It's not that I hate him for being bad, I love Handsome Jack in Borderlands. He's mean, petty, childish he's everything hateful but he's amazing at it. You have to hate him, he's irredeemable.
More like Blade Runner movie, where Roy fails to prolong his life and dies, and Rick gets a life of constant running and fear for his woman.
Don't you think you have more in common with temerian peasant than with legendary witcher?
Why not? Han got divorced from the princess and was murdered by his son, Luke went into sadness beard isolation because he fucked up his nephew, and Leia had to leave Republic government and lead a shittier version of the Rebellion because of the resurgence of space fascism. All three of them saw the ideals and promise of their youth squandered and destroyed, and went on to lead sad, isolated lives.
Original Bladerunner had Rachel and Decker go off and live happily ever after. It was the director who retconned that.
Nah, bad writing, logical holes and outright exploitation of fanbase for money. Disney is also megacorp.
And the final version was more world-fitting. Rachel died giving childbirth and Rick sacrificed everything to protect his child from vivisection by corps.
Original was made due to Philip K. Dick giving his blessing. Someone always thinks they're smarter than the writer/creator, sadly many believe the director is god.
I disagree. Exactly that reaction is good writing and comes pretty close to what I would say to a terrorist myself, lol.
What does it matter? Okay, i understand that many people desperately want to escape from reality in happily hereafter, no matter how dark and cruel is the world. But this is all a lie. Sometimes there is simply no good ending, no matter how hard hero fought.
Especially since it invalidated every achievement that was made in the OT. At the start of Ep. 7 we basically are back at Ep. 4.
Why does it matter if the movie stays true to the book? Why does it matter if some hack butchers original work??
The original ending was left ambiguous, is Decker a human or a replicant and I love that movie and the ending, it was perfect. Here in CP2077 every endings is kind of stupid, over explained or both. Writers. didn't stop when they should have and they stopped when they shouldn't have.
True enough, the writing of CP77 is imperfect, no argument here
What they frankly should have done with the supposed secret mission was to give player a timer in the missions, something like COD 4 plane mission, if you make it in time, Alt can remove Johnny without any side effects and V goes back to the city being merc, etc.
Movie is independent fiction, with no obligation to follow source to the letter.
When even movie about dark Cyberpunk future has multiple, different taste endings, and the game doesn't, kind of makes you think, doesn't it?
That's one way to handle this. Other people in this thread proposed some forms of "Johny-meter" mechanic, with side jobs to decrease/increase johny-metter and eventually to keep it low enough for Alt to remove Johny with no 6 months problem. I liked how Mass Effext 2 handled the suicide run.
What achievements? Life goes on. The Empire was defeated, the New Republic founded. But life goes on. The sequels did not invalidate anything, they just continued telling a story, with previous characters making appearances (and obviously they had a life, but not a fairy-tale happy ever after life)...giving us possibly the best new characters of all trilogies...if only Rise of Skywalker had been a two-parter...
It does! And i'm perfectly good with addition of good ending to existing set
Nah, what they should have done, is make a completely different story. People already disliked how Witcher 3 portrays the main quest as a race against time, in Cyberpunk, they cranked that up to 5000.
