I don't know why moderators let this topic live, it's bad PR. One statement from the official should be enough to put an end to this. Imagine being new player / new to the community you come to the forums and there is all this misinformation. It's very discouraging, and it usually comes from the same people.
Last edited by a moderator:
You mean like statement that they won't be refunding reworked cards anymore (they did after that statement), or saying they don't work or have plans for mobile (they later said they worked and planned on it), or many other PR lies? This is what supposed to put an end to this? Really?
Come on, man, deleting this topic will bring more bad PR than letting it live. At least this way people [...] can act like we're wrong and throw shade, letting new players think we're some tinfoil hat crazies.
Last edited by a moderator:
Some posts edited, one deleted. You don't have to like the topic, or the people who post in it, or what is posted in it but you DO have to leave personal attacks, rude comments, and the like on the doorstep (i.e. not post them). If you don't it'll be you who gets in trouble.
Yep, and still waiting. I've asked CDPR directly, and get no response. I've attached a number of screenshots highlighting the problem, no response. I'd love them to categorically state there's no such thing.
Even if CDPR would post the source code of the matchmaking algorithm people would not believe them. There is nothing CDPR can do to stop this conspiracy theory.
As I said in my posts, anything that assumes something based on personal experiences is nothing more than a conspiracy theory.
For example, you will never share with us your winning streaks. You want to paint a picture, and as in conspiracy theories you leave out the bits that don't match your picture.
And you don't share all the rigged matchmaking results you have, leaving out bits that don't match your picture, but you don't see me complaining about it. You paint the picture you want, I paint the one I see, but somehow my vision is incorrect and yours true? Is that what you're saying?
IIRC, there was already a post from RED team saying that Matchmaking doesn't take into effect your decks, but it only considers your winning streak (which is fair and is the case in other games too). One of the Mods even posted that link from RED in this thread (or a similar thread). From the company's point of view, they can't keep making the same point again and again. They have said it once. That should be enough.
Also, I would request forum members to not state their assumptions as though it is a fact. At least please be kind enough to add "I think" or "It may be" or something like that. If a new member/player comes to this forum and see these kind of threads, they may assume that it is a well known fact by the entire community when it is NOT.
You couldn't be more wrong. But obviously you didn't even take the time to read my contributions in this thread, before saying that. So read, for example, this https://forums.cdprojektred.com/index.php?threads/matchmaking-still-rigged.10989730/page-9#post-11524549
then think about apologizing.
Last edited:
I never said that I lose more games than I win, because I win more games than I lose...so your 'fact' isn't a fact, because it's wrong. I don't know where people get their informations, but you can see that you should be the last person who talks about facts or conspiracy theories.
And the facts are, that I got constantly disadvantaged in the last weeks/months and I don't know why this happens, but it happens, so something is going wrong here, that's the only fact and I talked about nothing else.
That post doesn't make sense. If you win more than you lose, you are not disadvantaged. Then you're experiencing normality.
Yeah, they said that matchmaking doesn't care about your deck, but you can see that many people here have experienced the opposite of this. It happens all the time when I change my deck within the faction or the whole faction and they are telling that this not happens...so something is wrong here.
Post automatically merged:
Being disadvanteged has nothing to do with if the winrate is positive or negative. Your post doesn't make sense....
I used an Arachas deck and won three times. I then got put against Henselt with the mega-removal deck so couldn't even keep a drone on the board, plus had an atrocious deal, and lost. That deck then showed up every other time I played - it's almost inexplicable, except....
There clearly is matchmaking!
However looking at it objectively it probably HAS to be there, because if it wasn't and it was truly random then loads of net-deckers would simply march onto the ladder.
There clearly is matchmaking!
However looking at it objectively it probably HAS to be there, because if it wasn't and it was truly random then loads of net-deckers would simply march onto the ladder.
At higher ranks you sometimes queue up with the same person twice. The reason I believe is due to lack of players queuing at a particular time. This is the counter-argument for a rigged system. If the system was rigged then queue times would be much longer to find your ideal match. This is more aparent in casual, one day I managed to counter against same person atleast 5 times in a row, before I stoped playing, felt sorry for the guy who lost 5 consequtive times in a mirror match.
Would you mind sharing at what rank you’re plaing? Thanks.
Hey, new user here.
After being paranoid for a while that I was going first in matches far too often, and therefore at a disadvantage, I decided to record how often. It turns out I go first in matches over two-thirds of the time, data collected over the course of a week. But this isn’t the main issue that’s bugging me.
I’ve recently created a Nilfgaard No Unit deck (repulsive I know but I’m not looking to make friends and I figured if you can’t beat them join them). With this deck I get put against a certain type of Nilfgaard deck very often. It consists of Roach, Vivienne, Leo, Assire and other usual cards. I cannot beat this deck if I go first in the match. I always go first. 99 out of 100 times playing against this type of deck I go first.
So my question is, is match making fixed to prevent certain decks, such as no unit decks, from winning?
After being paranoid for a while that I was going first in matches far too often, and therefore at a disadvantage, I decided to record how often. It turns out I go first in matches over two-thirds of the time, data collected over the course of a week. But this isn’t the main issue that’s bugging me.
I’ve recently created a Nilfgaard No Unit deck (repulsive I know but I’m not looking to make friends and I figured if you can’t beat them join them). With this deck I get put against a certain type of Nilfgaard deck very often. It consists of Roach, Vivienne, Leo, Assire and other usual cards. I cannot beat this deck if I go first in the match. I always go first. 99 out of 100 times playing against this type of deck I go first.
So my question is, is match making fixed to prevent certain decks, such as no unit decks, from winning?