Forums
Games
Cyberpunk 2077 Thronebreaker: The Witcher Tales GWENT®: The Witcher Card Game The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt The Witcher 2: Assassins of Kings The Witcher The Witcher Adventure Game
Jobs Store Support Log in Register
Forums - CD PROJEKT RED
Menu
Forums - CD PROJEKT RED
  • Hot Topics
  • NEWS
  • GENERAL
    SUGGESTIONS
  • STORY
    MAIN JOBS SIDE JOBS GIGS
  • GAMEPLAY
  • TECHNICAL
    PC XBOX PLAYSTATION
  • COMMUNITY
    FAN ART (THE WITCHER UNIVERSE) FAN ART (CYBERPUNK UNIVERSE) OTHER GAMES
  • RED Tracker
    The Witcher Series Cyberpunk GWENT
MAIN JOBS
SIDE JOBS
GIGS
Menu

Register

[Spoiler Alert] About the endings

+

Do you want more RPGs with happy endings?

  • Yes, I miss happy endings.

    Votes: 492 42.6%
  • No, I am content with the endings currently offered.

    Votes: 115 10.0%
  • I think that the option should be available for those who want it.

    Votes: 343 29.7%
  • It’s more complicated than that.

    Votes: 205 17.7%

  • Total voters
    1,155
Prev
  • 1
  • …

    Go to page

  • 456
  • 457
  • 458
  • 459
  • 460
  • …

    Go to page

  • 752
Next
First Prev 458 of 752

Go to page

Next Last
andrezzyn

andrezzyn

Forum regular
#9,141
Dec 31, 2020
tRYSIS3 said:
I see what you mean, I just find it not effective from a storytelling standpoint.

If you end the first game saying that "there is no cure / you will die" and start the second game by "finding a cure", then you are basically saying that what you said earlier was nonsense. It's "bait and switch" and it pretty much undermines the writers' ability.

Imagine in GOT **SPOILERS** they bring back characters like Joffrey or Ned Stark in the next episode following their deaths, saying that they found a "cure" or any other excuse? The writers would be immediately clowned. This seems pretty obvious to me which is why I think the endings are final
Click to expand...
The endings that V stays alive ends with him having 6 more months to live, enough time for several Dlcs in search of a cure.


GOT **SPOILERS** Didn't they do that with Jon Snow? xD
 
  • RED Point
Reactions: TintelFruit
Rawls

Rawls

Moderator
#9,142
Dec 31, 2020
tRYSIS3 said:
I see what you mean, I just find it not effective from a storytelling standpoint.

If you end the first game saying that "there is no cure / you will die" and start the second game by "finding a cure", then you are basically saying that what you said earlier was nonsense. It's "bait and switch" and it pretty much undermines the writers' ability.

Imagine in GOT **SPOILERS** they bring back characters like Joffrey or Ned Stark in the next episodes following their deaths, saying that they found a "cure" or any other excuse? The writers would be immediately clowned.

This seems pretty obvious to me which is why I think the endings are final
Click to expand...
The did bring back Jon Snow two episodes later. It was great.
 
  • RED Point
Reactions: MandyZGaming, TintelFruit and andrezzyn
TintelFruit

TintelFruit

Forum regular
#9,143
Dec 31, 2020
tRYSIS3 said:
I see what you mean, I just find it not effective from a storytelling standpoint.

If you end the first game saying that "there is no cure / you will die" and start the second game by "finding a cure", then you are basically saying that what you said earlier was nonsense. It's "bait and switch" and it pretty much undermines the writers' ability.

Imagine in GOT **SPOILERS** they bring back characters like Joffrey or Ned Stark in the next episodes following their deaths, saying that they found a "cure" or any other excuse? The writers would be immediately clowned.

This seems pretty obvious to me which is why I think the endings are final
Click to expand...
V isn’t dead yet, how is it you don’t understand this?
Post automatically merged: Dec 31, 2020

andrezzyn said:
The endings that V stays alive ends with him having 6 more months to live, enough time for several Dlcs in search of a cure.


GOT **SPOILERS** Didn't they do that with Jon Snow? xD
Click to expand...
Oof I think they did.
 
B

bcraig6010

Senior user
#9,144
Dec 31, 2020
Rawls said:
The did bring back Jon Snow two episodes later. It was great.
Click to expand...
Agreed. But they had one narrative and one world.

They didn't have to deal with so many other people/world status who are in binary dead/alive status outside of V
Status or Corp War
Rogue - dead/alive or even owner of bar
Where romance interests are or even still romance interests
Arasaka strong or weak

its why I'm saddened and not hopeful.
 
  • RED Point
Reactions: JuanEvil
Barsenthor

Barsenthor

Senior user
#9,145
Dec 31, 2020
Subenu said:
Either I misunderstand or others do but never said Panam the cure would be in Arizona. And even if she doesn't really know what V went through her "message" was kinda like this (hope for clarification or correction if it's wrong):
Don't worry, we will find a cure. We know lots of people in Arizona who might be able to help you. They were able to solve issues far worse than your problem. It will be alright.

-Not original but the essence of the message should go like that.

TL;DR
Panam didn't say there is a cure, but she knows people who might know people and solutions to the problem. Kinda like that.
Click to expand...
So basically the premise of Act 2, it could be called Act 2 2.0 /s Sorry for a bad joke.

I know why Panam ending is popular because for majority of people it the least bad one and heterosexual male V and lesbian V can be with their SO (ofc no rest for the wicked for the heterosexual female V and gay V).
Yet the reasons why this is a “happy” ending are based on this imagination
- tarot cards could be just hunting game, in game Easter egg. Game says this by for ex portraying Misty who could be made more credible, yet she says that she don’t know much about tarot. Use of the cards also theory of probability and subconscious.
- than there is that Panam will find the why. And this is where we are back to my bad joke.

also we won’t know what was true since the story could be already retconned.
but up to this point game went lengths to hammer down most loophole there was.
It also never made any basics beginnings truly foreshadowing whats next.

We could get to know more about BioTechnica yet we know that they are just some dealings with them, nothing serious and even Panam is against dealing with them (yes yes I know she loves male V and she will surely change her mind)
They could make Alt not to say staff about 6 months. Like I don’t know how long you will live, damage has been done but I can’t say for sure.

Above all why to make next chapter about previous chapters? Like this lore is so empty that we can only care about ourselves? Like no 5th corpo war, no gang of 4, no Blue Eyes People?

we need to really running in circles?

I don’t buy it. And DLC if they will give us next chapter that fixes bad endings are are just there to fix something that should be good from the beginning.

Rawls said:
The did bring back Jon Snow two episodes later. It was great.
Click to expand...
It was as great as GoT final. Foreshadowing at it finest. The last time for me it was with ME2 where I was like “it seems that something jammed in writing department”
 
Rawls

Rawls

Moderator
#9,146
Dec 31, 2020
bcraig6010 said:
Agreed. But they had one narrative and one world.

They didn't have to deal with so many other people/world status who are in binary dead/alive status outside of V
Status or Corp War
Rogue - dead/alive or even owner of bar
Where romance interests are or even still romance interests
Arasaka strong or weak

its why I'm saddened and not hopeful.
Click to expand...
Easy you allow the player to select the choices that really matters for like at the start of TW3.

So which epilogue did you get? Would impact Saul and Rogue.

Is Smasher alive?

Is Goro Alive?

Netwatch or Vboys?

Etc etc
 
B

bcraig6010

Senior user
#9,147
Dec 31, 2020
TintelFruit said:
V isn’t dead yet, how is it you don’t understand this?
Post automatically merged: Dec 31, 2020


Oof I think they did.
Click to expand...
To be far I think Johnny silverhand in V's body or soulkilled in arasaka does count as dead. Your engram exists in cyberspace/mikoshi but V as we know them - for those endings - is dead, as mikoshi/dying changed johnny - he said as much. and I'm sure merging with ALT/surviving beyond the blackwall would also have - effects.

