New perspective with EE?

[JackalJ]

New perspective with EE?

So I was thinking with all the new outro sequences that the EE will bring us, is it possible they change our perspective and opinions about the major player in the story?

Spoiler

As an example when king Radovid asks you to bring him Anais, but you convince Roche to bring her to Constable John Natalis. This will most certainly change the ending outro, so maybe when we see that outro (maybe even Adda???) we will reconsider giving Anais to Radovid the next playthrough? What I mean is that Radovid really was the good choice (or the bad) after you have seen the extra cinematics...?

your thoughts...?

 

[Blothulfur]

I'm wondering about this too, the conference is the REAL end of the game for me. All your playthroughs choices come to fruition here, with the fate of the northern kingdoms and their peoples decided by your actions. Philippa and Sile's unleashing of their tamed beast is an attempt to overturn that ending, a last desperate gamble. The outro may well reinforce that ending and the protagonists enormous contribution to the story told.

It will be interesting to see what comes of all those different permutations. Whether Temeria will rally to a young and untested Queen, whether Radovid Witchbane will spark the purgation of sorcerors that he desires, will Saskia still be bound by the lodges spells, and most interesting for me is the question of Aedirn. It stands at the forefront of a new invasion and has lost a rich province to invasion or revolt, what now for the embattled kingdom and the free Pontar state/Lormark.

It's a smart move in my opinion, i've just finished Fallout and the ending slides with their simple narration are amazingly effective.