Isn't this what they said for assassins creed? They eventually had to put it out at 900p, because Xbox could not support 1080p... How is this different from this issue with TW3?
- Status
Not sure what you mean, what platform are you asking for? Assassin's Creed did 900p on both XB1 and PS4 because they "want to avoid debates." is what they said.
PC will support - whatever resolution you have provided you have the horsepower to run it.
PS4 is confirmed to be 1080p30 and XB1 is 900p30 right now but the Reds said they're trying to get it to 1080p.
PC will support - whatever resolution you have provided you have the horsepower to run it.
PS4 is confirmed to be 1080p30 and XB1 is 900p30 right now but the Reds said they're trying to get it to 1080p.
Thanks @MarcinMomot for clearing that up..it's all I wanted to know as well.
Good luck in finishing/optimizing the game until release date and I really hope that my GTX 980 will handle this game at ultra at over 30fps.
Good luck in finishing/optimizing the game until release date and I really hope that my GTX 980 will handle this game at ultra at over 30fps.
Ain't the recomended specs " a bit" too high for only 30 fps? ...
That statement is very vague, it never says what settings nor does it come from a tech person, it was an estimate by Mr.Badowski who handles the business side of things and he made an estimate, it's not really his job to know the innards of the game's tech. If you're very concerned about it then I would suggest waiting for actual reviews and benchmarks come release.
I can mention that the game has Ubersampling, which was confirmed so if they mean Ultra setting which will include ubersampling then 30 fps would be very very surprising. 2x2 Ubersampling is the same as playing with 4K res downsampling.
Last edited:
No, especially if we get the supreme eye candy we 've been promised.
Can please someone from Moderators Answer me.
From this new reviews, I cant find any mention about Nvidia PhysX, all journalists said, that PC version advantages its only Nvidia Hairworks and Ubersampling, no words about PhysX. So tell me please, Nvidia PhysX will be included in the final version of the game, or RED's cut it out too?
From this new reviews, I cant find any mention about Nvidia PhysX, all journalists said, that PC version advantages its only Nvidia Hairworks and Ubersampling, no words about PhysX. So tell me please, Nvidia PhysX will be included in the final version of the game, or RED's cut it out too?
No, it's just, kind of weird, so many reviews, and always the same text (about Hairworks and Ubersampling, and no mention about Physx\HBAO\TXAA).
Don't know if this has been mentioned, from this thread:
"During the presentation I played The Witcher 3 on Ultra and what I saw was indeed beautiful and fluid at the same time. For example – sunset…believe me – you won’t find a sunset as beautiful. Unfortunately, after some deep analysis by such a PC enthusiast as myself, the graphics do not make you fall to your knees anymore. "
Fall to my knees is right. The original graphics I saw looked ahead of its time, almost too good to be this gen. My concern was that the level of fidelity we saw in earlier footage would be locked away entirely, possibly enabled through ini editing or code-diving, or maybe outright impossible to access? I don't know why they'd not just let us turn everything up as far as we wish and let the frame-rate suffer accordingly?
Then again, a promise is a promise, but it still presents the question of why they took things down a notch in the first place.
"During the presentation I played The Witcher 3 on Ultra and what I saw was indeed beautiful and fluid at the same time. For example – sunset…believe me – you won’t find a sunset as beautiful. Unfortunately, after some deep analysis by such a PC enthusiast as myself, the graphics do not make you fall to your knees anymore. "
Fall to my knees is right. The original graphics I saw looked ahead of its time, almost too good to be this gen. My concern was that the level of fidelity we saw in earlier footage would be locked away entirely, possibly enabled through ini editing or code-diving, or maybe outright impossible to access? I don't know why they'd not just let us turn everything up as far as we wish and let the frame-rate suffer accordingly?
Then again, a promise is a promise, but it still presents the question of why they took things down a notch in the first place.
Yeah it's because the Ultra settings are still being worked on and not everything is implemented so nobody got to see the game on Ultra, only on High settings.
So the preview I quoted "During the presentation I played The Witcher 3 on Ultra" is mistaken?
Then you should also read in that very same thread, the person who wrote the preview mentioned that he thought it was Ultra but actually that wasn't the case.
I'll quote the parts:
Yes it's mentioned in that thread itself.
I'll quote the parts:
Do we know if the 15 minutes of the gameplay released was high or ultra? I remember a Polish article stating that the stuff that was released to us looks better than what they played at the press event. So it's either ultra on the stuff we saw, or just general improvements over the build of the game used to capture the footage.
Well, I don't wanna say that it is a "obligation" for CD Projekt RED to put out some sort of video demonstrating the PC version and PC controls, but if even in Bioware they have taken time to show of the PC version of DAI, I would expect to do the same CD Projekt RED.. even if it would be some two/one weeks before the release of the game
Can i just say, thank you for replying to us! This thread has really become a mess of hostility and anger. Understandably because of the poor practices of bigger companies like EA and Ubisoft.1. Yes
2. Yes
3. Not sure but that's a good idea and something we will definitely look into
Still, i have a great deal of respect, and trust in CD Projekt. I believe that you guys delayed the game twice in order to meet expectations and fully deliver, and i wish you guys all the best at reaching your goals! I look foward to playing the game when its ready, and i'm sorry if you guys are getting any misguided hate from people!
@misho8723 For what it's worth:
Not sure but that's a good idea and something we will definitely look into
Yeah, I know about that.. but it reads like : "Well, if we don't forget about it then maybe yes"..
Maybe to you, what it means to me is "We have a lot of things already planned. It is a good idea, but we may not be able to fit it in. We will if we can though." Still, if you want to be negative, I guess we can't stop you.
- Status