Forums
Games
Cyberpunk 2077 Thronebreaker: The Witcher Tales GWENT®: The Witcher Card Game The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt The Witcher 2: Assassins of Kings The Witcher The Witcher Adventure Game
Jobs Store Support Log in Register
Forums - CD PROJEKT RED
Menu
Forums - CD PROJEKT RED
  • Hot Topics
  • NEWS
  • GENERAL
    SUGGESTIONS
  • STORY
    MAIN JOBS SIDE JOBS GIGS
  • GAMEPLAY
  • TECHNICAL
    PC XBOX PLAYSTATION
  • COMMUNITY
    FAN ART (THE WITCHER UNIVERSE) FAN ART (CYBERPUNK UNIVERSE) OTHER GAMES
  • RED Tracker
    The Witcher Series Cyberpunk GWENT
MAIN JOBS
SIDE JOBS
GIGS
Menu

Register

[Spoiler Alert] About the endings

+

Do you want more RPGs with happy endings?

  • Yes, I miss happy endings.

    Votes: 405 45.2%
  • No, I am content with the endings currently offered.

    Votes: 81 9.0%
  • I think that the option should be available for those who want it.

    Votes: 264 29.5%
  • It’s more complicated than that.

    Votes: 146 16.3%

  • Total voters
    896
Prev
  • 1
  • …

    Go to page

  • 228
  • 229
  • 230
  • 231
  • 232
  • …

    Go to page

  • 528
Next
First Prev 230 of 528

Go to page

Next Last
PasDeBras

PasDeBras

Forum regular
#4,581
Dec 21, 2020
So, it's like you people didn't actually finish the game.
V doesn't die in every ending, at all.
Some of them he dies, some we're told by characters he will die in six months, and then, like for the aldecaldos, we're also told they will turn up every rock and every contact out there for a solution to v's condition.
If that doesn't spell sequel or dlc to you, i don't know what could.
 
  • RED Point
Reactions: Solidus2kill
Solidus2kill

Solidus2kill

Forum regular
#4,582
Dec 21, 2020
PasDeBras said:
So, it's like you people didn't actually finish the game.
V doesn't die in every ending, at all.
Some of them he dies, some we're told by characters he will die in six months, and then, like for the aldecaldos, we're also told they will turn up every rock and every contact out there for a solution to v's condition.
If that doesn't spell sequel or dlc to you, i don't know what could.
Click to expand...
I always said that all the endings are placeholder for Dlcs, and I think that cdpr will add free cut content to add more choices during the main storyline
 
  • RED Point
Reactions: MandyZGaming and acakomandos
C

cyths

Fresh user
#4,583
Dec 21, 2020
PasDeBras said:
If that doesn't spell sequel or dlc to you, i don't know what could.
Click to expand...
No offence, but I bought a game, not a 100+ hour cliffhanger.
 
  • RED Point
Reactions: Providur, MandyZGaming, Froste29 and 1 other person
MeinChurro

MeinChurro

Forum regular
#4,584
Dec 21, 2020
Solidus2kill said:
same thing happened with The Witcher 2, the first release was way to rushed and incomplete
Click to expand...
Yeah, but at least we got an RPG. :cry:
Post automatically merged: Dec 21, 2020

cyths said:
tbh i'm waiting for a patch or, more likely, a mod that cut's out this six month nonsense.

In fact they have done a good job on the characters since i'm ten time more mad about this shitty endings then about the bugs and CtD i encountered.
Click to expand...
It needs to come from CDPR not a mod, might as well make believe it's already cut out. Wouldn't be canon.
Post automatically merged: Dec 21, 2020

Ae_X_eS said:
Sooo....
To be honest in my opinion the ending where v gives up his body to save Jonny is the only satisfying for me.
Click to expand...
adfadf.png
 
Last edited: Dec 21, 2020
  • RED Point
Reactions: WildOrchid and MandyZGaming
Simuxas

Simuxas

Senior user
#4,585
Dec 21, 2020
PasDeBras said:
So, it's like you people didn't actually finish the game.
V doesn't die in every ending, at all.
Some of them he dies, some we're told by characters he will die in six months, and then, like for the aldecaldos, we're also told they will turn up every rock and every contact out there for a solution to v's condition.
If that doesn't spell sequel or dlc to you, i don't know what could.
Click to expand...
That is the problem, yes V doesn't die, but every ending ends up with giving V 6 months to live, it doesn't mean V dies, but considering the game just end there, we can only guess. And I doubt the DLC will bring up the endings (Would be scummy as hell), unless it's free or maybe a patch, I don't know, but at the moment V dies almost in every endings except the Arasaka one. Every other ending V gets soukilled and becomes basically, a copy of V ( there is huge debate on it though).
 
