My apologies to moderators if this has been mentioned before. I have a small request to make about the "Good Game" mechanic.
At times it peeves me that I have given a good game to someone, especially someone who has only beaten me by a small margin, and this person does not send a good game to me in return. The entire match, for instance, can be totally absent of banter (I personally don't mind a bit of banter but no banter is good too) and move at a nice pace with plenty of time for each player to think and with no interruptions by those gamers who constantly like to bombard you with messages to "hurry up" etc and yet... still no good game. So... my request would be for a player to mark these perhaps less courteous players somehow at the end of a match so the player does not play them again, if the player so chooses. A "block" mechanic if you will. There are more than enough people playing the game so I think this should be fine.
i think it is reasonable to say that the more options a player has, the better a game is.
At times it peeves me that I have given a good game to someone, especially someone who has only beaten me by a small margin, and this person does not send a good game to me in return. The entire match, for instance, can be totally absent of banter (I personally don't mind a bit of banter but no banter is good too) and move at a nice pace with plenty of time for each player to think and with no interruptions by those gamers who constantly like to bombard you with messages to "hurry up" etc and yet... still no good game. So... my request would be for a player to mark these perhaps less courteous players somehow at the end of a match so the player does not play them again, if the player so chooses. A "block" mechanic if you will. There are more than enough people playing the game so I think this should be fine.
i think it is reasonable to say that the more options a player has, the better a game is.
Last edited by a moderator: