Decided to re-read The Hobbit once again. I've read it numerous times in the almost 20 years I've owned a copy, but it's just a classic that never loses its re-read value.
I re-read it last year. Always a pleasure. I prefer it in many respects to The Lord of the Rings -- at least in parts.Decided to re-read The Hobbit once again. I've read it numerous times in the almost 20 years I've owned a copy, but it's just a classic that never loses its re-read value.
Shame I can't lend you mine! It's been in the family for over 40 years, but, sadly, has begun to show its age a bit.I really want to re-read Lord of the Rings as well, but I don't own a copy.
This is the one I used to have:I really want to re-read Lord of the Rings as well, but I don't own a copy. I could, however, easily borrow one, the all-in-one version I've read in the past.
It takes days to read, whereas Hobbit seems to take me around 6,5 hours -- but I like long books when they're great stories.
A hardback with 1000++ pages weighs a lot, though, I remember that.
Oh boy, that sounds super exciting to read it by the fireside in winter (in a sofa, in a dressing gown, a cup of tea and with the slippers of course).am now perusing an old (1866) Etymological Glossary of The Shetland & Orkney Dialect.
Ach, it's an absolute page-turner! As for the rest, a wee dram of Scotch suits me better than tea (hardly ever touch the latter).Oh boy, that sounds super exciting to read it by the fireside in winter (in a sofa, in a dressing gown, a cup of tea and with the slippers of course).
Heh. Ay, it's not going to appear on anyone's 'best reads' list. It's merely another part of an ongoing dialect project for a bit of fantasy I'm writing.For me, it'sa kind of book probably used for a wobbly table