We even get a funeral scene with Johnny.

I think Johhny silverhand dying when he was soulkilled is a fair statement to make.
I think saying Alt Cunningham is dead is a fair statement to make,.

Engram and AI/Aspect of them continued on respectfully. But AI Alt is not Alt Cunningham
Johnny in V's body is vastly a different Johnny than he was when he was alive the first time.
 
tRYSIS3

tRYSIS3

Senior user
#9,148
Dec 31, 2020
Rawls said:
The did bring back Jon Snow two episodes later. It was great.
Click to expand...
Thank you for reminding me, this is further validation of my point. Not only did the writing become arguably worse at that point, but they also made it happen towards the ending of the show because otherwise, it wouldn't be effective.

This is also the case in other character revivals in movies like Justice League or Avengers which all happened towards the end. Not that those are great examples of good storytelling, but that is because reviving or curing a character is a weak tool to begin with.

I'd ask if you have examples of the opposite, in a well-regarded show or movie, but I'm aware that it doesn't exist
 
Subenu

Subenu

Forum regular
#9,149
Dec 31, 2020
Barsenthor said:
I know why Panam ending is popular because for majority of people it the least bad one and heterosexual male V and lesbian V can be with their SO (ofc no rest for the wicked for the heterosexual female V and gay V).
Click to expand...
Well, I left with Panam and Judy in my Tow as Female/trans V (basically Female, but with an extra) ;)
Still got the ending scene with Panam
 
Rawls

Rawls

Moderator
#9,150
Dec 31, 2020
tRYSIS3 said:
Thank you for reminding me, this is further validation of my point. Not only did the writing become arguably worse at that point, but they also made it happen towards the ending of the show because otherwise, it wouldn't be effective.

This is also the case in other character revivals in movies like Justice League or Avengers which all happened towards the end. Not that those are great examples of good storytelling, but that is because reviving or curing a character is a weak tool to begin with.

I'd ask if you have examples of the opposite, in a well-regarded show or movie, but I'm aware that it doesn't exist
Click to expand...
What? Season 6 is probably the best season of GOTs.
 
  • RED Point
Reactions: TintelFruit
Simuxas

Simuxas

Senior user
#9,151
Dec 31, 2020
Rawls said:
What? Season 6 is probably the best season of GOTs.
Click to expand...
Nah up to season 4 writing was great, then it started falling of slightly with each season, still liked it though, but i felt it dropped in quality.
Post automatically merged: Dec 31, 2020

bcraig6010 said:
To be far I think Johnny silverhand in V's body or soulkilled in arasaka does count as dead. Your engram exists in cyberspace/mikoshi but V as we know them - for those endings - is dead, as mikoshi/dying changed johnny - he said as much. and I'm sure merging with ALT/surviving beyond the blackwall would also have - effects.

We even get a funeral scene with Johnny.

I think Johhny silverhand dying when he was soulkilled is a fair statement to make.
I think saying Alt Cunningham is dead is a fair statement to make,.

Engram and AI/Aspect of them continued on respectfully. But AI Alt is not Alt Cunningham
Johnny in V's body is vastly a different Johnny than he was when he was alive the first time.
Click to expand...
If V goes in cyberspace with Alt, V is dead.
 
tRYSIS3

tRYSIS3

Senior user
#9,152
Dec 31, 2020
Rawls said:
What? Season 6 is probably the best season of GOTs.
Click to expand...
The first season not based on the books, and it's definitely not the best season in the show. This is beside the point which is that the reviving happens towards the end of the series and not in the second season
Post automatically merged: Dec 31, 2020

TintelFruit said:
V isn’t dead yet, how is it you don’t understand this?
Click to expand...
This is pointless. If you know for a fact that there is no continuation are you going to say the same thing?
 
  • RED Point
Reactions: I_Willenbrock_I and Barsenthor
Kikinho

Kikinho

Senior user
#9,153
Dec 31, 2020
Guys this discussion is realy not going anywhere at this point.
There is really no point discussing personal opinions until CDPR tells us what their plans are for the story.
 
