Nah, biggest outrage is bugs, from what ive seen in YouTube, most people did enjoyed storylineBecause more than half of people are not even able to play or finish the game because of the technical issues.
Nah, biggest outrage is bugs, from what ive seen in YouTube, most people did enjoyed storylineBecause more than half of people are not even able to play or finish the game because of the technical issues.
I agree with youGuess i'm one of the only 13 ppl happy with the current endings.. I've read through most comments in here and a lot of people argue that in the end no matter what you do, V dies so everything to that point is meaningless.
I disagree, first of all the premise of the story is that "there are no live legends", you have to die "possibly in a spectacular way, best if on a job" to get a drink named after you in the afterlife, that's one thing that might drive some people.
But after thinking for a while, didn't V die in the heist? (i might be mistaken here but from what i understood, V died due to Dex shooting us in the head and Viktor says the chip repaired our brain and started "overwriting", thus bringing us back) so technically V being an engram copy or not, doesn't change the fact that V died in the beginning and might already have lost his/her "soul". Also some might argue 6 months are a lot of time to come to terms with the fact that V is gonna die, plenty of time to do w/e. In the ending with Panam it's also hinted that they could travel and find some specialist to help V together.
Altho i prefer it that way because to me, it makes sense there's no happy ending in night city.
Personally i liked it and i can understand it might not be to everyone's taste, but that's no reason to hate so much on the devs.
Exactly. I just want the ending adjusted so I can find motivation again to dive back into NC.Im highly sceptical, but we having nothing to lose if way add something, everyone wins i guess
do those tarot graffittis really have an impact on the outcome?No need to modify them at all, just few simple changes in the dialogue at the end, depending on your choices in current sidequest and tarot card %.
Except it makes little sense to consider that a happy one. Why should the player care about a character that for a good portion of the story was abusive towards the main character and is simply a total douche in general? If I had my way, I'd be having braindances made of his torture.Agree. Thats why i say, that Johnny ending is best one, it feels more fitting for him to finish the story then V
Nope, nada. Gives false sense of rush I guess.do those tarot graffittis really have an impact on the outcome?
I don't know, man, I feel like that's how they expect you to feel, but the whole thing just feels completely violating to V. I truly think letting Johnny have the body is the worst ending, in a deeply repulsive sense; I think shooting yourself is preferable but I don't think I'm "supposed" to think that. Hell my skin crawls when Alt says you'll die if you go back to the body because "The body is Johnny's."the ending where Johnny and Rouge riding off is kinda sweet. they got their happy ending.
Totally with you. There is no lession learnt here. Life sucks and all your efforts are futile is not something i care to hear over and over again. Thus no desire to replay it.I've got to give credit where credit is due... I've been listening to the soundtrack in the last couple of days and it brings back the feelings of the moment perfectly. That only happens when a scene is powerful enough, which is something to strive for.
I didn't feel mad for getting a bad ending, that's part of the game and I messed up. The same happened in my first Witcher 3 playthrough.
No problem, time to fix things and give my V the good ending just like I gave Ciri. Except there's no ending for V as of now.
Most of them give room for redemption in the next entry, but do we really need such cliffhanger when the next game is years off at best?
In Witcher 3 you get a good ending for Ciri if you let her grow as a person. The message is clear: be there for her, but let her solve her own problems and grow confident.
In Cyberpunk 2077 the message is unclear for me as there's not one single preferable ending. You make a bunch of choices and pay a high price either way. Hard to conclude anything else than "life sucks".
The cyberpunk genre tells us that in such a future there are no heroes, Johnny tried to be one of them, blow up the Aposaki tower to fight the corporation (save alt) along the way killing 10,000 people, he paid for it, there is no place for heroes in this worldAgree. Thats why i say, that Johnny ending is best one, it feels more fitting for him to finish the story then V
better than let that arse of cancer live as youI don't know, man, I feel like that's how they expect you to feel, but the whole thing just feels completely violating to V. I truly think letting Johnny have the body is the worst ending, in a deeply repulsive sense; I think shooting yourself is preferable but I don't think I'm "supposed" to think that.
