It is real and also "Ultra", you just have to tune things down.Someone linked me this:
http://www.pcgameshardware.de/The-Witcher-3-PC-237266/Specials/Grafikkarten-Benchmarks-1159196/
IS this real? Because if it is I may as well cancel my pre-order, there is no way my GTX 760 can handle it.
I'm able to see everything indeed, I have a fine eye for details, in life, not just on a screen. And I can tell you that my experience from the last many many years is that the majority of gamers have a fervid imagination when it comes to find differences where are none or are given from an image which isn't perfectly the same.Heh. Maybe it comes with expirience. I see a big difference apart the yellow tint. But this is how the world works. Some peope hera better audio some don't or cant distinguish. Just life. Not criticising you - there is difference you just might not be able to see it. And it's ok. I can see it and this is what matters to me.
I think so too. Just unlock everything and let people choose. That is the point of pc gaming.They made the game better looking and more demanding, that's what people wanted. Now you need a high end PC if you want to max it out.Or just turn down the settings until you get the framerates of the preview version.
Rly? 80fps on 980 before patch and drivers (according to Kinley and his source) vs. 50fps on 980 after new patch and driver + "better looking" filter? Seriously?They made the game better looking and more demanding
It is a german site so it makes sense that its in german.i don't understand this benchmark. And only deutch bench ? seriously ? only deutch speak this language.
I wish nothing more that you are right. I wait for this Game since first Word. Witcher is one of my all time favorites. It saddens me that this whole Grafics Stuff is Topic. Hell i thought my first Post here would be to thank CDRP for their work. In my Eyes the Dev´s who work on the Game are Artists, almost Genius. To bad the Promotion Staff of CDRP arent that skilled.I think in motion it will look awesome.
The additional LOD and draw distance + light change - is about 20% of perfomance. I'm happy with that.
Fine! It's subjective. The lod etc is there - they changed it, confirmed it... and I can easily tell you that there is a lot more detail visible in the far. You can missinterpret "a lot more" - ofc it is a detail - but a important one. As you probably know the devil is in the details - always.I'm able to see everything indeed, I have a fine eye for details, in life, not just on a screen. And I can tell you that my experience from the last many many years is that the majority of gamers have a fervid imagination when it comes to find differences where are none or are given from an image which isn't perfectly the same.
Anyway no one is going to win, for me you have a fervid imagination, for you I'm not able to spot details. That's life, too![]()
The PCGH benchmark shows both HBAO+ off (aus) and on (an). There is very little difference in performance between SSAO and HBAO+. There are also benchmarks for Hairworks.Imagine that this is also with no HBAO+ and Hairworks, put that one and u get even lower fps xD![]()