Radovid in Loc Muinne
I love the game's story and political intrigue a lot and think it's very well done and most of the points are linked together. But there are some events / acts that seem at first glance to be a bit problematic.
For instance. Radovid knew that Philippa was behind the assassinations before the conference and Geralt tells him about Sile's involvement if on Roche's path, after which he promises that he will punish her severely.
Yet why does he only react fully against the Lodge / Sile and the Council until during the conference? He potentially already knew that Sile was behind it, as were Philippa's associates. I can perhaps understand him not doing anything against the Council, because he had no proof that mages were involved as a whole. But Sile was right there and he must have known that all this was part of Philippa's plan.
It could be that the writers sort of didn't think about it. But I prefer to speculate otherwise.
- Radovid seemingly likes the appearance of being lawful. We see this when he says that the mages will be trialed and a court of law will decide who is traitorous (which apparently didn't happen. I think Radovid lost control of the situation and did not order a pogrom). And his ambition to annex Temeria is through lawful means. So it is possible that he did not want to act with an iron fist until Sile and / or the mages were publicly exposed.
- And / or, his dealing with Shilard go further than one would think. It is very possible that Radovid knew that Shilard was going to bring Letho to the conference and then when he exposes the mages, Radovid would act. Radovid does say that Nilfgaard owes him a favor. I speculated that he helped them deal with their mage problem, but this could be it as well. Radovid always wanted to deal with mages, this much is clear from TW1 and from his absorption of the Order of the Flaming Rose (created by Redanian intelligence to combat mages in the first place). Perhaps he saw the opportunity and planned with Shilard to eliminate them.
But if Shilard doesn't show up and only Triss does, he can deal with Sile but not with the Council as a whole as they were absolved of the crime. Radovid would look bad if he was overzealous.
What do you guys think?
Maybe the new added content / cutscenes can shed more light into this. The Loc Muinne conference is fascinating for all the politicking, backroom dealings, mysteries and backstabbing that occur.
EDIT: This could also bring a new meaning to Shilard's line in the Witcher's World about Radovid: "We can only hope that his errors do not prove to be grave ones."
I love the game's story and political intrigue a lot and think it's very well done and most of the points are linked together. But there are some events / acts that seem at first glance to be a bit problematic.
For instance. Radovid knew that Philippa was behind the assassinations before the conference and Geralt tells him about Sile's involvement if on Roche's path, after which he promises that he will punish her severely.
Yet why does he only react fully against the Lodge / Sile and the Council until during the conference? He potentially already knew that Sile was behind it, as were Philippa's associates. I can perhaps understand him not doing anything against the Council, because he had no proof that mages were involved as a whole. But Sile was right there and he must have known that all this was part of Philippa's plan.
It could be that the writers sort of didn't think about it. But I prefer to speculate otherwise.
- Radovid seemingly likes the appearance of being lawful. We see this when he says that the mages will be trialed and a court of law will decide who is traitorous (which apparently didn't happen. I think Radovid lost control of the situation and did not order a pogrom). And his ambition to annex Temeria is through lawful means. So it is possible that he did not want to act with an iron fist until Sile and / or the mages were publicly exposed.
- And / or, his dealing with Shilard go further than one would think. It is very possible that Radovid knew that Shilard was going to bring Letho to the conference and then when he exposes the mages, Radovid would act. Radovid does say that Nilfgaard owes him a favor. I speculated that he helped them deal with their mage problem, but this could be it as well. Radovid always wanted to deal with mages, this much is clear from TW1 and from his absorption of the Order of the Flaming Rose (created by Redanian intelligence to combat mages in the first place). Perhaps he saw the opportunity and planned with Shilard to eliminate them.
But if Shilard doesn't show up and only Triss does, he can deal with Sile but not with the Council as a whole as they were absolved of the crime. Radovid would look bad if he was overzealous.
What do you guys think?
Maybe the new added content / cutscenes can shed more light into this. The Loc Muinne conference is fascinating for all the politicking, backroom dealings, mysteries and backstabbing that occur.
EDIT: This could also bring a new meaning to Shilard's line in the Witcher's World about Radovid: "We can only hope that his errors do not prove to be grave ones."


