You not only sound rude but also ignorant. CDPR associated with Pondsmith for this game. They could use the name and background Pondsmith brings to life since 1990's. The last edition of Cyberpunk is not called RED for nothing. Both CDPR and Talsorian (Pondsmith's company) benefit from that video game.Edition? Paper games?
I hate to sound rude, but most cyberpunk players absolutely don't give a shit about what the tabletop rules say.
This is a 3D action RPG (or maybe not an RPG anymore) based on something there, in general, it doesn't matter what.
Of course.I mean you can head canon whatever you want. We all do here anyway but it doesn't change that in the end it puts you in the exact same spot as the Nomad/Glory ending with 6 months to live.
Except you didn't get soul killed and none of "your" buddies died.
There is no point in destroying something.Everything points now that this was truly how the game was meant to end, with 6 mo maybe more time and “that’s all folks”.
If people are counting on this there are two roads:
They either go Bethesda and release the Broken steel dlc that will write the next chapter but remember that this was 3rd dlc for FO3
At least, CDPR is better than Bioware : only one game to crash the whole storyTo comment on the mass effect 3 ending.
Bioware never recovered from sticking to their principles.
Mass effect 3s endings (directors cut) made everything perfectly clear. Sheppard might survive if your accumulated points were high enough.
People however were pissed off by the fact that Shepard ruined the galaxy nonetheless and that it was a literal choice at the end.
People were not really pissed off by Shepard going belly up, because it was the end of a trilogy. They were pissed of by star child and it's idiotic reasoning before you could choose your favorite shit sandwich.
In the end, Shepard was successful. V however, wasn't.
As long as CDPR want to...There is no point in destroying something.
The final in FO3 was originally closed and rewritten. In Cyberpunk, ending is open. If V finds the cure behind the next corner in the trash can, it will be strange, but it will not break the original game in any way. You just need to correctly arrange and justify it.
Happy New Year!
You did not understand. For most players, it doesn't matter who this person is Pondsmith, at all.You not only sound rude but also ignorant. CDPR associated with Pondsmith for this game. They could use the name and background Pondsmith brings to life since 1990's. The laste edition of Cyberpunk is not called RED for nothing. Both CDPR and Talsorian (Pondsmith's company) benefit from that video game.
I perfectly understood what you 're pointing at. You do not understand what I'm saying : CDPR sold that game using Pondsmith's game and reputation. They lied. And that's also why that story is disappointing to me : they respect neither the background nor the genre.You did not understand. For most players, it doesn't matter who this person is Pondsmith, at all.
For most, it's just a 3D action game. And the players know only those rules and conventions that are in the game itself. What are the third-party conventions to them "to the lantern".
That is quite obvious.Regarding the state of the whole game, they also didn't respect gamers.
What AAA-game does not get a positive review?That is quite obvious.
But considering the huge amount of positive reviews, I would say they rightly do so...
Witcher was a game based on an already existing IP that CDPR brought to life in a new medium and with a licence. It probably brough a LOT of people into the witcher mythos and increased book sales by I don't even know how much. If the relationship with the original author had been better, CDPR would have probably marketed the original IP a lot more. The netflix adaptation would have never happened without CDPR.Best wishes for 2021, all.
Post automatically merged:
I perfectly understood what you 're pointing at. You do not understand what I'm saying : CDPR sold that game using Pondsmith's game and reputation. They lied. And that's also why that story is disappointing to me : they respect neither the background nor the genre.
Except we don't know that for sure (other deaths). You CANNOT concretely prove or deny it.I don't need to see every death to believe it, the suicide happened offscreen and so did the other deaths
Cyberpunk RED is available since November.Witcher was a game based on an already existing IP that CDPR brought to life in a new medium and with a licence. It probably brough a LOT of people into the witcher mythos and increased book sales by I don't even know how much. If the relationship with the original author had been better, CDPR would have probably marketed the original IP a lot more. The netflix adaptation would have never happened without CDPR.
Pondsmith did not make the same mistake: he most likely saw this as an opportunity to market his own product and Talsorian Games (owner of cyberpunk IP) has been really careful not to add the 2020 corebook into any online platforms before, even though the hype has been incredible. Once the dust settles and CDPR hopefully fix the game enough, it should also affect positively to the cyberpunk2020 and cyperbunk RED sales.
Pondsmith will say nothing against the video game because it is not in his interest (and there may be also legal worries). His goal is to sell the 4th edition of the game. CDPR makes his marketing campaign indirectly for his P&P game. And the game IS a very good visual adaptation. So, it's all the best for him.If Pondsmith does not himself say anything against the endings, I have no idea how CP77 "does not respect the background nor the genre"?