oh yeah, i guess youre right, it looks f***ing amazing anyway, cant wait till february!Maybe what we saw was an older build of the game. Even then, it still looked really impressive.
my opinion isnt expert, its just my own. for instance, i dont find an animation of hair nice while geralt ducks and one more thing disturbs me, that hair is moving through faces, heads, or geralts armor
Jesus told me it's all gravy, He spoke with CDPR and they will remove the cheesy white lines from the crossbow fire no problem lol..It's not like it's coming out tomorrow, sweet baby Jesus calm the f down.
hair? guys, that was played on the xbox1! c'mon
Well, E3 almost never uses PC unless if the game is exclusive.Oh, was it now...?
I would actually love to see this confirmed, cause I don't think it's true.
8 1/2 and factor in manufacturing and shipping they really have 8.
I'll just leave this here. This was the state of The Witcher 2 11 months before release. Draw your own conclusions.
Who was complaining about hair animation?
I think I heard that hair physics will be removed for console versions. So the PC version should be much better there.
But I haven't seen anything bad with the hair.
Damn man now I'm really worried!!! Combat actually looks more natural than in W3(as it is right now), though graphics improved a hell of a lot.
combat in W3 right now looks way better, even if not fantastic