I am very curious as wellI'm curious what will that involve. Going by the witcher DLCs, prolly just some extra car/nike models, new game + and some alternative outfits.
I am very curious as wellI'm curious what will that involve. Going by the witcher DLCs, prolly just some extra car/nike models, new game + and some alternative outfits.
Nah, I also got my happy ending.wait....seriously
Am I the only one to get the Happy Ending on the first go around?? So many people here thinking there is no happy ending....I was more shocked people were moaning about on December 10!!!!! WTF lol
That's one way to look at the numbers, another way would be 10% of people are satisfied with how the game ended. Now i think that number is probably higher than what the poll reflects but it's still really on the lowside even if you double/triple it.We will have to agree to disagree that its disrespectful at all.
We dont know what will happen with V long term, but I rather like the ambiguity. I get that 46% of player would prefer there be some sort of happy ending, but Night City's not a place for purely happy endings.
I got 3 endings so far,wait....seriously
Am I the only one to get the Happy Ending on the first go around?? So many people here thinking there is no happy ending....I was more shocked people were moaning about on December 10!!!!! WTF lol
I'm gonna vouch for myself as one of the people who voted for "It's more complicated than that". I don't necessarily have a problem with how the game ended, but rather, when the game ended. I just feel as though the whole story was way to short, It honestly doesn't bother me that V is supposedly gonna die in 6 months (I don't think he really is, but even if he did, people die what can ya do). I would like post-game DLC to come out to just pick up where we left off and potentially find a cure too that would be a nice cherry on top.That's one way to look at the numbers, another way would be 10% of people are satisfied with how the game ended. Now i think that number is probably higher than what the poll reflects but it's still really on the lowside even if you double/triple it.
Really, really sums up the 2020 experience. Gives you the warm fuzzies inside, honestly.Cyberpunk 2077 - the story of a young idiot in NC, who jumps to all the wrong conclusions and makes a lot of bad decisions and then proceeds to kill a lot of people, before either:
die within 6 months as disabled person
commit suicide
get killed while jacking into Mikoshi and trusting a rogue AI
get killed, with an engram copy remaining behind, property of Arasaka
In some of these endings your engram copy also dies 6 months later.
Oh joy....
An excellent point, which unfortunately gets in the way of forcing players to choose “dying, digital, or dead” to either set up expansion packs/sequels or create some easy misery so the answer is probably “because nanites can see the extra V in the brain meat” or something fun.i'd like an ending that actually makes sense... v's body or it's dna has been altered to fit johnny's (i get that), the engram is the digital reconstruction of the information that makes up V's memories and personality. the engram... it's not biological at all, it doesn't have dna to conflict with the rewritten dna now in v's body. so how is V's body supposed to reject the engram at all?
---edit i do only have a high school level understanding of biology & genetics... even i know their ending just doesn't compute.
Why are we still here? Just to suffer?Cyberpunk 2077 - the story of a young idiot in NC, who jumps to all the wrong conclusions and makes a lot of bad decisions and then proceeds to kill a lot of people, before either:
die within 6 months as disabled person
commit suicide
get killed while jacking into Mikoshi and trusting a rogue AI
get killed, with an engram copy remaining behind, property of Arasaka
In some of these endings your engram copy also dies 6 months later.
Oh joy....
I get your point but I disagree so many others. I know this is a game, and I would play anything that gives me more content and experiences to go through and I probably will , BUT lets think about the narrative for a sec, say its between act 2 and act3 ( ending) , after act2 you are in pretty bad shape( pressure wise ofcourse) so why would you go on some random adventure UNLESS it can somehow affect act3, which I dont think it would unless that DLC is free, this is what most people are saying who are against mid game expansion.I dont see V's likely death as rendering what happens before worse. Every man dies, but not every man really lives. Literally every mortal character we've ever played as in a video game will die at some point in the future. It doesn't take away the experiences we the players have with those characters.
That's sad and unjust, but logical game-wise. Judy and Panam have solid reasons to hate NC and leave it for good. Kerry and River, on a contrary, have everything in the city: job, family, they are not so easily moveable. Kerry's career has a rebirth, River feels obliged to stay with his sister and nephews. So they dump V in nomad ending, as Judy and Panam dump V in any ending where V stays in NC. Bitter, but logical.No, I meant that only people that romanced either Judy or Panam can get the "best" ending of the game. If you romanced River or, in my case, Kerry, both of them will break up with you if you choose The Star ending.
Most of people nowadays seek escapism in general, in a stories where protagonist can suffer losses and defeats, but eventually survives and prospers. Also, many players demand after-ending gameplay with their overpowered characters.Wait what, a dystopian sci-fi story does not have fairy tale ending? How rude!
But to be serious, I do not think that it is good that we get used to positive endings so much that people demand them, reducing stories to just form of cheap escapism like 80's action movie.
Not to mention that too many stories with good ending devalue those good endings that actually fits the story.
To be honest, i've just finished Streetkid run, and V did tell about leaving the city. He gradially grew tired and sick of NC, as i could judge from his own pre-scripted dialogues and comments throghout the game. And in the nomad ending i got Streetkid dialogue option, where V realized that ther is nothing valuable left in NC for him, that he is done with this city. And i agree, the NC is cancer, and it is not the only city in America, even not the most rich and advanced technologically. So nomad ending does not decrease V's chance for finding the cure. The world of Cyberpunk does not revolves around NC.They renove the chip and V is improving, but since there was too much dmg, V is still dying. It is the most logical one. Seek help from someone who made the chip also Takemura is there to possibly check if they arent going to screw you, cuz V did save him.
Just because you leave NC with someone you had sex ones, doesnt mean its the best option. As i said, V never considered leaving nc, not to mention if you start as Corpo or strert kid.
You already got revived by the relic once, after literally dying it replacing missing grey matter with who knows what then your personality got altered by Johnny, being a “copy” is the least of your worries.Why are we still here? Just to suffer?
View attachment 11118635
Well it is based on PnP that is all about NC. Spending so much time on creating one city for the gsme and then just completely ditching it doesnt make sense.To be honest, i've just finished Streetkid run, and V did tell about leaving the city. He gradially grew tired and sick of NC, as i could judge from his own pre-scripted dialogues and comments throghout the game. And in the nomad ending i got Streetkid dialogue option, where V realized that ther is nothing valuable left in NC for him, that he is done with this city. And i agree, the NC is cancer, and it is not the only city in America, even not the most rich and advanced technologically. So nomad ending does not decrease V's chance for finding the cure. The world of Cyberpunk does not revolves around NC.