Miles_White

Miles_White

Fresh user
#4,586
Dec 21, 2020
I don't know if someone posted it and I missed it. But I just finished the Delamain side-quest, and that dude becomes a super AI who lives on the other side of the black-wall. AND he knows you're dying.

Couldn't he legitimately swoop in at the last minute and basically fix V? Outplay Alt and everyone else.

I haven't finished this play-through (and why would I if I die?), but knowing that Del is a digital GOD out there in the ether, and that doesn't affect the story at all seems like wasted material.
 
  • RED Point
Reactions: MandyZGaming and acakomandos
zeemanefekti

zeemanefekti

Fresh user
#4,587
Dec 21, 2020
Older Scandinavian cyberpunk enthusiast (as a genre) here and a posthumanist at heart. I truly did love all of the endings (except the quickest one for obvious reasons).

I really do not understand this backlash with the endings and especially the philosophical argument with an engram being different from its original human mind/soul. Just check SOMA and its story to see brilliant writing and discussion about digitalizing humans. Metaphysically I can argue that Silverhand is still himself and only himself, as the original human and its biological mind was destroyed by soulkiller during the copying process (there really is no possibility for two identical persons existing when soulkiller is used, which is kind of an easy way out for the writers). So why would this not apply for V, how is he/she "not himself/herself" when Alt uses soulkiller on him/her? Could it be that the idea of mind uploading is just uncomfortable for many players?

This is what really good scifi is about: making us think outside our current wordviews and moral/ethical standings. A cyberpunk story is not our world with netrunners and cyberware and set some years into the future, it is a fictional world based on our world. When a filthy rich person can pretty much live forever, how many would truly believe in a soul anymore?

I would have loved to see Alts side as well and how the assimilation process would actually change Alt when V with all the other Mikoshi engrams joined to Alt. This would have made the Johnny takes Vs body - ending way more interesting.
 
MeinChurro

MeinChurro

Forum regular
#4,588
Dec 21, 2020
Simuxas said:
That is the problem, yes V doesn't die, but every ending ends up with giving V 6 months to live, it doesn't mean V dies, but considering the game just end there, we can only guess. And I doubt the DLC will bring up the endings (Would be scummy as hell), unless it's free or maybe a patch, I don't know, but at the moment V dies almost in every endings except the Arasaka one. Every other ending V gets soukilled and becomes basically, a copy of V ( there is huge debate on it though).
Click to expand...
Yeah, easy retort. V DOES actually die in all the endings, except for Arasaka, because of soulkiller. Copy V is not V. They just had to tack that on to all of them.
Post automatically merged: Dec 21, 2020

zeemanefekti said:
Older Scandinavian cyberpunk enthusiast (as a genre) here and a posthumanist at heart. I truly did love all of the endings (except the quickest one for obvious reasons).

I really do not understand this backlash with the endings and especially the philosophical argument with an engram being different from its original human mind/soul. Just check SOMA and its story to see brilliant writing and discussion about digitalizing humans. Metaphysically I can argue that Silverhand is still himself and only himself, as the original human and its biological mind was destroyed by soulkiller during the copying process (there really is no possibility for two identical persons existing when soulkiller is used, which is kind of an easy way out for the writers). So why would this not apply for V, how is he/she "not himself/herself" when Alt uses soulkiller on him/her? Could it be that the idea of mind uploading is just uncomfortable for many players?

This is what really good scifi is about: making us think outside our current wordviews and moral/ethical standings. A cyberpunk story is not our world with netrunners and cyberware and set some years into the future, it is a fictional world based on our world. When a filthy rich person can pretty much live forever, how many would truly believe in a soul anymore?

I would have loved to see Alts side as well and how the assimilation process would actually change Alt when V with all the other Mikoshi engrams joined to Alt. This would have made the Johnny takes Vs body - ending way more interesting.
Click to expand...
SOMA is also a short linear horror game. Cyberpunk, is not.
 
  • RED Point
Reactions: MandyZGaming
Simuxas

Simuxas

Senior user
#4,589
Dec 21, 2020
Miles_White said:
I don't know if someone posted it and I missed it. But I just finished the Delamain side-quest, and that dude becomes a super AI who lives on the other side of the black-wall. AND he knows you're dying.

Couldn't he legitimately swoop in at the last minute and basically fix V? Outplay Alt and everyone else.

