The is no more money for them to gain, if they don´t do something on the game. I mean sure they will make some money, but not as much as they could make
You mean besides the very ending you played through?Of course there is the change that we DONT die and become immortal but how well have we seen the arasakas in the game uphold their promises??yeah I dont think we really saw much of that action.
His attempt on your life was soooo obvious. Meanwhile, why couldn't we, i don't know, save Jackie, with so many healing stuff in our pockets? Not only that, Excelsior package could easily carry automated field surgery room. Etc, etc.
On the contrary, people believe that these open endings are the only endings in the game that offer hope.
True, they will soon start asking questions - why should they conjecture open finals and where the fuck is this cut content?
Jepp. Besides you´re warned upfront that Dex is noone to trust. Evelyn tells you how he works with crews that fail him. I´m still kinda sad that I couldn´t just agree to her to leave Dex out of the deal. Because if you could, you may would have been able to save Evelyn.
Not perfectly, but hopeful. Panam/Judy - It's just the best there is.
I have played my V the Cyberpunk way. Fast and furious.
Yep, absolutly. And the outcomes are exactly the same.
The pax mod is probably the stupidest thing I ever met in a game. I did not even consider using it a single second. It''s just it fits so badly the Cyberpunk world, in which Police and Trauma Team shoot first and question later.
Great for you.
I realize that you can play V the way you like.
Going to the zero body count is fine (why not ?) but is it neither rewarding nor fitting to the background. Just listen again to the Good morning Night City sentence at the beginning of the game about the body-count. There is a lottery about it. Life value is zero. NC is a violent place. Empathy is gone to hell and nobody cares for anyone. Only shared self-interests matter.
You can play your V in the white knight way, but I believe it is anachronistic.
This is not true. At least in the nomad ending, she's dead.
As someone here say, story could be better without the relic. Starting slow, doing gigs, gaining money, gear, skills, respect and knowledge, but most importantly, friendship with Jackie, so player really cared about him. And then comes the Heist, but it's Jackie how died and been ressurected by Relic. New approach to classic Jekyll&Hyde story, but from the point of caring friend (V). Then, depending on V's actions, Jackie could be saved, could die, could become V's enemy and final boss... Possibilities are infinite.
Guys, please, stop telling here and there that there is no happy endings in the Cyberpunk genre, or that Cyberpunk stories always end badly.
Neuromancer, Hardwired, Blade Runner... don't end badly and have a satisfactory closure, and they ARE cornerstones of the genre. So please, stop repeating that Cyberpunk deserves a bad ending because it is a cyberpunk world and setting. That just shows you are not familiar with the genre.
Neuromancer, Hardwired, Blade Runner... don't end badly and have a satisfactory closure, and they ARE cornerstones of the genre. So please, stop repeating that Cyberpunk deserves a bad ending because it is a cyberpunk world and setting. That just shows you are not familiar with the genre.
Last edited:
Yep.
The ending is open. Eveything is left to you. Even if I must admit that the European cut and Director's cut are darker than the US cut.
The only real difference between US cut and nomad ending is that Rick is not terminally ill.
No need to look further than Johnny's ending if he takes V's body
Relic renders everything outside the MQ lore and logic breaking.
Any sane person being put in the life/death situation would put on hold everything not related to the saving his/her life. Especially stuff like helping newly met friend to settle her beef with her clan, comfort newly met friend due to grieving after her partner tragic death, solve a murder case related to the political swamp (sorry didn’t do Kerry quest since in my first run I didn’t make it there).
This also makes any optional ending obsolete story wise.
Any sane person being put in the life/death situation would put on hold everything not related to the saving his/her life. Especially stuff like helping newly met friend to settle her beef with her clan, comfort newly met friend due to grieving after her partner tragic death, solve a murder case related to the political swamp (sorry didn’t do Kerry quest since in my first run I didn’t make it there).
This also makes any optional ending obsolete story wise.
Perhaps some possibilities were planned, but in the end the game was glued from what they managed to do.
Well, Johnny was V's friend in my game, and he and his ex Alt went into the "big network".
The parting was sad, but in general, this part of the ending is natural.
Almost the entire map full of grind activities. Apparently CDPR have their own opinion on this matter. And since it is not from Kojima, you can not consider this solution brilliant.
Last edited: