The last word was over a year ago, and the first was two years ago. Things change in game development, and priorities shift. If you're going to tell me your opinion of TW3 or CDPR is marred because of something they said they wanted to do a year ago then you have your priorities screwed up.
They should, because a mod kit is not mandatory for a game. We paid them $60, they gave us a phenomenal game. If they said they wanted to make modding tools and then back out of it of course it sucks and we all wanted them but deal with it.
You're a really bad apologist.
The last word was weeks before the release of the game, I find it funny how you use "1 year ago" to make it seem more distant than it was.
Would be a different story if the last time they mentioned REDkit was one year before the game's release, in that way everyone could have assumed it wasn't happening.
No they shouldn't get a pass, consumer trust relies on the good faith and reliability of the developer's words. That's been thrown out the window in two ways with Witcher 3, with the mod support and the technical/visual downgrade of the game. If we had gotten a REDkit as promised, it would have made up for the PC downgrade, since we could have pretty much made our own Enhanced Edition.
"a mod kit is not mandatory for a game"
Either you don't understand the arguments being given here, or you're purposefully making a straw man.
"We paid them $60, they gave us a phenomenal game."
Now you're just making a red herring, that's completely irrelevant to the discussion at hand, and it's exactly what I predicted.
"deal with it"
Fantastic rebuke, you really showed me there. This is me dealing with it, clearly you didn't want it that much if at all.
As to your reply to the other person, it's perfectly possible to lose respect for someone due to X or Y reason, yet still have respect and appreciation for their work.