Forums
Games
Cyberpunk 2077 Thronebreaker: The Witcher Tales GWENT®: The Witcher Card Game The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt The Witcher 2: Assassins of Kings The Witcher The Witcher Adventure Game
Jobs Store Support Log in Register
Forums - CD PROJEKT RED
Menu
Forums - CD PROJEKT RED
  • Hot Topics
  • NEWS
  • GENERAL
    SUGGESTIONS
  • STORY
    MAIN JOBS SIDE JOBS GIGS
  • GAMEPLAY
  • TECHNICAL
    PC XBOX PLAYSTATION
  • COMMUNITY
    FAN ART (THE WITCHER UNIVERSE) FAN ART (CYBERPUNK UNIVERSE) OTHER GAMES
  • RED Tracker
    The Witcher Series Cyberpunk GWENT
FAN ART (THE WITCHER UNIVERSE)
FAN ART (CYBERPUNK UNIVERSE)
OTHER GAMES
Menu

Register

Platform Discussion Thread

+

Which API do you think CP 2077 will use?

  • DirectX 11

    Votes: 26 22.2%
  • DirectX 12

    Votes: 66 56.4%
  • Vulkan

    Votes: 21 17.9%
  • OpenGL

    Votes: 4 3.4%

  • Total voters
    117
Prev
  • 1
  • …

    Go to page

  • 15
  • 16
  • 17
  • 18
  • 19
  • …

    Go to page

  • 68
Next
First Prev 17 of 68

Go to page

Next Last
Gilrond-i-Virdan

Gilrond-i-Virdan

Forum veteran
#321
Jun 30, 2018
xer21 said:
you act like none of this costs money.

its the same logic of "why won't x dev port y game to z platform"?

can they do it? yes. is it worth their TIME? well, they're the ones with the market research doing the work.
Click to expand...
Which is exactly the point. If small studios can afford it, I don't buy the argument that the likes of EA can't.
 
xer21

xer21

Forum veteran
#322
Jun 30, 2018
Gilrond-i-Virdan said:
Which is exactly the point. If small studios can afford it, I don't buy the argument that the likes of EA can't.
Click to expand...
small studios have far lower overhead and smaller games. EA is in the business of making money, not spending it.
 
  • RED Point
Reactions: BaalNergal and Heart Of Dawn
Heart Of Dawn

Heart Of Dawn

Forum regular
#323
Jun 30, 2018
Tools might not be an issue, but Quality Assurance is. it's massive part of development in terms of both time and cost. For a triple-A game is this could be hundreds, if not thousands, of man-hours just playing small slices of the game over and over, trying different things to see what breaks.

Doubling your workload for a whole other OS when the return on the investment is so small just doesn't make good financial sense.
 
  • RED Point
Reactions: BaalNergal
BaalNergal

BaalNergal

Rookie
#324
Jun 30, 2018
Gilrond-i-Virdan said:
I don't think it is an issue. There are Linux gaming developers who can address all that, they aren't lacking, and tools / educational resources are improving as well. Today it's simply a question of interst and will to address Linux gaming market.

Also, this argument falls apart when you consider that smaller studios are more commonly releasing for Linux than juggernauts funded by legacy publishers. Surely smaller studios have less resources to allocate to learning unfamiliar things, yet here we are.
Click to expand...
How many of those Linux developers are for AAA games?

The others dealt with the juggernaut part.
 
  • RED Point
Reactions: xer21
Sardukhar

Sardukhar

Moderator
#325
Jun 30, 2018
I feel we've seen this argument a bunch. A bunch a bunch.

Not even sure how relevant it is - Cyberpunk is not announced or even hinted at by CDPR for Linux.

May merge this with Hardware thread.
 
Snowflakez

Snowflakez

Forum veteran
#326
Jun 30, 2018
Sardukhar said:
I feel we've seen this argument a bunch. A bunch a bunch.

Not even sure how relevant it is - Cyberpunk is not announced or even hinted at by CDPR for Linux.

May merge this with Hardware thread.
Click to expand...
Noooo! I think it merits its own thread. We are having a fun, non-toxic discussion about Linux and Cyberpunk 2077. Compared to the other discussions, I'd say this is one of the better ones. Plus, your epic showdown with Gilrond must be preserved in its own thread.
 