I haven't finished this play-through (and why would I if I die?), but knowing that Del is a digital GOD out there in the ether, and that doesn't affect the story at all seems like wasted material.
Click to expand...
If you havn't realized yet, writers specificly wrote the story to massively screw V in every way possible. It's like they had some masochistic fetish or something. :shrug:
 
  • RED Point
Reactions: MandyZGaming
MeinChurro

MeinChurro

Forum regular
#4,590
Dec 21, 2020
Miles_White said:
I don't know if someone posted it and I missed it. But I just finished the Delamain side-quest, and that dude becomes a super AI who lives on the other side of the black-wall. AND he knows you're dying.

Couldn't he legitimately swoop in at the last minute and basically fix V? Outplay Alt and everyone else.

I haven't finished this play-through (and why would I if I die?), but knowing that Del is a digital GOD out there in the ether, and that doesn't affect the story at all seems like wasted material.
Click to expand...
If Delemain swooped in outta nowhere and he did that, and that was our "happy" ending. I wouldn't complain. Del at the rescue yet again!
 
Cyber.D.G.

Cyber.D.G.

Forum regular
#4,591
Dec 21, 2020
Simuxas said:
If you havn't realized yet, writers specificly wrote the story to massively screw V in every way possible. It's like they had some masochistic fetish or something. :shrug:
Click to expand...
Yep. They also pushing players to choose "Silverhand gets V's body" ending so hard, that it feels almost disguasting.
 
  • RED Point
Reactions: Ninivekha, MandyZGaming and MeinChurro
Simuxas

Simuxas

Senior user
#4,592
Dec 21, 2020
zeemanefekti said:
Older Scandinavian cyberpunk enthusiast (as a genre) here and a posthumanist at heart. I truly did love all of the endings (except the quickest one for obvious reasons).

I really do not understand this backlash with the endings and especially the philosophical argument with an engram being different from its original human mind/soul. Just check SOMA and its story to see brilliant writing and discussion about digitalizing humans. Metaphysically I can argue that Silverhand is still himself and only himself, as the original human and its biological mind was destroyed by soulkiller during the copying process (there really is no possibility for two identical persons existing when soulkiller is used, which is kind of an easy way out for the writers). So why would this not apply for V, how is he/she "not himself/herself" when Alt uses soulkiller on him/her? Could it be that the idea of mind uploading is just uncomfortable for many players?

This is what really good scifi is about: making us think outside our current wordviews and moral/ethical standings. A cyberpunk story is not our world with netrunners and cyberware and set some years into the future, it is a fictional world based on our world. When a filthy rich person can pretty much live forever, how many would truly believe in a soul anymore?

I would have loved to see Alts side as well and how the assimilation process would actually change Alt when V with all the other Mikoshi engrams joined to Alt. This would have made the Johnny takes Vs body - ending way more interesting.
Click to expand...
Yes the endings with soulkiller would have been good, but the fact that the game still goes "Gonna die in 6 months" was really unnecessary, should have left the endings with question - is it real V or a copy of V, if so, is it actually a human anymore. And the fact that 2 of those endings Rogue one and Aldecado have pretty much the same outcome is kind of lazy.
Attack arasaka, go into mikoshi, get soulkilled then cutscene the end.
 
LambachRuthven

LambachRuthven

Fresh user
#4,593
Dec 21, 2020
So I got to the end and boy I am truly sad to see these garbage endings.

But first things first. My playthrough was as a woman and I emphasized with Johnny every chance I got. That left me with 60% approval, because obviously Johnny can only be "bromanced" otherwise he just thinks you are a suck up. So that left the first sour note in my mouth.
So I allowed Johnny to go in and was shocked by how bad the revelation was delivered, that V has only 6 months to live. This should be the peak moment, but it was a bleak scene in a bleak cyberspace. So I allowed Johnny to take V and then came perhaps the most menaningless ending in a computer RPG I ever encountered and I am playing these since Ultima 6.
I am forced to have a conversation with some random kid I totally not care one bit about his guitar teachings. Wait what? Then Johnny just sits on the bus and leaves Night City.
Credits roll und ALL my friends write to me, that I don't answer my phone. The f* what? You tell me that Johnny - who was there along the ride always - witnessed the story of Judy and my romance with her and he wouldn't even have the decency to just call her and tell her what transpired? To at least give V the props before her friends and lover who just went through hell these past few weeks? Now Judy will think V is alive but just ghosted her and everyone else.
He wouldn't even tell Kerry, just burn all bridges and let V be remembered as some false friend who just ghosted everyone. WHAT? We talked about becoming a legend all the time, but when V dies a heroic death to let him live out HER live. He just decides, that is somethingnot even Vs lover has not the right to know.
Yeah, thanks a lot Johnny. You just are one stupid a*hole talking about morales and decency while having absolutely none of that. I died a hero and nobody ever knew, because the guy that was all about being a legend decides that it is more convenient for him if V doesn't become one.

