So by "final" you are saying that if there are more bugs after the patch then those will never be fixed?
Dunno if this has been answered, but will all the content be on one disk or will it just be a fully patched base game and 2 DLC exp pack codes?
I was already a bit leery of Cyberpunk. If it's Blood and Wine quality I'll pass. Definitely going to wait for reviews.
Games always have bugs. There will be remaining bugs. Especially in a game of this size. I'm very critical of CDPR but let's be reasonable.
Not yet. I imagine that will come later, as we approach the release date.Any information on pricing as of yet?
Not yet. I imagine that will come later, as we approach the release date.
Yeah let's....Blood and Wine is not half bad as you make it appear. Every CDPR expansion is so much better than what the competition is offering for your dollars. I do agree that the story in HoS is better but to say you'll pass a game just because it was "only" good and not exceptional, is not being resonable. IMO you should play more Ubisoft and EA games and then come back here. Be reasonable what we got is a fantastic game and we don't even have any info on Cyberpunk so no need to be pessimistic about that now.
poor Marcin.
Have you considered that I could also just not spend said money on an RPG at all? There's all kinds of things to spend that time and money on.
I'd prefer redkit....
Of course I have but then if you did that you wouldn't be here posting on this game forum. This tell me this game isn't that bad as you make it appear.
Yeah let's....Blood and Wine is not half bad as you make it appear. Every CDPR expansion is so much better than what the competition is offering for your dollars. I
Yes, at least then fans would be able to create their own and ever improving Enhanced Edition.
I liked Blood and Wine but then I'd already payed for it as part of the expansion pass (my bad). If it is the new baseline quality (which judging by all the praise, it may well be) I'll not buy new CDPR releases going forward, since further releases can't just lean on what's come before and existing invested interest.
That is not on the table. It's like they don't want to see the game changed except if it is by themselves
It's like they don't want to see the game changed except if it is by themselves