can you clarify? I mean on how the rumour came to bevivaxardas said:That is part of the controversy./>
As I remember, the twitter reply was not terribly clear, can be interpreted either we did not see a final version of Novigrad, or did not see Novigrad at all. I would say it is Novigrad, but the work in progress.garrusbiggestfan said:
It has been confirmed it is Novigrad, just not in its final state.kitta said:
Officially.
As in a dev stepping in and saying it plain and simple here on the forum.
In my pinion what was shown was rather disappointing and I've given reasons why it would not be befitting.
Controversy happens when people disagree back and forth. I would have thought that after nearly 50 pages of people disagreeing back and forth that this would qualify as genuine controversy. And I think that if you're going to claim a problem that has been so extensively argued about doesn't really exist, then I would expect you to state your case.
Yes the twitter was ambiguous. But then a dev, MM360 if memory serves me well, posted an unequivocal response.vivaxardas said:
It's Novigrad, yet not in its final state.
Sure, but 50 pages of repeating the same things and mostly by the same users is diabolical persistence.AgentBlue said:
I don't think is what kitta meant, half of the community meant, part of the community wants.
I disagree.secondchildren said:
Not the same things have been said over and over, not even close, from both sides actually. Let's do this thread some justice. Besides, anyone is free to chime in at any time and take the thread in any on topic direction he sees fit.
I'd say that if it has lasted for, what, 50 pages now centred around divergent interpretations of the trailer then it's because at least some forum members shared a common interest in discussing their views on the matter. I can't see why anyone who might be not as keen on discussing these issues would be bothered by the discussion. Again, anyone is free to chime in, at any time, and take the thread in any direction he so chooses.
uhm maybe because it's nonsensefully repetitive?
how many times you have talked about the smirk on the face, the rape\not rape, the reason to hang a girl and so on?
how many times actually a girl can be hanged lol?
how many times you have talked about the smirk on the face, the rape\not rape, the reason to hang a girl and so on?
how many times actually a girl can be hanged lol?
So you're saying someone was actually discouraged from chiming in and contributing because I - specifically - kept repeating the same old same old? That's does put a smirk on my facesecondchildren said:
Also, may I suggest we continue this via PM?
I think she(he) means multiple people not just one personAgentBlue said:
You are not even reading what she is saying, you are just talking at her. If you say the same things over and over, it doesn't make them come true. The other sad thing is that you hide your poor arguments and logic behind "big words". For example, what does demanding positive evidence even have to do with the trailer? It does not matter for the scope of the trailer who was guilty or not...AgentBlue said:
Moderator: Edited for ad hominem attack on another member.
And to show up in the middle of the discussion and start insulting people is apparently your job. It does not look like to be a strange behavior to you, it seems. So sad.kitta said:
What is insulting is neglecting all the arguments which have been given and pretending that what one is saying is correct beyond doubt. Usually when people say "agree to disagree", they leave the argument alone because it has reached an impasse. In this case, however, we see a pattern, argue-> agree to disagree-> revive the argument. Why should the argument be revived if you have agreed to disagree? What are you trying to achieve beyond that point?
It is a blatant lie that the same issue is not being discussed over and over, from the start of this thread it has always been that the trailer is somehow bad, if not for one reason, then for another. What is the issue here? Do people have personal stock against this company that they feel the need to do this on their forum? I can understand having requests and wishes of the company, but that can be done in a more cordial and less-entitled manner.
I am sorry, but some people are pretending that they know how to do someone else's job better than them, and that is what I find insulting. My belief is that if people had not questioned this trailer in the first place, we would not be at this point, because that is also another pattern, see what other's dislike, however minor detail,-> blow it out of proportion to create controversy and doubt, for example, Novigrad.
Moderator: If you do not like the content or direction of a thread that other members are (maybe overenthusiastically) participating in, then it would be better not to spoil their fun by calling it a "farce" or demeaning other members. The moderators will suspend members who persist in such misconduct.
It is a blatant lie that the same issue is not being discussed over and over, from the start of this thread it has always been that the trailer is somehow bad, if not for one reason, then for another. What is the issue here? Do people have personal stock against this company that they feel the need to do this on their forum? I can understand having requests and wishes of the company, but that can be done in a more cordial and less-entitled manner.
I am sorry, but some people are pretending that they know how to do someone else's job better than them, and that is what I find insulting. My belief is that if people had not questioned this trailer in the first place, we would not be at this point, because that is also another pattern, see what other's dislike, however minor detail,-> blow it out of proportion to create controversy and doubt, for example, Novigrad.
Moderator: If you do not like the content or direction of a thread that other members are (maybe overenthusiastically) participating in, then it would be better not to spoil their fun by calling it a "farce" or demeaning other members. The moderators will suspend members who persist in such misconduct.
That's it guys! We're almost at 1000 posts! let's do it, we can do it! Just a few more. Let's make CDPJKT proud!
Doing my best here. I myself am trying to get to 2000 posts before September.Lahiri said:
Four more to go.
Three! I'd like to make a pretend contribution to the discussion, but unfortunately everything has been said, debated, refused, forgotten, and then said again...
998. I am pretty sure this number is the answer to the ultimate question of life, the universe, and everything.