sed lacinia quam. Nullam quis ultrices ipsum. Nulla euismod purus.
Grapeshot:
Go the the Lower Level / Vesemir / Elven Catacombs (same description):Ambiguentos ourem telomus pist et aloreipsem lumina cavernus em estimulatis biuguet nuelia amaris enermea unga
Phasellus quis justo in dui aliquam sollicitudin. Morbi sed risus suscipit velit blandit porttitor ut sed risus. Sed ac luctus lectus, sed pharetra neque. Proin tincidunt diam enim, non cursus massa mattis quis. Phasellus ultrices mauris vitae vehicula vestibulum.
Ut libero nulla, convallis non nisl sit amet, molestie sagittis ante. Integer vitae odio sagittis, aliquet felis sed, iaculis purus. Nulla ante nulla, fermentum et nulla vel, scelerisque vulputate elit. Nam et erat dignissim, convallis velit blandit, condimentum turpis. Mauris sit amet rutrum libero. In hac habitasse platea dictumst.
Class aptent taciti sociosqu ad litora torquent per conubia nostra, per inceptos himenaeos. Etiam quam libero, auctor nec lacinia dapibus, faucibus non lectus. Donec et justo ut odio vestibulum condimentum. Cras scelerisque varius nisl, et viverra nisl vestibulum ut.
Gryphon Steel school Sword:
Nulla mollis dignissim lectus, vel dapibus mi sollicitudin sed. Pellentesque fermentum purus a dapibus venenatis.
Cat potion:
Etiam et nisl non arcu tristique vestibulum. Donec tempus ante millis orci posuere accumsan. Suspendisse potenti. Mauris at arcu tristique, porta mi a, ullamcorper lectus. In eget varius lacus, at rutrum justo. Orci posuere accumsan. Suspendisse potenti. Mauris at arcu ristique, porta mi a ullamcorper lectus.
Cartsin eget varius lacus, at rutrum justo. Orci posuere accumsan. Suspendisse potenti. Mauris at arcu tristique vestibulum. Donec tempus ante mollis orci posuere accumsan. Suspendisse potenti.
Yeah, I agree with you. Only realised when I was already halfway, and you know... I didn't want to quit.I don't think it supposed to mean anything. It just a random text used while testing the UI.
A main character called the Inquisitor (Dragon Age reference?) was worked on. He would appear in No Man’s Land, and Geralt would have the choice to kill or spare him.
I don't believe that for a second, I have a lot of respect of you as a user and your creations and you and everyone else here should have every right to be concerned. (I am too). Just that it can be expressed in calmer way and they have probably heard these things plenty by now. (And hopefully they'll listen).I've not joined this forum to defame and accuse CDPR of their actions.
Cutting content does not give more screen time.The funny thing about it is that it seems to be the other way around, Triss got more screen time, as well as more important role in the story, as a result of the cuts.
At the time when Half-Life 2 was made, Steam was not such a major source of revenue yet, and of course it did not exist during the development of the first Half-Life. If anything, their development of single player games did not exactly improve since Steam became very popular.I don't think it's fair comparing Valve to the majority of other developers. Valve isn't like everyone else, they're the exception, not the rule.
Definitely agree with that first part.Cutting content does not give more screen time.At best compared to some other characters if those had more content deleted, but that hardly makes things better, and it is also difficult to judge the relative amounts of screen time removed by various cuts from the limited amount of information that is available in the leaked documents. I think the editing probably did not make a huge difference to the balance of content between the main characters. However, what matters the most is whether the deletions caused any issues that can be noticed without reading the leaked stuff, and that does seem to be the case here. Also, when it comes to importance in the story, deleting a character in one of the largest and most important quests (Ugly Baby - now I found it in "W3 ALPHA BUGS.xslx") and in the finale of the game (Battle Preparations and all the rest) is rather damaging in my opinion.
Yep, this is in the game.Are there better times ahead? For us, Aen Seidhe?
:crybaby:In general, there seem to be more elves and dwarves in the city in that earlier demo
Inquisitors was an original name for Witch Hunters, which was probably changed because of the Dragon Age: Inquisition. They were planned to be better prepared for the job as well, with dimeritum enhanced armors that would protect them from magic and dimeritium bombs blocking magical abilities.
No, but replacing and removing certain characters does. I will write about it later at some point, but I have to note that most of it was based more on an act of deduction, then anything specific I found in the files, but I'm still 90% sure that was the case.Cutting content does not give more screen time.