  • RED Point
Reactions: I_Willenbrock_I and BilalHuseyn
TintelFruit

TintelFruit

Forum regular
#9,154
Dec 31, 2020
tRYSIS3 said:
The first season not based on the books, and it's definitely not the best season in the show. This is beside the point which is that the reviving happens towards the end of the series and not in the second season
Post automatically merged: Dec 31, 2020


This is pointless. If you know for a fact that there is no continuation are you going to say the same thing?
Click to expand...
Uhhhhh yes?
 
J

jahkin

Forum regular
#9,155
Dec 31, 2020
Rawls said:
The did bring back Jon Snow two episodes later. It was great.
Click to expand...
It was, and especially it was needed, because Jon was one of the actual main characters not even GRR Martin would kill off for good. It was also needed to get him rid of his oath to the night watch...

So within the narrative it made sense. So far, to me and others, the six months seem only there for the drama and "deepness" of the ending.

It would be more like having Jon Snow ending the story with his Ygritte leaving for the North ... and subtitles adding "Jon died 6 months later due to acute Azhor Ahai syndrome! Grimdark!"
 
  • RED Point
Reactions: LordSareth
Rawls

Rawls

Moderator
#9,156
Dec 31, 2020
Alright, let's move Game of Thrones discussion here we're getting off topic.
 
  • RED Point
Reactions: Draconifors
tRYSIS3

tRYSIS3

Senior user
#9,157
Dec 31, 2020
Kikinho said:
Guys this discussion is realy not going anywhere at this point.
There is really no point discussing personal opinions until CDPR tells us what their plans are for the story.
Click to expand...
The topic went from discussing the ending, to speculating about future expansions and DLC. This thread shouldn't be the place for that
 
Simuxas

Simuxas

Senior user
#9,158
Dec 31, 2020
Will have to wait and see what they care about. The game or the money.
 
lolic99

lolic99

Forum regular
#9,159
Dec 31, 2020
bcraig6010 said:
Because after spending 80-100 hours trying to survive - to hand waive away accomplishing that, after all V went through only to fail and be dead/dying would be both a shock and a slap in the face
Click to expand...
One sec, you don't think that
"after spending 80-100 hours trying to survive - to hand waive away accomplishing that, after all V went through only to fail and be dead/dying"
this is not "slap in the face". This is the right ending for you.
But a poster for you will "shock and a slap"? Yes, people can be weird.
 
  • RED Point
Reactions: Subenu
tRYSIS3

tRYSIS3

Senior user
#9,160
Dec 31, 2020
Simuxas said:
Will have to wait and see what they care about. The game or the money.
Click to expand...
Without talking they wouldn't even consider addressing the problem. This is the company that tried to hide console footage knowing that the game is unplayable. We already know what they care about and it's definitely not the game
 
  • RED Point
Reactions: I_Willenbrock_I, Simuxas, JuanEvil and 1 other person
Prev
  • 1
  • …

    Go to page

  • 456
  • 457
  • 458
  • 459
  • 460
  • …

    Go to page

  • 752
Next
First Prev 458 of 752

Go to page

Next Last
Share:
Facebook Twitter Reddit Pinterest Tumblr WhatsApp Email Link
  • English
    English Polski (Polish) Deutsch (German) Русский (Russian) Français (French) Português brasileiro (Brazilian Portuguese) Italiano (Italian) 日本語 (Japanese) Español (Spanish)

STAY CONNECTED

Facebook Twitter YouTube
CDProjekt RED
  • Contact administration
  • User agreement
  • Privacy policy
  • Cookie policy
  • Press Center
© 2018 CD PROJEKT S.A. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED

CD PROJEKT®, Cyberpunk®, Cyberpunk 2077® are registered trademarks of CD PROJEKT S.A. © 2018 CD PROJEKT S.A. All rights reserved. All other copyrights and trademarks are the property of their respective owners.

Forum software by XenForo® © 2010-2020 XenForo Ltd.