Johnny appears in many of the side quests, and is referenced in others, how would you explain him being still visible in those missions if you remove him successfully at the end?No need to modify them at all, just few simple changes in the dialogue at the end, depending on your choices in current sidequest and tarot card %.
Well, you have to consider his situation too, dude got royally fucked by corpo and suddenly you wake up 50 years later in some kind of body. And it makes interesting character progression when you transform it from hostile to friendlyExcept it makes little sense to consider that a happy one. Why should the player care about a character that for a good portion of the story was abusive towards the main character and is simply a total douche in general? If I had my way, I'd be having braindances made of his torture.![]()
Then make us play Jhonny from the getgo and tell a story Witcher style. Giving us a semi custome character only to become the sidecharacter is wierd and wrong.Well, you have to consider his situation too, dude got royally fucked by corpo and suddenly you wake up 50 years later in some kind of body. And it makes interesting character progression when you transform it from hostile to friendly
It is practicly the same, everything is the same as it is now, just few dialogue changes right at the end. It wouldnn't affect side missions at all.Johnny appears in many of the side quests, and is referenced in others, how would you explain him being still visible in those missions if you remove him successfully at the end?
If you leave city with aldecaldos you already a legend of night city, you attacked arosakas tower lolAnother way of fixing things up, pretty easy, without many changes in some endings.
1. Arasaka space station. You fought for Arasaka, sided with the devil, if you had low death % on tarot card, they do the surgery. Then you continue to do those tests but you keep getting better and finally Takemura says that you are healing up and free to return to the city, bam, fixed. If you had high % of death tarot card, they do the surgery and then say you are going to die or go to Mikoshi. Here you go, wanna do some more sidequests of characters that not gonna matter when you get healed (Rogue, Johnnys), if you do them, you will be out of time, here, a choice. People who want to continue, can go back in the city doing gigs and possible some side missions.
2.Aldecado ending. Could be quite similar, depending on % of Samurai card and Death card could be these options:
You give body to Johnny because you are out of time and you Will die in 6 months. Or you dont give the body, and then you go away with Aldecados with 6 months to live.
You made it in time, Johnny is sent into the net with Alt and you get fixed with Soulkiller. The catch is, there should be not much mentioned about what soulkiller does, let it be ambiguous as hell also remove the 6 month timer. Then you leave the city with your love interest but game could ask you, do you want to return to the NC. This ending would be the gray one, where you would have to question, is it a real V or a copy of V. Here, Done, only few dialogue changes.
3. The attack on Arasaka tower with Rogue. Could also be depended on tarrot cards. Would be similar to Aldecado ending honestly though. But aproach would be much different I guess. Except you don't leave the city. And there is no question if it is V or clone of V. Or it could stay as it is, didn't put much into this cuz doesn't seem like one of the more interesting ones. Become a legend, oh yeah, sounds rly interesting.
Post automatically merged:
Because Witcher 3 is based on the booksAnd you play as Geralt in 3rd person, means you are mostly leading him in his adventure rather than living it.
And CB2077 is a made up story by writers.
Not really, it doesn't excuse letting it out on everyone else, not to mention he was seemingly like this for the whole way through. Even how he treats his partners is nasty, there are really no redeeming qualities and I certainly didn't play the game to have my character be sidelined by a character like this.Well, you have to consider his situation too, dude got royally fucked by corpo and suddenly you wake up 50 years later in some kind of body. And it makes interesting character progression when you transform it from hostile to friendly
I don't even hate Johnny as a person. Just... becoming someone else, them taking over and living as you, is one of the worst fates I can imagine for a person.better than let that arse of cancer live as you
If you leave city with aldecaldos you already a legend of night city, you attacked arosakas tower lol
Why not to become a legend of all america?