Actually, yes, it does make sense. Assume they're reading it.
They may not read every post, I don't know, but they definitely read enough to get a feel for what people want. And if they're considering doing something, they'll definitely want to read it.
Just don't expect them to respond in-thread. They don't do that often.
No it does not, as there is no way in heck that the two options (chance of them reading/taking notice of a well thought, out, uniform, clearly spelled out proposition in the OP versus them reading hundreds of pages of user posts, including a good chuck of OT, baseless wishes, contradictory posts, and so on) have the same likelyhood.
You for instance, are assuming as a condition that they'd decide to consider to do something, and
only then they would read everything (according to your insight in their m.o.?).
It's the usual trade-off between a well organised movement with a manifesto and specific requests versus thousands of different people (all agreeing in principle) voicing separately their personal grievances in a chaotic manner, as far as politics go.
But from the perspective of obtaining a specific result, and highlighting exactly what the problem is, so that it can be fixed to some degree, the two are not comparable.
It's a clear trade-off between personal preference vs sensible compromise vs likelyhood of obtaining a change.
I.e. with the current method, and assumptions, your (or anyone's) proposal would be just as likely from our POV to get picked by CDPR. The choice is given up, in totality, to CDPR's aleatory reading habits and preferences, from the get go.
Contributing to this thread does not directly lead to your specific preference, having a higher chance of being addressed, versus a common proposal everyone can contribute to. Unless we just turn this in a shouting match, which would be modded.
Like the one guy proposing a post-epilogue state set during act 2 versus something else completely different. Kinda pointless.
The reasonable course given your premises above, is for everyone to simply leave their proposal in post form, then move on.
Keeping the thread nice and tidy and not wasting time on the mess.
Oh, and another thing, not directly related to this specific issue. Without a common proposal everyone is aware about, all you get is both everyone proposing randomly different things unaware of what the others are proposing, and endless repetitions and arguments.
(this is direct at everyone not only
@Dragonbird obviously)