Last edited: Jun 30, 2018
  • RED Point
Reactions: EngryEngineer, BlindManMark, Gilrond-i-Virdan and 1 other person
Gilrond-i-Virdan

Gilrond-i-Virdan

Forum veteran
#327
Jul 1, 2018
Sardukhar said:
Cyberpunk is not announced or even hinted at by CDPR for Linux
Click to expand...
Which is only more so the reason to remind CDPR about the demand for it. Someone is ought to reverse their Linux hostile shareholders decision that killed TW3 for Linux project, at least in the context of their future efforts.
 
Gilrond-i-Virdan

Gilrond-i-Virdan

Forum veteran
#328
Jul 1, 2018
BaalNergal said:
How many of those Linux developers are for AAA games?
Click to expand...
Anyone who is an expert in computer graphics. CDPR themselves had several people who were experts in cross platform APIs including Vulkan (for instance Tomasz Jonarski). Finding experts isn't a problem for a company like CDPR.
 
BaalNergal

BaalNergal

Rookie
#329
Jul 1, 2018
Gilrond-i-Virdan said:
Anyone who is an expert in computer graphics. CDPR themselves had several people who were experts in cross platform APIs including Vulkan (for instance Tomasz Jonarski). Finding experts isn't a problem for a company like CDPR.
Click to expand...
You do know that Vulkan has SDKs for Windows, right? You don't need Linux expertise to use Vulkan.
 
  • RED Point
Reactions: xer21
xer21

xer21

Forum veteran
#330
Jul 1, 2018
Gilrond-i-Virdan said:
Which is only more so the reason to remind CDPR about the demand for it. Someone is ought to reverse their Linux hostile shareholders decision that killed TW3 for Linux project, at least in the context of their future efforts.
Click to expand...
they dont have shareholders, they're a private company.

Pretty sure they just couldnt justify the demand vs the work. Esepcially since man of the linux users already owned it somewhere else.
 
  • RED Point
Reactions: BaalNergal
Snowflakez

Snowflakez

Forum veteran
#331
Jul 1, 2018
xer21 said:
they dont have shareholders, they're a private company.

Pretty sure they just couldnt justify the demand vs the work. Esepcially since man of the linux users already owned it somewhere else.
Click to expand...
Eh? They are a public company in Poland.
 
Gilrond-i-Virdan

Gilrond-i-Virdan

Forum veteran
#332
Jul 1, 2018
BaalNergal said:
You do know that Vulkan has SDKs for Windows, right? You don't need Linux expertise to use Vulkan.
Click to expand...
Not sure if that's relevant to the above discussion. Of course Vulkan has SDK for Windows, it's a cross platform API, unlike Direct3D. Above I was answering to the claim of supposed scarcity of Linux programming experts.
 
Gilrond-i-Virdan

Gilrond-i-Virdan

Forum veteran
#333
Jul 1, 2018
xer21 said:
they dont have shareholders, they're a private company.
Click to expand...
They surely are a public company. See: https://www.cdprojekt.com/en/investors/shareholders/
 
  • RED Point
Reactions: BaalNergal
xer21

xer21

Forum veteran
#334
Jul 1, 2018
Snowflakez said:
Eh? They are a public company in Poland.
Click to expand...
my mistake, didnt know they went public in poland.,

doesnt change it, no one kills a linux port just because they hate linux, im sure they looked at the financials and killed it. there
's too many votes held by the people within the company for it to be an outside decision to kill linux.
 
  • RED Point
Reactions: BaalNergal
Gilrond-i-Virdan

Gilrond-i-Virdan

Forum veteran
#335
Jul 1, 2018
xer21 said:
doesnt change it, no one kills a linux port just because they hate linux
Click to expand...
Can easily happen, especially when shareholders are clueless on the topic. Common mentality is dealing with platform controlled by vendors, so dealing with Linux is unfamiliar to many.

We don't really know what happened though, those decisions weren't public and CDPR doesn't communicate them.
 
BaalNergal

BaalNergal

Rookie
#336
Jul 1, 2018
Gilrond-i-Virdan said:
Not sure if that's relevant to the above discussion. Of course Vulkan has SDK for Windows, it's a cross platform API, unlike Direct3D. Above I was answering to the claim of supposed scarcity of Linux programming experts.
Click to expand...
It's relevant in that it eliminates one of the bigger arguments in favor of Linux-experienced developers being generally common. It also shows that one can be generally a graphics expert without Linux experience, using the one graphics program you brought up.

Beyond that, all that is left is what CDPR did years ago as an argument for them doing it now, and even companies as friendly as they are can have a high turnover of unneeded staff. It is entirely possible they have no one left with Linux experience.