Second try I go with Panem. I like Panem, but I always hated her ""family" the avocados. Wanted to talk her out of remaining with them, but couldn't because this is no RPG at all. I thought the decision while holding the pills is just who will help me to reach Mikoshi. I felt the avocados are expendable and enough to make a good distraction.
There was NO HINT AT ALL that this is also the decision how I want to spend the rest of my days. It shouldn't be. Just beacause I go in with Johnny, doesn't mean I want to become a legend. And going in with Panem sure as hell doesn't mean I want to become trailer trash and part of a family with the emotional maturity of a bunch of 7 years old. The constant bickering of these fools was unbearable, but the game just shoves this family as something other than a nightmare down my throat: I hated them, every last one of them. I would rather be stuck in Cyberhell for eternity, than to spend one day at their trailer park trash camp.
And after coming back at V I finally get a scene with Judy. Great. Or that I thought because I couldn't even tell her the truth, after all she is been through. Lame romance, lame scene, lame talk, din't touch me at all.

I am a runner who fucking loves the city. I. LOVE. NIGHT. CITY.
I love style. I hate people in their underwear holding a beer while wearing flip flops. Thats why I bought a game called CYBERPUNK.

I don't know why the story tries so hard for us to prefer living with emotional childs on trash heaps in the badlands, then to enjoy snytheic clothes, stlye over substance and chrome and latex in the city?
I date a Night City cop and think he is really cool. Then this cool cop decides to move to the trailer park and become trailer trash. WTF?
Then I date a cool netrunner who produces porn braindances. Cool. Yeah, then she just wants to leave everything and live like a farmgirl. WTF?
Then I help my girl Panem and try to talk her into leaving her kindergarten family and join me in Night City, but no can do.

I played this game to live out my shadowrun fantasy of chrome and synthetic leather. I wanted to live in high style, having visible cyberware and wearing only the coolest clothes. Instead I get bullied into this campfire atmosphere of people living in absoluty dirt and behaving like abused children, always good for a cry.

This CYBERPUNK feeling was very strong hearing the absolute cool combat music while slicing through corporate punks with my Katana. But none of the endings have any of this 'cool to the core' vibe the game itsself has, when you are not in these goddamn badlands.

This game has absolute zero replayability at this point. This nihilistic storytelling is BS and I say that as someone who leads a shadowrun pen & paper campaign now for 21 years in succession with characters who have become goods through more than 10.000h playtime. Nobody wants to get another serving of nothingness. If that is all you have to share, then just don't.
It seemed to me you loved your own setting very much at first and hated it by the time you hammered together these excuses for endings.

This is in no way an RPG, as Assassins Creed has more important decisions. It feels like half of the content is missing. The "romances" are just a joke. They have absolutely zero impact after one short scene.

And to end this rant: I expected this game to be for adults, as was marketed, but it is very harmless and conventional and tries absolutely nothing new. I can not even get naked because ... yeah why?
 
  • RED Point
Reactions: Ninivekha, Criuion, Mr_Nobody96 and 5 others
MeinChurro

MeinChurro

Forum regular
#4,594
Dec 21, 2020
Finally somebody giving some hard criticism on that stupid Nomad ending! (y) @LambachRuthven

Welcome to the club of people who hate these endings!
 
  • RED Point
Reactions: Mr_Nobody96 and MandyZGaming
torsa474

torsa474

Fresh user
#4,595
Dec 21, 2020
worldcompany said:
All the seven ends are really dark and sad. Like really. we need a happy ending.


Edit: What do you think of the alternative endings, all of them are sad, and from what I see that people want at least one a happy one, atleast like a Top secret-Easter Egg, at least to achieve it with legendary clothes and level 50, or at least in extreme hard mode. What would be the best idea to fit?
Click to expand...

I think the endings are rushed. I think they had other endings in mind because they did say that they had an interesting way for us to continue after the main story. I mean, it is an interesting way to do it the way they did it, but not interesting in any good way. FFS, that is way to do it!? So I think they had other things in mind, but no time to implement it, at least I hope so.
 
