She clearly doesnt know what she is talking about and is doing so only to get attention.
HOWEVER lets be real here - CDPR is really investing on the sex factor. Selling sex and boob physics made the news recently, and the whole "if its pretty you can sleep with it" is getting out of hand, this might be actually one reason why they made ciri more manly.
If you look at it, In the withcer 2 there was one for everyone. There were woman for you to "have" of any color, of any type, long hair, short hair, blond, black, red. Even those whom you didnt sleep with you still saw a semi sexual scene, i.e. Philipa, Saskia, and so on. I personally just shrug it off and ignored it, but it was getting ridiculous in witcher 2, as I feel they are just blatantly exploiting female beauty on some teenage boys reaching their puberty. Dont get me wrong, everyone is doing it, even bioware which i hate, they even include homosexual and animal ("zoophilia?") relationship options in games so it will sit well with everyone, I will not be surprised if in the near future we see bioware also exploit underage as their source of attraction if they get a poll that there is a market for it.
But this brings me back to the original point, its Geralts, so he has to do it - he is known for it. But maybe we can cut back on the little random occurances? like those elven woman we saved from fire, the sleeping was completely unnecessary, an extraoridnary potion or a relic sword would have been much better as a reward, a choice given to us even during the Succubus quest which I enjoyed a lot until Flash ruined it in his mod and removed the item. We need more choices like this. You want to sleep with this girl? sure, but you will loose a great opportunity to get this item or do that quest etc . . . I think CDPR should reward us based on our choices and not being pushed to do it just because it took a lot of lonely nights to animate it.
Though sadly this post will be burried here, I would love to make a thread about it so we can discuss it but I doubt its allowed. I would like a developer to see this at least, and for once take a step back and say - maybe we gone too far.
HOWEVER lets be real here - CDPR is really investing on the sex factor. Selling sex and boob physics made the news recently, and the whole "if its pretty you can sleep with it" is getting out of hand, this might be actually one reason why they made ciri more manly.
If you look at it, In the withcer 2 there was one for everyone. There were woman for you to "have" of any color, of any type, long hair, short hair, blond, black, red. Even those whom you didnt sleep with you still saw a semi sexual scene, i.e. Philipa, Saskia, and so on. I personally just shrug it off and ignored it, but it was getting ridiculous in witcher 2, as I feel they are just blatantly exploiting female beauty on some teenage boys reaching their puberty. Dont get me wrong, everyone is doing it, even bioware which i hate, they even include homosexual and animal ("zoophilia?") relationship options in games so it will sit well with everyone, I will not be surprised if in the near future we see bioware also exploit underage as their source of attraction if they get a poll that there is a market for it.
But this brings me back to the original point, its Geralts, so he has to do it - he is known for it. But maybe we can cut back on the little random occurances? like those elven woman we saved from fire, the sleeping was completely unnecessary, an extraoridnary potion or a relic sword would have been much better as a reward, a choice given to us even during the Succubus quest which I enjoyed a lot until Flash ruined it in his mod and removed the item. We need more choices like this. You want to sleep with this girl? sure, but you will loose a great opportunity to get this item or do that quest etc . . . I think CDPR should reward us based on our choices and not being pushed to do it just because it took a lot of lonely nights to animate it.
Though sadly this post will be burried here, I would love to make a thread about it so we can discuss it but I doubt its allowed. I would like a developer to see this at least, and for once take a step back and say - maybe we gone too far.
Last edited:
