Could use same biochipNot happening, no one is creating biochip for V. You need said person to die for chip to activate thats a gambling on itself.
Could use same biochipNot happening, no one is creating biochip for V. You need said person to die for chip to activate thats a gambling on itself.
The ending to NWN2 was continued in the expansion Mask of The Betrayer and it was an amazing expansion with satisfying endings and choices that mattered.I really feels the same like with the Neverwinter Nights 2 ending, ending is practically the same - dark and deppresing with bittter end.
Don't you dare bring logic into this conversation.One thing still bothers me with nomad ending. Alt says dna is only acceptign Johnny now. So put Johnny in body, put V in biochip and process reverts, wouldn't it?
Then Johnny gets to do some things before fading away for V. Johnny gets redemption arc as sacrificing for V.
Most people do tho. The reason why the nomad ending is the most popular and people are fine with it because it involves the two most popular love interests in it.Dunno, don't rly care much about romances for some reason, sometimes you can't have it all. I will enjoy even the smallest achievement that I can get.
Source?They wont respond, there is nothing to responds to. Story is finished, majority of people are actually like the story
NWN2 had one ending, and any variables were pretty much ignored in mask of the betrayer. MotB was almost a stand alone game with the same protagonist.The ending to NWN2 was continued in the expansion Mask of The Betrayer and it was an amazing expansion with satisfying endings and choices that mattered.
We can only hope the same will happen here.
Star Trek is about magic, not about realism at all. That's why they can "transfer" things.No. It is intentionally ambiguous as it is in most sci-fi subject matter. No one can prove the Ship of Theseus because it's a philosophical paradox.
Unless you can prove that Picard isn't Picard every time he deconstructs and reconstructs elsewhere through the use of a teleporter. Or the stacks in Altered Carbon are in fact consciously not the same person after the transport to a new sleeve.
The assumption in all sci-fi is that by some magical means the human conscious is not only maintained but restored perfectly on the other side of any given transfer. It's like the Star Trek: TNG episode where the audience sees a teleporter process through the eyes of Barclay.
This will probably end up cannon,Does it even matter? As soon as you jack into Mikoshi Alt hits you with Soulkiller. Bang, The End. The original V is now dead.
Then she uploads a copy back into the wiped brain of V, like copying files on a freshly formatted hard drive.
Go read reception.Source?
But if should. Laser guns were in CP2020, but the Collapse kind of screwed them all up. It's just that they're horribly expensive to use and build.Star Trek is about magic, not about realism at all. That's why they can "transfer" things.
There is a reason why C2077 doesn't have plasma and laser guns.
Well Arasaka station, it's original V that comes back just to die in 6 months or be consumed by Mikoshi.A "good" ending can only happen if there is an option to not get hit with Soulkiller once you jack into Mikoshi. And the only option not to do that, is to commit suicide.
The original V dies, in every ending. And in some endings V's copy either goes to cyberspace, to be gobbled up by Alt, or goes back to their body, to die in 6 months.
The V that we start the game as, has no chance at survival. And that's lazy and bad writing and not worthy of an RPG that promised meaningful "choices".
Go read reception.
Metacritic reviews, YouTube reviews, reddit comments.
Buddhist religion (symbolically dominant throughout the game) doesn't believe in the concept of the soul (Anatta). In fact, no one even knows what a soul actually is. It's such a nebulous concept that Soulkiller is just a name derived from Alt's own superstition that a soul is a physical, tangible entity.So what is the "soul" that Soulkiller destroys? Why is being hit by Soulkiller portrayed as a compromise?
I don't think it's ambiguous, for the record. At the very end there are dialogue choices where Alt straight up refers to you as a copy.
Yes. It's also assumed the consciousness is maintained in the transfer. Similar questions have been raised here. In theory the original version/of of the individual is 'killed' during the transfer. Barclay experiences a moment where his consciousness is paused during the transfer.So there is no ambiguity there. Once Soulkiller works on someone, the person dies and a copy is generated.
Excuse me? How is this any less magical than Netrunner's plugging their brains into a computer, Rogue AI's in cyberspace, and the data stream that Soulkiller uses to transfer the contents of a persons mind into aforementioned cyberspace? Science Fiction operates on a level of magic that is somewhat believable.Star Trek is about magic, not about realism at all. That's why they can "transfer" things.
There is a reason why C2077 doesn't have plasma and laser guns.
In the Arasaka ending you skip the soulkiller, and he isn't a vegetable by the end of it as someone claimed it above.A "good" ending can only happen if there is an option to not get hit with Soulkiller once you jack into Mikoshi. And the only option not to do that, is to commit suicide.
The original V dies, in every ending. And in some endings V's copy either goes to cyberspace, to be gobbled up by Alt, or goes back to their body, to die in 6 months.
The V that we start the game as, has no chance at survival. And that's lazy and bad writing and not worthy of an RPG that promised meaningful "choices".
Atleast one of the devs has said that Johnny's role was in fact smaller initially, but Keanu liked the character so much that he offered to do more dialogue, even going so far as supplying his own notes and ideas. So Johnny's role was expanded to the point that it's debatable who's actually the protagonist of the story.they went public a long, long time ago, before TW2 even. if it has any bearings on what's happening now, it stems from underlining problems withing the studio itself (i.e. bad management believing they are holier than thou because they made a lot of money once before)
I feel like there is a chance that before Keanu Jhonny's role in the game was smaller, V was more in the center of the plot, and a player had more opportunities to affect it. but who knows.
Right, I forgot that cause I had a flush of anger at the game. Arasaka was my first playthrough and I already ranted about that ending in my post a couple of pages back. Thanks for reminding me though, I corrected my post.Well Arasaka station, it's original V that comes back just to die in 6 months or be consumed by Mikoshi.
Dont take it out of context dude, we know why CP is getting shit on.![]()
Cyberpunk 2077
Cyberpunk 2077 for PC game reviews & Metacritic score: Cyberpunk 2077 is an open-world, action-adventure story set in Night City, a megalopolis obsessed with power, glamour and body modification. Assume the role of...www.metacritic.com
![]()
Cyberpunk 2077
Cyberpunk 2077 for PlayStation 4 game reviews & Metacritic score: Cyberpunk 2077 is an open-world, action-adventure story set in Night City, a megalopolis obsessed with power, glamour and body modification. Assume the role of...www.metacritic.com
![]()
Cyberpunk 2077
Cyberpunk 2077 for Xbox One game reviews & Metacritic score: Cyberpunk 2077 is an open-world, action-adventure story set in Night City, a megalopolis obsessed with power, glamour and body modification. Assume the role of...www.metacritic.com
![]()
Yeah, at the start V is in bad shape, but is getting better just for them to come and say nope, you are dying. Forget there are nanites that can fix neurological brain diseases. Can even hear it on the news in game that Biotech invented them and they are succesful.In the Arasaka ending you skip the soulkiller, and he isn't a vegetable by the end of it as someone claimed it above.