Froste29

Froste29

Forum regular
#4,596
Dec 21, 2020
Miles_White said:
I don't know if someone posted it and I missed it. But I just finished the Delamain side-quest, and that dude becomes a super AI who lives on the other side of the black-wall. AND he knows you're dying.

Couldn't he legitimately swoop in at the last minute and basically fix V? Outplay Alt and everyone else.

I haven't finished this play-through (and why would I if I die?), but knowing that Del is a digital GOD out there in the ether, and that doesn't affect the story at all seems like wasted material.
Click to expand...
I think the Delamain choice was kept in store for a DLC.
Would fit nicely in my idea from earlier that I would dub "AI's vs NetWatch - The Blackwall War"
 
tRYSIS3

tRYSIS3

Forum regular
#4,597
Dec 21, 2020
PasDeBras said:
So, it's like you people didn't actually finish the game.
V doesn't die in every ending, at all.
Some of them he dies, some we're told by characters he will die in six months, and then, like for the aldecaldos, we're also told they will turn up every rock and every contact out there for a solution to v's condition.
If that doesn't spell sequel or dlc to you, i don't know what could.
Click to expand...
We are also told by CDPR that they won't "withhold story content for DLC", which would exactly be the case if we got such DLC.

Also, not many players got to the Nomad ending, which was optional, making it even less likely to be canon. Do you really think they are going to discard all the work they did in NC so they can build a DLC based around the Arizona desert?

That is without even considering the fact that there are 3 paths in the game, and it would absolutely make no sense for them to force all players to go into a Nomad storyline.
 
  • RED Point
Reactions: MandyZGaming, Barsenthor and MeinChurro
acakomandos

acakomandos

Forum regular
#4,598
Dec 21, 2020
Miles_White said:
I don't know if someone posted it and I missed it. But I just finished the Delamain side-quest, and that dude becomes a super AI who lives on the other side of the black-wall. AND he knows you're dying.

Couldn't he legitimately swoop in at the last minute and basically fix V? Outplay Alt and everyone else.

I haven't finished this play-through (and why would I if I die?), but knowing that Del is a digital GOD out there in the ether, and that doesn't affect the story at all seems like wasted material.
Click to expand...
He probably could but hey, we can only and wait for dlc to see if they will save their sorry ass
 
MeinChurro

MeinChurro

Forum regular
#4,599
Dec 21, 2020
torsa474 said:
I think the endings are rushed. I think they had other endings in mind because they did say that they had an interesting way for us to continue after the main story. I mean, it is an interesting way to do it the way they did it, but not interesting in any good way. FFS, that is way to do it!? So I think they had other things in mind, but no time to implement it, at least I hope so.
Click to expand...
Interesting way my butt! The interesting way is you are copy V now? I guess? And we can't even play after the main story right now. So many lies... or cut content.
 
  • RED Point
Reactions: acakomandos
acakomandos

acakomandos

Forum regular
#4,600
Dec 21, 2020
tRYSIS3 said:
We are also told by CDPR that they won't "withhold story content for DLC", which would exactly be the case if we got such DLC.

Also, not many players got to the Nomad ending, which was optional, making it even less likely to be canon. Do you really think they are going to discard all the work they did in NC so they can build a DLC based around the Arizona desert?

That is without even considering the fact that there are 3 paths in the game, and it would absolutely make no sense for them to force all players to go into a Nomad storyline.
Click to expand...
Well they can send players to arisona. Like some random ass dude calls offering solution for a price? Some missons or something
 
Prev
  • 1
  • …

    Go to page

  • 228
  • 229
  • 230
  • 231
  • 232
  • …

    Go to page

  • 528
Next
First Prev 230 of 528

Go to page

Next Last
Share:
Facebook Twitter Reddit Pinterest Tumblr WhatsApp Email Link
  • English
    English Polski (Polish) Deutsch (German) Русский (Russian) Français (French) Português brasileiro (Brazilian Portuguese) Italiano (Italian) 日本語 (Japanese) Español (Spanish)

STAY CONNECTED

Facebook Twitter YouTube
CDProjekt RED
  • Contact administration
  • User agreement
  • Privacy policy
  • Cookie policy
  • Press Center
© 2018 CD PROJEKT S.A. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED

CD PROJEKT®, Cyberpunk®, Cyberpunk 2077® are registered trademarks of CD PROJEKT S.A. © 2018 CD PROJEKT S.A. All rights reserved. All other copyrights and trademarks are the property of their respective owners.

Forum software by XenForo® © 2010-2020 XenForo Ltd.