The art will always be lackluster without some of the magic Anna P used to bring.She's been doing some art for magic the gathering lately. Knickers is one of hers but it's from Thronebreaker which isn't a new card.I'm quite disappointed with that as well and with the general art direction of this expansion.
Apparently it was not enough to have a whole expansion consisting mostly of ugly dwarves, monsters and dudes clad in armor, the only dryad had to be covered up ... I guess the next step is robots and furries.
I had decided to base my purchase of premiums on the quality of the art. Censorship is enough for me to make up my mind about it.
...you know we are in the universe of the games not in the books, right? (not Netflix)... you know that dryads from the books were not naked, right? (nor green...)
What was confirmed as a bug?It was confirmed by Burza to be a bug.
I agree, just give us the silly boobs we want and be done with it.This thread is weird. So much uproar because of some boobs
This is the main reason i chymed in this thread, I mean tits are fine, sure, why not, but if you want to cover them up on dryads then use some flora for it, be it flowers, leaves, roots, tendrils ect. I mean this isnt the first nudity censor they made, and I never cared about it because it was well made on previous cards. Those peasant clothes are just ugly man.It's more of the "how" is made. The girl wears gym clothes ... in a medieval game ... to live in the woods. You need to see the NIke label and it is complete.
Those things that you mention are flora, fauna are animals, something like she had squirrels hanging from their breasts, it wouldn't be so bad, the animation would be a memecover them up on dryads then use some fauna for it, be it flowers, leaves, roots, tendrils ect.