Poll: Should CD Projekt make a Witcher 3?

[username_3522236]

Poll: Should CD Projekt make a Witcher 3?

Title says it all, though if you hit no, I'll forgive you because you're obviously tired and sincerely meant to hit "yes".

 

[original182]

Keep in mind that this is a public poll and people can see it if you voted no.

And, why would they not make witcher 3? It's obvious the story must continue, and it is a money maker.

 

[sahara]

I say yes and as soon as possible i just can not wait

 

[227]

This is like asking a group of alcoholics if vodka is awesome.

 

[dragonbird]

LOL. They've already said they're making one. Obviously everyone in these forums will want them to, and it will take as long as it takes, presumably several years.

Welcome to the forums, acewings!

 

[Anwell]

I would be very suprised if anyone woted no on this

 

[dementedsheep]

Well yeah. They need at least one more game to wrap things up anyway.

 

[sahara]

This is like asking a group of alcoholics if vodka is awesome.

This is why i like this site every one is nice and some times you see something that just makes your day ( this goes to every one here) thank you 4 this one

 

[mrowakus]

This is like asking a group of alcoholics if vodka is awesome.

Some prefer cheap wine, though. Let them have Derp Age 3 then.

 

[fchopin]

I voted yes but only with the condition that we are able to play as Yennefer for some of the time like we could do with some NPC’s in TW2.

 

[username_3522236]

Admins, sticky this shiznit please!

 

[edk]

I like cliffhanger endings, so I voted yes.
And I think that TW1 had e perfect ending that was good for both a sequel and the game ending then.
It's just that...if TW3 is as big step down as TW2...
I'm sure that many people don't agree with me, but I liked the original game too much
It's too late to stop now, and I'd like to see CDP interpretation of Yennefer. Not to mention the great concept art

 

[secondchildren]

Admins, sticky this shiznit please!

No need. We already had a similar poll.

 

[Sandis]

No doubts about that!, piece of cake answer!...FOR THE SAKE OF ALL TW FANS, PLEASE MAKE THIRD MASTERPIECE!...

 

[dragonbird]

No need. We already had a similar poll.

And an answer

 

[Aditya]

this thread is totally meaningless why would anyone even say no?

 

[username_3522236]

this thread is totally meaningless why would anyone even say no?

People would select no to troll...

It's not meaningless, it lets the devs know that we want the Witcher 3, and we want it now!

 

[phamvan94]

Oh look! Another one of these threads!
Seriously, look at the reception TW2 got. Do you really except them not to make TW3 ?

 

[nmargot]

Absolutely yes! TW1 and TW2 lead irrevocably toward TW3 and beyond.

Can't wait, personally.

 

[MMAMickey]

Absolutely, although personally I'd like the third instalment to be a compromise between the first and second titles. For example:

• Keep TW2 combat mechanics
• Able to drink potions at any time
• Able to take part in drinking games
• Need to use alcohol to make potions
• Able to make 'Boss'-mutagens with specific Boss-related effects
• Have a wide selection of armour and weapons
• Have fast non-cutscene kill animations, with no quicktime events beyond perhaps the LMB 'click to fill' bars.
• More 'Witcher's work', so we remember that Geralt is primarily a monster hunter, not a political hero.
• A compromised system of ingredient collection, where obvious ingredients can be collected without research (ie. Nekker hearts) but less obvious ingredients need knowledge to collect and use. For ingredients available in the previous two titles however, Geralt should either know them as standard, or have knowledge on the ingredients he had used/ had knowledge of from TW1&2 saves.

But then again, that's just my opinion