It is entirely possible they don't have enough demand to justify hiring new people just for an OS conversion when they don't really need those people for any other aspect of the game development. People with those kinds of skills tend to be expensive, after all.
 
Gilrond-i-Virdan

Gilrond-i-Virdan

Forum veteran
#337
Jul 1, 2018
BaalNergal said:
It's relevant in that it eliminates one of the bigger arguments in favor of Linux-experienced developers being generally common.
Click to expand...
They are available, if anyone needs to find some. CDPR never even posted a position for Linux graphics development, so it's not like they had hard time finding any. That's not an issue that was some blocker.

In case of TW2 they contracted Virtual Programming instead of doing the work in house.
 
xer21

xer21

Forum veteran
#338
Jul 1, 2018
Gilrond-i-Virdan said:
Can easily happen, especially when shareholders are clueless on the topic. Common mentality is dealing with platform controlled by vendors, so dealing with Linux is unfamiliar to many.

We don't really know what happened though, those decisions weren't public and CDPR doesn't communicate them.
Click to expand...
based on the shareholder data, CD Projket people themselves hold about 35% of the shares, so you'd need a HUG consensus from the public to nix it. Pretty sure CD Projekt had a say in nixing it themselves.
 
Gilrond-i-Virdan

Gilrond-i-Virdan

Forum veteran
#339
Jul 1, 2018
xer21 said:
based on the shareholder data, CD Projket people themselves hold about 35% of the shares, so you'd need a HUG consensus from the public to nix it. Pretty sure CD Projekt had a say in nixing it themselves.
Click to expand...
A while ago they had a majority, but lately they sold more shares to the public. That's why I said it could be Linux hostile shareholders influence.
 
Sardukhar

Sardukhar

Moderator
#340
Jul 1, 2018
CDPR is a public company, but control is held by four people, with more than 30% of the stocks.

General shareholders do not control the company. Iwinski, the two Kiciniskis and Nielubowicz control the company. Not only do they control by far the largest voting block of shares, their performance guarantees cooperation from everyone else.

They will not be talked into Linux gaming by our forums. They weren't for Witcher 3 and if they do for CP2077, it won't be anything we say. It's their ( very successful billion-dollar) business to know whether Linux is a good idea or not.

It is raw arrogance to suggest that we here know better than CDPR what is good for their business.

"In 2010, in the first Humble Bundle sales, Linux accounted for 18%.[42] The Steam client tracks usage and reported in March 2014 that less than 1.2% of users are using some form of Linux as their platforms primary operating system,[43] in May 2015 it was below 1%.[44] The Unity game engine gathers user statistics and showed in that March 2016 Linux users accounted for 0.4% of players.[45] "

From wikipedia.

CDPR just doesn't see the demand. They do fine on PS, Xbox and Windows. Linux isn't a serious market and Linux users can run things like Wine anyway.

CDPR stock has gone up by 1000% since before Witcher 3 launched. The bosses know what they are doing. Linux is not a priority, obviously.

We had this conversation around Witcher 3. The same facts apply to Cyberpunk 2077.

The reason I get tired of this circle is because it is the -same- circle. Nothing has changed. Furthermore, it's now akin to asking for, say, an Android version. It's not on the menu, it's not even been suggested as being on the menu and so, it has nothing to do with Cyberpunk 2077.

If CDPR announces something Linux related, fine. Until then, using the forums to promote your particular pipedream isn't what they are here for. Unless that pipedream is -directly- cyberpunk related.
 
  • RED Point
Reactions: BlindManMark and xer21
Prev
  • 1
  • …

    Go to page

  • 15
  • 16
  • 17
  • 18
  • 19
  • …

    Go to page

  • 68
Next
First Prev 17 of 68

Go to page

Next Last
Share:
Facebook Twitter Reddit Pinterest Tumblr WhatsApp Email Link
  • English
    English Polski (Polish) Deutsch (German) Русский (Russian) Français (French) Português brasileiro (Brazilian Portuguese) Italiano (Italian) 日本語 (Japanese) Español (Spanish)

STAY CONNECTED

Facebook Twitter YouTube
CDProjekt RED
  • Contact administration
  • User agreement
  • Privacy policy
  • Cookie policy
  • Press Center
© 2018 CD PROJEKT S.A. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED

CD PROJEKT®, Cyberpunk®, Cyberpunk 2077® are registered trademarks of CD PROJEKT S.A. © 2018 CD PROJEKT S.A. All rights reserved. All other copyrights and trademarks are the property of their respective owners.

Forum software by XenForo® © 2010-2020 XenForo Ltd.