Correction,GeraltofCyrodiil said:
1002.
There's a lot which hasn't been discussed, like,
Why is the girl wearing MAC make up?
I say let's make it to 2000.
1002.
There's a lot which hasn't been discussed, like,
Why is the girl wearing MAC make up?
I say let's make it to 2000.
Well, I've just re-viewing the trailer again and:
The only dilemma Geralt has is to follow the Vesemir's advice: Don't middle. Take the reward and let's go.
It's exactly the same scene of Rivia, when while the last part of their journey Geralt want to stop the cruelty he see and Jaskier say to him (the official edict of Pogrom is repalced by another dubious moral sentence): Don't do it, Geralt, let's go on. It's a scene book place it 5-6 yeras later but in the same scenario of after-war horror. And CDPR are just introducing Geralt and his way to be. Look for further explanation is only a free waste of time.
GREAT, CDPR's guys! Thank you very much. I love your devotion to the original books and love this little homage to them!
The only dilemma Geralt has is to follow the Vesemir's advice: Don't middle. Take the reward and let's go.
It's exactly the same scene of Rivia, when while the last part of their journey Geralt want to stop the cruelty he see and Jaskier say to him (the official edict of Pogrom is repalced by another dubious moral sentence): Don't do it, Geralt, let's go on. It's a scene book place it 5-6 yeras later but in the same scenario of after-war horror. And CDPR are just introducing Geralt and his way to be. Look for further explanation is only a free waste of time.
GREAT, CDPR's guys! Thank you very much. I love your devotion to the original books and love this little homage to them!
My friend, let me put my argument to your points. See the logic and tell me if you disagree. The soldiers accused the woman. Geralt does not know whether they were true or not. They were tormenting the woman to death. That is inhuman. You talked about international tribunals. Stoning a criminal to death is wrong. Death itself is the punishment. Death from torment is wrong, that is why a lot of the old execution methods are banned today. Geralt saw this as injustice and he acted. He aarded the soldier, but he knew they would attack him with the intent of killing him so he acted in self defense and killed them.vivaxardas said:
Now let's play this another way. Say that Geralt saw the woman kill innocent people. He would not have interfered just like he was not going to interfere with the soldiers when they were hanging her. It's not his job to stop her, he's a witcher. But if he saw her tormenting and stopping a wounded man just so she can eat him or loot him, Geralt would have punched her and sent her running, because he has the power to stop an unjust/immoral act and he is only human. If she would have come back with a knife/baton to attack him he would have most certainly killed her in self defense just the same way as the soldiers. Geralt is simple stopping the humans from doing something monstrous. He killed them to save himself, not the woman.
You see this as logical now?
Please think properly before you go to a war like situation and decide to kill a human with a weapon provisioned to you. False logic like yours could make an unjust decision on someone's life.
Ahh, actually, fo me it was never about killing the soldiers, it was about letting a cannibalistic marauder go. He killed some monsters, and let another out of his cage? This is just one of the perspectives.
Anyway, we spent a lot of time on this, and made it to 1000 posts. This debate looked at different perspectives we could take on this trailer. Just read what people posted. It is interesting, a lot of posts are well thought-out from both sides of this argument. It is not adversarial because we are not in a court of law. Just a discussion among friends.
Anyway, we spent a lot of time on this, and made it to 1000 posts. This debate looked at different perspectives we could take on this trailer. Just read what people posted. It is interesting, a lot of posts are well thought-out from both sides of this argument. It is not adversarial because we are not in a court of law. Just a discussion among friends.
...and 900 of those replies are me talking about Ciri. Probably.GeraltofCyrodiil said:
So lets live up to that estimate and ask a cirious question:
Do you guys think there will be a Ciri reveal trailer ?
CDPR is acting very secretive about her.
While Yennefer has been mentioned by CDPR staff in several interviews,
everyone keeps quiet about Ciri and her role or presence in TW3.
..well, one can hope there is a meaning behind that.
Yes, he let her go because he has not seen her perform a monstrous act. He has no right to judge unless he sees her do it?vivaxardas said:
Does this seem logical?
I'm having this feeling that Vesemir is going to die in The Witcher 3 story. Good and tough old witcher lived a lot already, and this would make things much more dramatic to the plot, and of course, one more badass reason for Geralt to do what he does best...kill.
o.0'Lahiri said:
No.
Hell, no.
Why would Vesemir die? He is old, experienced and deadly as every witcher. Why would Geralt kill him?
Nah, Vesemir is his mentor, he gave him name ( in a way ), like an crazy killing uncle that he never had ( and father ).
No, just no…
I really-really hope nobody will die in TW3 or at least we can help/save our friends. :/
I guess Lahiri didn’t mean that Geralt would kill him BUT he would revenge the death of Vesemir. If I understood correctly.ColIsengrim said:
Anyway, he is indeed very old and experienced Witcher and thus not so easy to kill him. Fortunately.
I never meant that Geralt will kill him, that would have no logic at all. Tasir is correct, what i meant is that Geralt will avenge his death.I think it would give a "never feel safe" vibe about the characters in the game, making things more interesting, just like G.R.R.Martin books (which are as good as Sapkowsky's, in my opinion).ColIsengrim said:
Dandy is marvelous in the books. He challenges Geralt, keeps him honest. He can go from comedic to sincere in a single paragraph. I wish CDPR would bring more of this into the games.KnightofPhoenix said:
I couldn't agree more. Dandelion's personality and relashionship with Geralt are away better in the books and not very much explored in the games.. Which is kinda odd since Dandelion is Geralt's best friend. I hope CDPK changes that with W3.slimgrin said:
I don't even want to think about who can die in TW3. We did not really have any deaths among significant Geralt's friends and supporters thus far (only Blue Stripes, but they were not major NPCs), so it is not exactly like GoT where nearly everyone eventually drops dead for some reason or other. At least I hope we'll have an option to save them if deaths of friends are a possibility.
Yes, Dandelion has much larger role in the books. He is not only about brothels and whores, he is actually much more significant as a character. Hopefully nobody will kill him, that would be not cool.
Yes, Dandelion has much larger role in the books. He is not only about brothels and whores, he is actually much more significant as a character. Hopefully nobody will kill him, that would be not cool.
Mocap sessions:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_detailpage&v=lOzW7tc9hio
http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_detailpage&v=lOzW7tc9hio