Well, if you got bad steak, at least you can eat the fries and pass the steak).
No. I get a new steak, because I payed for a steak with fires and not fries with a steak that taste like crap.
I dont expect them to work extreme magic on the endings... I could live with very well made sidemission, who alter the endings in a way that really saves V.
Addition effort should be rewarded in a game and this is where cp2077 fails to deliver.
Minimalistic playthrough plus penam sidemission is exactly like completionist plus penal sidemission - this is a problem.
Yes, and the new steak is total game remaster. Plot DLC many people here dream about is like good sauce to already bad steak).
you can't get new steaks because they all taste like crap
It's not in the game.
Alt tells you she can cure you. It doesn't work out that way. Takemura tells you Arasaka can cure you. It doesn't work out that way. Now Panam tells you she knows people in Arizona and she assures you will be cured, because no particular reason. V agrees, also because no particular reason.
Despite this, you chose to just believe in Panam's optimism, who offers no actual reason why we should be optimistic. You just go ahead believing V is going to be cured. But don't pretend that it's the writers' intention to tell us this is what's going to happen. Because the game actually tells us the opposite. It tells us not to believe the promisses of a cure. It's your choice to believe in the cure, not the writers'.
Panam really has no idea how all of this works and V too has always had to rely on others' expertise (Vik, Hellman, Alt). They're both completely unqualified to make any credible prediction about V's health. What they are qualified to do, is to "never stop fighting". And that's what they chose to do. And no, the Tarot does not confirm V is going to be cured. It doesn't refute it either, but I don't need that to doubt baseless promises.
Exactly. Which is why I'm confident we'll be seeing more of V in the future.
In this case, I will not go to that steakhouse again...
Just weighing the odds and hedging my bets.
It's more likely for a studio to go with established characters than to reinvent the wheel and come up with a new character for a DLC.
That will probably bankrupt them... Or not, given that this thread is the only nest of unsatisfied nitpickers, Reddit discussions and YouTube comments have mixed opinions at best. Not even a sign of organized protest like cake spam of Bioware office after ME3, so i actually doubt we, nitpickers, can really affect anything, we are few.
On this we agree.
In addition, we would need a new back story, unless we play as an already established character like rogue or just put a new datashard with some remembered BS into our socket.
All bad attempts...
Yes, and that would probably be side campaigns, totaly unrelated to main plot. Probably even in Act 1, before the Heist, so players could enjoy it and friendship with Jackie without false urgency)
Because mass effect 3 was a total clusterfuck. Here, it's only the endings.
Most people don't even finish the bloody game.
Even if they don't change anything... It's their loss and it saves my precious time...
The endings, the bugs, the performance issues, the cut content, etc... I could go on forever, its definitely not "just the endings"
Also unlike EA, CDPR don't have other projects to fall back on, it's either now or never
Dunno, i enjoyed the ME3 well enough right before the endings. And most players would probably agree to me in that, even the people who abhor ME3 endings.
My argument stands. I think CD Projekt can withstand our dissapointment here and stick to their plans without any adjustments.
Stupid for us, a few nitpickers. Most of the players will probably eat this just fine. Most of the players do not have problems with endings as they are, so there is no sense for CD Projekt to change their roadmap, established long before the release.
That implies they actually have a plan..
I mean. If this whole fatalism at the end is just there to give a common ground for story expansions, OK...